Soros: Obama/Romney "little difference" [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : Soros: Obama/Romney "little difference"


RCP
04-25-2012, 06:35
http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/SorosObama-RomneyNotMuchDifference/2012/01/28/id/425830

Billionaire financier George Soros thinks that, if Mitt Romney wins the presidency, there will be "little difference" between him and Barack Obama in the White House.

RCP
04-25-2012, 06:53
Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh described Soros' move this way: "He's endorsing Romney. 'Romney, that's cool, no difference, I could go either way that way.'":whistling:

coastal4974
04-25-2012, 07:02
So I guess we should do what Sorros wants, give up. :upeyes:

JBnTX
04-25-2012, 07:03
This is a tactic that the left/democrat voters use to bring Romney down to Obama's level.

Obviously, they can't raise Obama to Romney's level so they try to increase Obama's chances of winning by making voters believe that it doesn't matter who they vote for.

The democrat troll posters here do the same thing.

JFrame
04-25-2012, 07:04
I take it this thread is being posted for informational purposes only, and that we're not actually supposed to believe or trust anything George Soros says...


.

aircarver
04-25-2012, 08:20
Well, Soros, since it's all the same to you, how about making me happy and put a buncha money into putting Romney in and the squatter out ....

.

JFrame
04-25-2012, 08:58
Well, Soros, since it's all the same to you, how about making me happy and put a buncha money into putting Romney in and the squatter out ....

.


:rofl:

Let's see "Spooky Dude" put his money where his mouth is... :supergrin:


.

Gundude
04-25-2012, 09:04
Well, Soros, since it's all the same to you, how about making me happy and put a buncha money into putting Romney in and the squatter out ....

.I'm sure that making you happy is among the top items on Soros' to-do list...

cowboywannabe
04-25-2012, 09:05
if thats the case, ask soros which candidate he is buying, er um, i mean supporting.

Gundude
04-25-2012, 09:11
if thats the case, ask soros which candidate he is buying, er um, i mean supporting.He will buy whichever one wins. What he means by "little difference" is that the cost of buying either one of them will be the same to him.

Cavalry Doc
04-25-2012, 09:41
Not exactly the source I go to for political plans. :rofl:

aircarver
04-25-2012, 09:47
Not exactly the source I go to for political plans. :rofl:

Y'don't think he has your best interests at heart ? ......:supergrin:

.

cowboywannabe
04-25-2012, 10:01
He will buy whichever one wins. What he means by "little difference" is that the cost of buying either one of them will be the same to him.

oh no, he will buy one of them now in order to lay the ground work for his plans.....he bought obama once before when was running the first time. i wonder if he will do it again.

The Machinist
04-25-2012, 10:03
Of course there's little difference between the two. They both hate guns, they both want socialized medicine, and they're both bought and paid for by Goldman Sachs.

JBnTX
04-25-2012, 10:12
Of course there's little difference between the two. They both hate guns, they both want socialized medicine, and they're both bought and paid for by Goldman Sachs.


Do you realize that you're in agreement with George Soros, who's probably the biggest liberal/marxist on the planet?

Since there's no difference between Romney and Obama (so you say)
does that mean that you'd find no fault with a person that votes for Obama?

Will you vote for Obama?


..

G29Reload
04-25-2012, 10:13
This is a tactic that the left/democrat voters use to bring Romney down to Obama's level.

Obviously, they can't raise Obama to Romney's level so they try to increase Obama's chances of winning by making voters believe that it doesn't matter who they vote for.

The democrat troll posters here do the same thing.

This. Soros is the last person I would expect the truth from. Mittens has issues, but equivalence with Obama is not one of them.

seriously. Mittens is Type II diabetes, Obama is malignant cancer.

Very.Different.Outcomes. The first is treatable. The second is funeral arrangements.

cowboywannabe
04-25-2012, 10:26
This. Soros is the last person I would expect the truth from. Mittens has issues, but equivalence with Obama is not one of them.

seriously. Mittens is Type II diabetes, Obama is malignant cancer.

Very.Different.Outcomes. The first is treatable. The second is funeral arrangements.

very well put.

wjv
04-25-2012, 10:32
Of course there's little difference between the two. They both hate guns, they both want socialized medicine, and they're both bought and paid for by Goldman Sachs.

And I'm sure they will both nominate the same judges to the Federal & Supreme courts. . . :upeyes:

The effect of a good/bad president on the judicial system can last for decades. Even if all else was the same, the choices in judges would be enough to vote for one over another. .

walt cowan
04-25-2012, 10:47
george has just told everyone that their all club members. oh ye suckers!

