"He's getting creepy, now." [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : "He's getting creepy, now."


Skyhook
04-01-2012, 06:38
http://online.wsj.com/article/declarations.html

Narcissism:

WE are watching a narcissist rather rapidly being forced to face his delusional position and the consequences of his action.

A narcissist will NOT come to grips, will not recognize his delusions and their consequences and will strive to maintain his position lying himself as he does so, until confroted by a reality his self image cannot accept.


At that point the narcissist will take an action that excuses him from the consequences and transfers the blame to an out side person, group of persons (conservatives) or to a circumstance - the economy, the immediate very dangerous racial tensions, geo/religious politics, Muslim v. the rest of the world, especially Israel and wanton sexual America, etc.) that he cannot control, is not his fault and that, because of the action of others, is beyond even a superman like himself to re-mediate.

Then he will blame others and remove himself from the situation ( resign) or do something hideous like declare martial law, or he will do something bizarre and unexpected but that will leave him as the savior, the superhero in full glory.

Obama, I think, is going to go psychotic, if he is not already .

(I am not a psychiatrist nor do I play one on GT.. this is just what I think I see happening.)

Flintlocker
04-01-2012, 06:45
Those are some pretty big words from a member of a party on the verge of nominating the biggest phony and flip-flopper in RNC history. But you gotta roll how you gotta roll...

Skyhook
04-01-2012, 07:05
Those are some pretty big words from a member of a party on the verge of nominating the biggest phony and flip-flopper in RNC history. But you gotta roll how you gotta roll...

Romney has his faults- unlike Obama, who is faultless:upeyes:- but he is sane and not likely to be a member of an organization intent upon destroying the United States of America.

coastal4974
04-01-2012, 07:13
Those are some pretty big words from a member of a party on the verge of nominating the biggest phony and flip-flopper in RNC history. But you gotta roll how you gotta roll...


Maybe not the biggest but big none the less.

It must really get to the Democrats that even half-a-loaf Romney is better than the Communist agitator that they saddled on the back of this country.

FLIPPER 348
04-01-2012, 09:26
dude, you forgot to call him a little nazi

LASTRESORT20
04-01-2012, 09:35
Romney has his faults- unlike Obama, who is faultless:upeyes:- but he is sane and not likely to be a member of an organization intent upon destroying the United States of America.


This ^^^

Ruble Noon
04-01-2012, 09:43
http://online.wsj.com/article/declarations.html

Narcissism:



Sociopath

http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html

DonGlock26
04-01-2012, 10:18
Obama is a creepy little progressive. Hopefully, he accepts his firing well, but I doubt it.

_

Agonizer
04-01-2012, 10:36
Obama, I think, is going to go psychotic, if he is not already .



I am afraid this is a very real possibility.


.

JFrame
04-01-2012, 10:56
WTF -- "getting" creepy...??? :dunno:


.

Skyhook
04-01-2012, 11:34
dude, you forgot to call him a little nazi


You think that's necessary?

aircarver
04-01-2012, 11:38
You think that's necessary?

....Goes without saying ....

.

G17Jake
04-01-2012, 11:45
Romney has his faults- unlike Obama, who is faultless:upeyes:- but he is sane and not likely to be a member of an organization intent upon destroying the United States of America.

I agree.

And we have two examples of who Obama will place on the Supreme Court...

Skyhook
04-01-2012, 11:47
I agree.

And we have two examples of Obama's Supreme Court Justices...


Yes.

And I never thought we'd have to consider a 'removal tool' for the Supremes, but we never had a nasty child appoint one before.
:faint:

cowboywannabe
04-01-2012, 11:51
i heard obamas next appointment to the u s supreme court is travonte morgan's mom.

snerd
04-01-2012, 11:57
i heard obamas next appointment to the u s supreme court is travonte morgan's mom.
And our next navy ship is being named the USS Trayvon. It's only fitting.

JFrame
04-01-2012, 11:58
In all seriousness, it has been often cited that Cass Sunstein (Obama's "regulatory czar") was on the short list of people he would like to appoint to the SCOTUS -- this is the transnationalist who has foisted a record amount of draconian regulations on U.S. industry, and who has stated that all animals should receive the same civil rights as human beings.


.

Skyhook
04-01-2012, 12:00
In all seriousness, it has been often cited that Cass Sunstein (Obama's "regulatory czar") was on the short list of people he would like to appoint to the SCOTUS -- this is the transnationalist who has foisted a record amount of draconian regulations on U.S. industry, and who has stated that all animals should receive the same civil rights as human beings.


.


O......M......G!

(Obama must go!)

certifiedfunds
04-01-2012, 12:16
Based on his absurd upbringing and family history he should not be psychologically or emotionally normal. He SHOULD be jacked up as a train wreck.

certifiedfunds
04-01-2012, 12:18
And our next navy ship is being named the USS Trayvon. It's only fitting.

