JohnW1963
04-21-2012, 10:34
Disbar Zimmerman Prosecutor
Prosecutors are special. They wield the ability to charge, or not charge, criminal defendants in very serious matters. Matters that have a profound impact on society as a whole and on individuals’ lives. With that power though, also comes responsibility and an obligation to be fully forthcoming and honest to the point where prosecutors are required to divulge to the defendant and his or her attorney exculpatory facts; i.e. facts that tend to show innocence rather than guilt. (Facts that support the defendant’s version of events can not be withheld – under punishment for prosecutorial misconduct.) Grossly mischaracterizing evidence could also be grounds for disbarment. Look at Prosecutor Nifong in the DuKe La Crosse players’ case. He withheld evidence and falsely presented evidence and he was disgraced and disbarred. So too should George Zimmerman’s prosecutor in Florida. In her affidavit for the Second Degree Murder charge, she grossly mischaracterized evidence and withheld critical exculpatory evidence from the affidavit. If I was the Judge at the pre-trial probable cause hearing, I would not only dismiss the Second Degree Murder charge, I would also order my Law Clerk to notify the State Bar Association of grossly unethical behavior by the Prosecutor in her selective presentation of facts that omits key exculpatory evidence; and, also misrepresents known facts to such a great extent that is beyond ethical boundaries. What facts did the prosecutor have at her disposal when preparing the affidavit? If she knowingly withheld exculpatory evidence she should be disbarred.
Media Manipulation of Facts:
ABC first shows a blurry version of video promoting the false meme that Zimmerman had no visible head injuries when he was brought into the Police Station. However, that video was capable of being seen much clearer than presented by ABC and lo and behold, in the clearer version, certainly available to ABC prior to its publishing the blurry video, you can easily see head injuries to George Zimmerman. Duh! ABC is a racist liberal joke of a news service and is more aptly referred to as Obama’s Propaganda Agency. Also, NBC knowingly edits Zimmerman’s 911 call to make him look like a racist. They supposedly “fired” the unnamed producer responsible for the fraudulent presentation of the facts, but refused to name the person responsible so she or he can still get another job with the ultra-liberal Mainstream Lamestream Media. Numerous news outlets presented pictures of Treyvon as a 12 year old boy. These pictures were used over and over again and are still being used, even though they are over five (5) years old and portray Treyvon much smaller than he actually was on the night of the offence. He was 17. Not 12. Much larger and stronger and with a history of poor decision-making. But the media can only lie for so long until the truth comes out and now the truth is coming out. ABC actually showed a very clear picture showing Zimmerman's serious head injuries.
What we do know:
We don’t know all the facts, but we can determine that several facts that are extremely relevant to the Zimmerman affidavit were purposefully omitted in violation of the Prosecutor’s obligation to be honest and disclose all facts, even exculpatory facts. No mention in affidavit of injuries to Zimmerman’s head, both back and front. Zimmerman had a bloody broken nose consistent with a direct blow to the nose; and he had several gashes on the back of his head consistent with being slammed against a concrete sidewalk. Eyewitnesses stated that Zimmerman was on the bottom, that Zimmerman was the one screaming for help, and that the guy who started it all was the one dead on the ground when all was over with. In the affidavit, the Prosecutor actually does this: She put in the affidavit that Treyvon’s Mom identified the voice calling for help on the 911 tape as Treyvon’s voice. However, independent voice analysis shows and the Prosecutor either knew or should have known this, that the voice calling for help was Zimmerman, not Treyvon.
If someone is getting the **** kicked out of them, they can use deadly force to defend themselves. All the known physical evidence corroborates George Zimmerman’s version of events. Nothing, no evidence whatsoever, supports Treyvon’s families’ version – which is the version bought hook, line and sinker, by this political hack of a prosecutor who sold her ethics to appease. There is no room in the Law for a Prosecutor who so brazenly omits critical exculpatory facts from a Murder 2 affidavit.
All initial investigators determined a clear case of self defense:
If I was the defense attorney I would call all the police officers who witnessed Zimmerman’s injurys along with Doctor, Medics etc. with pictures and x-rays to corroborate that Zimmerman suffered serious injury to his nose and the back of his head consistent with being punched in the nose and having his head smashed against a concrete sidewalk. Call the independent witnesses who corroborate Zimmerman was being attacked. And ask the initial detectives why they did not charge Zimmerman that night with any crime whatsoever. Lock them in that if they believed that Zimmerman had committed any offense, surely their sworn duty would have been to arrest him that night. So obviously, they did not think he had committed a crime.
Also, the first prosecutor who reviewed the facts with the police and decided not to bring charges should be called to testify and explain why she or he did not charge Zimmerman. Why? Why no charges? Be specific with the pictures and other evidence: Did you consider the fact that Zimmerman's nose was broken according to the Doctor's report? Did you consider that ZSimmerman had serious gashes to the back of his head before deciding not to press any charges. etc. etc. Because this is one of the most clearest cases of self-defense you will ever see! All of the physical evidence supports Zimmerman’s version of events. He was certainly in danger of losing life or limb or ending up a vegetable so he did what GOD’S LAW allows: he defended himself. Fortunately for Zimmerman, Florida’s Law remains consistent with God’s Law concerning self-defense. (But not so in England – the direction we are headed in where defending yourself and your house can land you in prison! No lie – look it up).
Prosecutors bear a heavy burden and most are ethical and honest concerning exculpatory evidence. The Florida Prosecutor in the Zimmerman case is shameful and should be held accountable for her violation of ancient principles enshrined in our Constitution and case law. She knowingly blindfolded lady liberty by hiding numerous critical facts from her Second Degree Murder Affidavit in a brazen political move to appease an interest group.
The Florida Bar Association should make an example of her; however, bar associations are notoriously liberal and they will probably give her an award or something......