G29Reload
04-25-2012, 10:54
And I'm sure they will both nominate the same judges to the Federal & Supreme courts. . . :upeyes:

The effect of a good/bad president on the judicial system can last for decades. Even if all else was the same, the choices in judges would be enough to vote for one over another. .

There is also some granularity of detail with regard to Mitt.

He actually IS very conservative on some issues.

Last night, Larry Kudlow did an analysis on Mittens on the John Batchelor show.

Mitt's big problem for many here, especially the RP supporters are the social issues. If I had to name two, its his past with regard to healthcare and gun control.

Now, he has committed to repeal of O-care and the SCOTUS may deal with that. He's committed to Uncle Ted on specifics re: not pursuing gun control.

On ECONOMIC issues, Kudlow claims Mitt is extremely conservative and always has been, financially speaking. I don't recall all the details, but he went over them in depth. Guy knows what he's doing. You can't run a money fund successfully by being a crackpot.

As opposed to Zero, who I seriously believe could flunk a basic arithmetic test. We have this inexperienced clown in office who has brought in friends, hacks, charlatans, partisans and radical thinkers, all from academia and the radical left. He's tried crackpot ideas and concepts he heard in college, he's running on redistributionist philosophy he learned from Bill Ayers. Worse, he has learned nothing from his experience and he's dogmatically intransigent, unyielding, hellbent on pursuing an agenda that appeals to the envious, ie, his base of maybe 28-32% of the country. The 3-in-10 you just want to punch in the face whenever you see them open their mouths.

If I were to step back and examine what is really wrong today, the most overarching, see it when you get up in the morning problem, inescapable, pervasive, plaguing, when will it end kind of issue, it is the economy.

On this, Mitt wins, hands down. I could actually stand up and cheer for him if he uses this against Zero on the campaign trail, then gets elected and implements it. Previously spoken of pent-up demand and newly re-found economic freedom will just explode, and with a broadened base the revenue influx will start to repair and reverse some of the damage to our Treasury.

If Mitt gets in and fixes the economy, simply undoing the massive damage done by Zero, a lot of other problems will simply solve themselves.

Then we can argue about the other stuff. I haven't forgotten and I'm an avid gun owner too.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 10:58
Do you realize that you're in agreement with George Soros, who's probably the biggest liberal/marxist on the planet?

Since there's no difference between Romney and Obama (so you say)
does that mean that you'd find no fault with a person that votes for Obama?

Will you vote for Obama?


..

So I say as well.

There isn't.

Progressive Lib (R) = Progressive Lib (D)

Both Progressive Libs.

G29Reload
04-25-2012, 11:03
So I say as well.

There isn't.

Progressive Lib (R) = Progressive Lib (D)

Both Progressive Libs.

Clearly not paying attention to the discussion.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 11:13
Clearly not paying attention to the discussion.

Keep working with that.


He's a progressive. He claims it. I don't need to follow the country jumping over the cliff. I've seen Wiley E. Coyote do it several times.

http://youtu.be/dMcjJEXt9To

I can also lead you to his stance on abortion, amnesty, gun control, health care and several other progressive stances he has claimed to.

Ruble Noon
04-25-2012, 11:20
And I'm sure they will both nominate the same judges to the Federal & Supreme courts. . . :upeyes:

The effect of a good/bad president on the judicial system can last for decades. Even if all else was the same, the choices in judges would be enough to vote for one over another. .

Yes they can. That is why we should be backing a conservative instead of a big government liberal.

Ruble Noon
04-25-2012, 11:21
Keep working with that.


He's a progressive. He claims it. I don't need to follow the country jumping over the cliff. I've seen Wiley E. Coyote do it several times.

http://youtu.be/dMcjJEXt9To

I can also lead you to his stance on abortion, amnesty, gun control, health care and several other progressive stances he has claimed to.

You can lead them there but you can't make them think.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 11:27
You can lead them there but you can't make them think.

I didn't originally post this and don't remember who did but I like it.

http://youtu.be/3xwLedWzn18

JBnTX
04-25-2012, 12:01
So I say as well.

There isn't.

Both Progressive Libs.


That kind of talk helps Obama and hurts Romney.

By bad mouthing Romney and removing any difference between the two,
you make it easier for a person to vote for Obama.

Soros thanks you and Obama thanks you.


..

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 12:05
That kind of talk helps Obama and hurts Romney.

By bad mouthing Romney and removing any difference between the two,
you make it easier for a person to vote for Obama.

Soros thanks you and Obama thanks you.


..

I don't help progressive libs on the right or the left.

RC-RAMIE
04-25-2012, 12:08
That kind of talk helps Obama and hurts Romney.