It will simply be a transport ship. Incapable of violence. Painted white and where ever it goes doves will circle it.

Gunnut 45/454
04-01-2012, 16:44
Naw your just seeing what cocaine does to your mind in living color! Use enough in your life and it will destroy your mind- creating a lunitic.:upeyes:

ChuteTheMall
04-01-2012, 21:33
Obama is a creepy little progressive. Hopefully, he accepts his firing well, but I doubt it.

_

Hopefully not; I want to see a full-fledged psychotic reaction, a total hissy fit, a totally broken life, maybe even renouce his citizenship and flee to Kenya/Indonesia/Cuba/Obamaville.

Painted white and where ever it goes doves will circle it.

Pigeons will never circle Obama's statue, but they will line up for bombing runs.

series1811
04-02-2012, 07:49
Those are some pretty big words from a member of a party on the verge of nominating the biggest phony and flip-flopper in RNC history. But you gotta roll how you gotta roll...

Come on. Isn't the Truth Squad at least supposed to say that he's not a narcissist? :)

kirgi08
04-02-2012, 08:12
:animlol:

JFrame
04-02-2012, 08:27
Come on. Isn't the Truth Squad at least supposed to say that he's not a narcissist? :)


Their defense of Obama seems to have been relegated to, "Oh, yeah??? Well, your guy sucks too!"




:whistling:


.

Gundude
04-02-2012, 09:12
Their defense of Obama seems to have been relegated to, "Oh, yeah??? Well, your guy sucks too!"




:whistling:


.Ironic, isn't it, that that's all either side has.

Brucev
04-02-2012, 09:24
Romney has his faults- unlike Obama, who is faultless:upeyes:- but he is sane and not likely to be a member of an organization intent upon destroying the United States of America.

Very well stated.

eracer
04-02-2012, 09:49
Their defense of Obama seems to have been relegated to, "Oh, yeah??? Well, your guy sucks too!"Who is 'They?"

Do you mean the sheeple who believe that supporting a libertarian is anathema to liberty without excessive governmental interference, and instead are content to suck from the teat of so-called 'Republican Party,' ending up with a candidate whose pack of lies makes him nearly as bad as the socialist we all seek to replace?

JFrame
04-02-2012, 09:50
Ironic, isn't it, that that's all either side has.

We have first-hand experience of what Obama is doing in the Oval Office, and have no reason to expect it will get any better in a second term, when he is freed from the constraints of having to maintain a semblance of moderation for the sake of reelection. Indeed, logic dictates that he can only get worse.

So, no -- I don't buy that shot at equivalence.


.

JFrame
04-02-2012, 09:52
Who is 'They?"


"They" can be identified on this very thread, as well as scattered throughout the forum.


.

English
04-02-2012, 09:55
Come on. Isn't the Truth Squad at least supposed to say that he's not a narcissist? :)

Erm... Wouldn't it be harder to argue that than argue that he is a natural born American?

English

eracer
04-02-2012, 09:55
"They" can be identified on this very thread, as well as scattered throughout the forum.


.If you're wearing Glenn Beck-colored glasses (with optional 'sniff-sniff' tear generator.)

JFrame
04-02-2012, 09:57
If you're wearing Glenn Beck-colored glasses (with optional 'sniff-sniff' tear generator.)


I have never seen Beck wearing tinted lenses! :cool:


.

Gundude
04-02-2012, 10:02
We have first-hand experience of what Obama is doing in the Oval Office, and have no reason to expect it will get any better in a second term, when he is freed from the constraints of having to maintain a semblance of moderation for the sake of reelection. Indeed, logic dictates that he can only get worse.

So, no -- I don't buy that shot at equivalence.


.The equivalence is that nobody says anything good about Romney, only that Obama's worse. That's all you claimed Obama supporters had in defense of Obama. So it's the same.

series1811
04-02-2012, 10:05
So, for the record, nobody here is saying that they think Obama is not a narcissist, (and suffering from NPD), they just think other people are worse? :)

JFrame
04-02-2012, 10:34
The equivalence is that nobody says anything good about Romney, only that Obama's worse. That's all you claimed Obama supporters had in defense of Obama. So it's the same.

I don't believe Romney would nominate a Kagan or Sotomayor to the SCOTUS...There -- I just said a good thing about Romney that I can't say about Obama. :)

.

Gundude
04-02-2012, 10:49
I don't believe Romney would nominate a Kagan or Sotomayor to the SCOTUS...There -- I just said a good thing about Romney that I can't say about Obama. :)

.That's not something good about Romney, it's just a hypothetical on your part that may or not be accurate. I don't doubt for a second that he would nominate somebody who helped him out with his health care mandate.

Fred Hansen
04-02-2012, 10:58
It will simply be a transport ship. Incapable of violence. Painted white and where ever it goes doves will circle it.http://www.foreverflying.com/nt-shiprb1m.jpg

G29Reload
04-02-2012, 11:08
Based on his absurd upbringing and family history he should not be psychologically or emotionally normal. He SHOULD be jacked up as a train wreck.

