ModGlock17
07-13-2011, 08:09
Mr. Ayoob,
As we draw from experience in old cases, sometimes we can forget the potential usefulness of modern video surveillance systems. Modern means cheaper, more affordable, and simple. And certainly cheaper than long-winded lawsuit cases.
As I looked into the cases that you involved in, there's always a reconstruction of perceived reality from he-said/she-said and expert witnesses. I can't help but think about the potential usefulness of video cameras.
How have the surveillance cameras been useful in self-defense settings?
Today, you can get a video camera for just $30 at office supply stores. Wouldn't that be so useful in cars, etc. to record both video and voice of what actually transpired?
Thx.
As we draw from experience in old cases, sometimes we can forget the potential usefulness of modern video surveillance systems. Modern means cheaper, more affordable, and simple. And certainly cheaper than long-winded lawsuit cases.
As I looked into the cases that you involved in, there's always a reconstruction of perceived reality from he-said/she-said and expert witnesses. I can't help but think about the potential usefulness of video cameras.
How have the surveillance cameras been useful in self-defense settings?
Today, you can get a video camera for just $30 at office supply stores. Wouldn't that be so useful in cars, etc. to record both video and voice of what actually transpired?
Thx.