By bad mouthing Romney and removing any difference between the two,
you make it easier for a person to vote for Obama.

Soros thanks you and Obama thanks you.


..

For pointing out his record and previous statements. Be mad at Romney for being a progressive be mad at the Republican party for being ok with that.

JFrame
04-25-2012, 12:17
I think the point is, why is anyone bothering to listen to George Soros about anything? What credibility does he, in particular, have about being an arbiter of truth?

It's like Obama has said at least 30 times in the past two weeks that he believes in free market capitalism. Yeah -- so?


.

RCP
04-25-2012, 12:46
I think the point is, why is anyone bothering to listen to Mitt Romney about anything? What credibility does he, in particular, have about being an arbiter of truth?

It's like Obama has said at least 30 times in the past two weeks that he believes in free market capitalism. Yeah -- so?


.

Fixed it for you. Romney cannot be trusted either as he's for sale to the highest bidder and Soros knows it. It's a shame the ABO crowd refuses to see or admit it. Romney ='s no change from Obama.

JBnTX
04-25-2012, 13:14
Fixed it for you. Romney cannot be trusted either as he's for sale to the highest bidder and Soros knows it. It's a shame the ABO crowd refuses to see or admit it. Romney ='s no change from Obama.

WE GET IT! There's no difference!

But voters MUST make a choice this fall.

Who would you recommend they vote for?
Neither one is NOT an option.

Responsible people vote, and to do so means they must make
a choice.

Make a friggin choice and quit hiding behind all that negativism.

Which one do you recommend a person vote for?

JFrame
04-25-2012, 13:15
Fixed it for you. Romney cannot be trusted either as he's for sale to the highest bidder and Soros knows it. It's a shame the ABO crowd refuses to see or admit it. Romney ='s no change from Obama.

Amending other people's posts is a no-no pursuant to the TOS... :innocent:

I think you missed the irony of your own OP in using some comments by the duke of duplicity to try and prove a point.


.

Smacktard
04-25-2012, 13:26
tagged

G29Reload
04-25-2012, 14:09
Keep working with that.


Really? 2002?

Keep working with THAT.

As in 10 YEARS ago.

Don't bother to read anything else here about what is different between the two. Or what has changed.

G29Reload
04-25-2012, 14:10
I don't help progressive libs on the right or the left.

You do help those on the left, apparently.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 14:16
Really? 2002?

Keep working with THAT.

As in 10 YEARS ago.

Don't bother to read anything else here about what is different between the two. Or what has changed.

Oh right.. he's not progressive anymore.. got it :rofl:

You do help those on the left, apparently.

More accurately, the Republicans have helped the left with their sorry excuse for potential candidate.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 14:23
Romney Vows to Maintain 'Progressive' Tax Code

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/romney-vows-maintain-progressive-tax-code

Romney supports automatic hikes in minimum wage.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/01/romney-supports-automatic-hikes-in-minimum-wage/

A solid conservative for sure.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 14:48
Romney increased taxes by $309 million, mainly on corporations. These tax hikes, described by Romney apologists as loophole closures, totaled $128 million in 2003, $95.5 in 2004, and $85 million in 2005. That final year, Romney proposed $170 million in higher business taxes, the Boston Globe reports.

http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120106/OPINION02/701069993

At least one frontrunner candidate stands in contrast with a decidedly mixed record on the gun issue. While Mitt Romney likes to “talk the pro-gun talk,” he has not always walked the walk.

http://www.usacarry.com/mitt-romney-and-gun-control/


Go team..go.

JBnTX
04-25-2012, 15:16
Romney increased taxes by $309 million, mainly on corporations. These tax hikes, described by Romney apologists as loophole closures, totaled $128 million in 2003, $95.5 in 2004, and $85 million in 2005. That final year, Romney proposed $170 million in higher business taxes,
.


What has Obama done?

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 15:18
What has Obama done?

Very little that Romney disagrees with.

Can you call up the Republican party and request a conservative Republican candidate for us to vote on?

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 15:19
Please?

Bren
04-25-2012, 15:19
Soros may be right - with the following exceptions I have pointed out repeatedly -

Even a Romney who is exactly the same as Obama:
1. Has to please the Republican party
2. Has to worry about reelection.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 15:23
Soros may be right - with the following exceptions I have pointed out repeatedly -

Even a Romney who is exactly the same as Obama:
1. Has to please the Republican party
2. Has to worry about reelection.

The Republican party is apparently way too easy to please.

Ruble Noon
04-25-2012, 15:24
Soros may be right - with the following exceptions I have pointed out repeatedly -

Even a Romney who is exactly the same as Obama:
1. Has to please the Republican party
2. Has to worry about reelection.