Both parents abandoned him at least once if not a couple of times. He was a nuisance and burden to narcissist parents who saw their duty as elsewhere changing the world to a socialist image.

And it won't end well….

His signature piece of legislation will be overturned by SCOTUS,

He will be fired in November.

People will be miserable with high gas prices.
Unemployment will be above 8%
Cardinal promises will be unfulfilled.

R's will control the White House / HR / Senate and thus
The future of the Supreme Court

It was 16 years between Carter's election and Clinton's

It will be that long again before there is another Dem.

Hopefully the damage will be repaired.

JFrame
04-02-2012, 11:16
That's not something good about Romney, it's just a hypothetical on your part that may or not be accurate. I don't doubt for a second that he would nominate somebody who helped him out with his health care mandate.

For or against, we are stuck with stating respective projections on Romney, versus what we know Obama has done.


.

Skyhook
04-02-2012, 11:18
Very well stated.


:cheers:

ChuteTheMall
04-02-2012, 11:18
It was 16 years between Carter's election and Clinton's

It will be that long again before there is another Dem.

Hopefully the damage will be repaired.

The media and the teachers' unions will try again with a new generation of indebted, entitled weaklings.

Never let up.

Skyhook
04-02-2012, 11:21
The media and the teachers' unions will try again with a new generation of indebted, entitled weaklings.

Never let up.


Let's not forget the UAW and those various 'Public Employees Unions' as well as some others who see endless spigots dripping with milk and honey with plug-in Unicorns awaiting their riders.

RCP
04-02-2012, 11:29
For or against, we are stuck with stating respective projections on Romney, versus what we know Obama has done.


.

Than it should be noted that Romney HAS signed a permanent assault weapons ban.

JFrame
04-02-2012, 11:58
Than it should be noted that Romney HAS signed a permanent assault weapons ban.

I won't discuss the nuances of that particular signing here -- it has been hashed over ad nauseum on other threads.


.

Fred Hansen
04-02-2012, 11:59
Than it should be noted that Romney HAS signed a permanent assault weapons ban.More importantly--at least with regard to SCOTUS--75% of his judicial appointments have been liberals.

Obama/Romney = Lose/Lose

RCP
04-02-2012, 12:06
Yep it's kinda like being asked if you wanna shoot yourself in the head or jump off the roof with a short rope tied around your neck. We can argue over which method might be better in some ways but the eventual outcome is the same.

kirgi08
04-02-2012, 12:25
More importantly--at least with regard to SCOTUS--75% of his judicial appointments have been liberals.

Obama/Romney = Lose/Lose

Fred,the point that's missed is "state" level versus "fed" level.He's gotta worry about 56 other states.He is a plug in a damn in this nation.We need a reset,and a warder until the next gen of conservatives get's their teeth.The most important thing imho is the scotus,obama managed ta seat 2,due ta his control of the houses.

We start with the SCOTUS,and remove as needed.Then the vote ta take out the rest of the garbage.

I'm not a Mitt fan,as far as I see mitt is ambivalent in tete a tete with the current problem.'08.

Fred Hansen
04-02-2012, 15:01
Fred,the point that's missed is "state" level versus "fed" level.He's gotta worry about 56 other states.He is a plug in a damn in this nation.We need a reset,and a warder until the next gen of conservatives get's their teeth.The most important thing imho is the scotus,obama managed ta seat 2,due ta his control of the houses.

We start with the SCOTUS,and remove as needed.Then the vote ta take out the rest of the garbage.

I'm not a Mitt fan,as far as I see mitt is ambivalent in tete a tete with the current problem.'08.Some reasonable points. :wavey:

ChuteTheMall
04-02-2012, 17:17
Pretty hard to "remove as needed" from the SCOTUS.http://i39.tinypic.com/w7zd60.gif

4TS&W
04-02-2012, 17:29
I don't see the turnout and enthusiasm this time around that that guy had last time. Not that Romney looks super conservative promising...

All the people who were cheering last time and who had jobs are really not feeling it this time around.

If the vote goes for him this time, you can thank women voters who get their news from MSM and believe it.

Gunnut 45/454
04-03-2012, 00:13
I like how the RP supporters high jacked the thread to support the savior Obama. You guys never quit do ya!:faint:

RCP
04-03-2012, 05:34
I like how you try and equate pointing out Romneys liberal history as support for Obama. Go ahead vote for the version with the "R" behind his name while trying to justify it as somehow being a little better than the mess we have in there now. I'll have no part of it, they are both the same as far as I see it meaning it doesn't matter which we vote for other than to show what hypocrits so called "Conservatives" are by pushing their own candidate who legislated mandated healthcare and weapons bans into existence. Claiming that those things were ok to do because our guy did it and now he's somehow going to turn the country around is crazy IMO.