Prosecutors are special. They wield the ability to charge, or not charge, criminal defendants in very serious matters. Matters that have a profound impact on society as a whole and on individuals’ lives. With that power though, also comes responsibility and an obligation to be fully forthcoming and honest to the point where prosecutors are required to divulge to the defendant and his or her attorney exculpatory facts; i.e. facts that tend to show innocence rather than guilt. (Facts that support the defendant’s version of events can not be withheld – under punishment for prosecutorial misconduct.) Grossly mischaracterizing evidence could also be grounds for disbarment. Look at Prosecutor Nifong in the DuKe La Crosse players’ case. He withheld evidence and falsely presented evidence and he was disgraced and disbarred. So too should George Zimmerman’s prosecutor in Florida. In her affidavit for the Second Degree Murder charge, she grossly mischaracterized evidence and withheld critical exculpatory evidence from the affidavit. If I was the Judge at the pre-trial probable cause hearing, I would not only dismiss the Second Degree Murder charge, I would also order my Law Clerk to notify the State Bar Association of grossly unethical behavior by the Prosecutor in her selective presentation of facts that omits key exculpatory evidence; and, also misrepresents known facts to such a great extent that is beyond ethical boundaries. What facts did the prosecutor have at her disposal when preparing the affidavit? If she knowingly withheld exculpatory evidence she should be disbarred.
Media Manipulation of Facts:
ABC first shows a blurry version of video promoting the false meme that Zimmerman had no visible head injuries when he was brought into the Police Station. However, that video was capable of being seen much clearer than presented by ABC and lo and behold, in the clearer version, certainly available to ABC prior to its publishing the blurry video, you can easily see head injuries to George Zimmerman. Duh! ABC is a racist liberal joke of a news service and is more aptly referred to as Obama’s Propaganda Agency. Also, NBC knowingly edits Zimmerman’s 911 call to make him look like a racist. They supposedly “fired” the unnamed producer responsible for the fraudulent presentation of the facts, but refused to name the person responsible so she or he can still get another job with the ultra-liberal Mainstream Lamestream Media. Numerous news outlets presented pictures of Treyvon as a 12 year old boy. These pictures were used over and over again and are still being used, even though they are over five (5) years old and portray Treyvon much smaller than he actually was on the night of the offence. He was 17. Not 12. Much larger and stronger and with a history of poor decision-making. But the media can only lie for so long until the truth comes out and now the truth is coming out. ABC actually showed a very clear picture showing Zimmerman's serious head injuries.
What we do know:
We don’t know all the facts, but we can determine that several facts that are extremely relevant to the Zimmerman affidavit were purposefully omitted in violation of the Prosecutor’s obligation to be honest and disclose all facts, even exculpatory facts. No mention in affidavit of injuries to Zimmerman’s head, both back and front. Zimmerman had a bloody broken nose consistent with a direct blow to the nose; and he had several gashes on the back of his head consistent with being slammed against a concrete sidewalk. Eyewitnesses stated that Zimmerman was on the bottom, that Zimmerman was the one screaming for help, and that the guy who started it all was the one dead on the ground when all was over with. In the affidavit, the Prosecutor actually does this: She put in the affidavit that Treyvon’s Mom identified the voice calling for help on the 911 tape as Treyvon’s voice. However, independent voice analysis shows and the Prosecutor either knew or should have known this, that the voice calling for help was Zimmerman, not Treyvon.
If someone is getting the **** kicked out of them, they can use deadly force to defend themselves. All the known physical evidence corroborates George Zimmerman’s version of events. Nothing, no evidence whatsoever, supports Treyvon’s families’ version – which is the version bought hook, line and sinker, by this political hack of a prosecutor who sold her ethics to appease. There is no room in the Law for a Prosecutor who so brazenly omits critical exculpatory facts from a Murder 2 affidavit.
All initial investigators determined a clear case of self defense:
If I was the defense attorney I would call all the police officers who witnessed Zimmerman’s injurys along with Doctor, Medics etc. with pictures and x-rays to corroborate that Zimmerman suffered serious injury to his nose and the back of his head consistent with being punched in the nose and having his head smashed against a concrete sidewalk. Call the independent witnesses who corroborate Zimmerman was being attacked. And ask the initial detectives why they did not charge Zimmerman that night with any crime whatsoever. Lock them in that if they believed that Zimmerman had committed any offense, surely their sworn duty would have been to arrest him that night. So obviously, they did not think he had committed a crime.
Also, the first prosecutor who reviewed the facts with the police and decided not to bring charges should be called to testify and explain why she or he did not charge Zimmerman. Why? Why no charges? Be specific with the pictures and other evidence: Did you consider the fact that Zimmerman's nose was broken according to the Doctor's report? Did you consider that ZSimmerman had serious gashes to the back of his head before deciding not to press any charges. etc. etc. Because this is one of the most clearest cases of self-defense you will ever see! All of the physical evidence supports Zimmerman’s version of events. He was certainly in danger of losing life or limb or ending up a vegetable so he did what GOD’S LAW allows: he defended himself. Fortunately for Zimmerman, Florida’s Law remains consistent with God’s Law concerning self-defense. (But not so in England – the direction we are headed in where defending yourself and your house can land you in prison! No lie – look it up).
Prosecutors bear a heavy burden and most are ethical and honest concerning exculpatory evidence. The Florida Prosecutor in the Zimmerman case is shameful and should be held accountable for her violation of ancient principles enshrined in our Constitution and case law. She knowingly blindfolded lady liberty by hiding numerous critical facts from her Second Degree Murder Affidavit in a brazen political move to appease an interest group.
The Florida Bar Association should make an example of her; however, bar associations are notoriously liberal and they will probably give her an award or something......