Would that be the same republican party that punted on raising the debt ceiling, the same republican party that voted nearly unanimously to limit the 1st Amendment, the same republican party that voted for and rejoiced at allowing the military to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens?

RC-RAMIE
04-25-2012, 15:29
Soros may be right - with the following exceptions I have pointed out repeatedly -

Even a Romney who is exactly the same as Obama:
1. Has to please the Republican party
2. Has to worry about reelection.

So what do we do come reelection time for Mitt, vote for a democrat?

Flying-Dutchman
04-25-2012, 15:35
Rule of Thumb - Whatever your enemy says, believe the opposite.

Romney is a conservative pretending to be a liberal.

Obama is a socialist dictator pretending to be a liberal.

JBnTX
04-25-2012, 15:35
Very little that Romney disagrees with.

Can you call up the Republican party and request a conservative Republican candidate for us to vote on?


I'm voting for Romney, so I guess our votes will cancel each other out.

:rofl:

Ruble Noon
04-25-2012, 15:37
Rule of Thumb - Whatever your enemy says, believe the opposite.

Romney is a conservative pretending to be a liberal.

Obama is a socialist dictator pretending to be a liberal.

I think you got that part switched around.

Romney is a liberal pretending to be a conservative.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 15:37
I'm voting for Romney, so I guess our votes will cancel each other out.

:rofl:

I'm good with that :wavey:

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 15:38
Rule of Thumb - Whatever your enemy says, believe the opposite.

Romney is a conservative pretending to be a liberal.

Why?


Obama is a socialist dictator pretending to be a liberal.

Same thing.

lancesorbenson
04-25-2012, 15:41
Guy knows what he's doing. You can't run a money fund successfully by being a crackpot.


This is a ridiculous statement. Corzine, Madoff, hell even Soros himself, have all run successful funds. Fund managers tend to be button-down types, but there are plenty of crackpots to go around. I knew a few when I worked in that industry and some were complete whackos.

Flying-Dutchman
04-25-2012, 16:09
Why?
.
Romney’s life leads me to believe he is a conservative; all politicians in Massachusetts must pretend to be liberal.

Romney promised repeatedly to end Obama Care on day one. Obama vows to keep it at all costs.

Romney will keep this promise if he wants to win a 2nd term.

Romney the businessman and the Tea Party Congress will straighten out the budget.

Obama has been running the Country without a budget for 1,000 days; a dereliction of duty.

syntaxerrorsix
04-25-2012, 16:14
Romney’s life leads me to believe he is a conservative; all politicians in Massachusetts must pretend to be liberal.

Romney promised repeatedly to end Obama Care on day one. Obama vows to keep it at all costs.

Romney will keep this promise if he wants to win a 2nd term.

Romney the businessman and the Tea Party Congress will straighten out the budget.

Obama has been running the Country without a budget for 1,000 days; a dereliction of duty.

I suppose we shall see. His track record of accomplishments isn't very convincing in my eyes.

Ruble Noon
04-25-2012, 16:31
Romney’s life leads me to believe he is a conservative; all politicians in Massachusetts must pretend to be liberal.

Romney promised repeatedly to end Obama Care on day one. Obama vows to keep it at all costs.

Romney will keep this promise if he wants to win a 2nd term.

Romney the businessman and the Tea Party Congress will straighten out the budget.

Obama has been running the Country without a budget for 1,000 days; a dereliction of duty.

You do know that if the law isn't struck down by SCOTUS the earliest that he can issue waivers to the states would be 2017?

The Machinist
04-25-2012, 17:02
Do you realize that you're in agreement with George Soros, who's probably the biggest liberal/marxist on the planet?

Since there's no difference between Romney and Obama (so you say)
does that mean that you'd find no fault with a person that votes for Obama?

Will you vote for Obama?


..
As I've already told you, JB, I will never vote for the Kenyan squatter. The fact that a marxist troll like Soros would tacitly endorse Romney in this way should tell you a lot about the man you plan to vote for.

The Machinist
04-25-2012, 17:03
And I'm sure they will both nominate the same judges to the Federal & Supreme courts. . . :upeyes:

The effect of a good/bad president on the judicial system can last for decades. Even if all else was the same, the choices in judges would be enough to vote for one over another. .
I'm sure he would nominate Democrats like he did in his home state, and people like Lugar, Graham, and McCain will be right there to cheer them on.

Narkcop
04-26-2012, 04:52
I hope it's sooner than later when Soros AND Buffett BOTH take a dirt nap!