Paul won Indiana. [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : Paul won Indiana.


G-19
05-08-2012, 20:35
http://townhall.com/election-2012/primaries/state/in/













Oh wait, no he didn't. Heck he only beat Santorum by 2% of the votes, and he is not even running.

G-19
05-08-2012, 20:51
Oh crap, it gets worse. He also won West Virginia and North Carolina. :rofl:

http://nbcpolitics.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/08/11604397-romney-sweeps-trio-of-primaries-padding-delegate-total?lite

The Machinist
05-08-2012, 20:55
It does get worse. Romney is a liberal *********, and has zero chance of ousting the more liberal incumbent. Enjoy your victory.

G-19
05-08-2012, 20:58
It does get worse. Romney is a liberal *********, and has zero chance of ousting the more liberal incumbent. Enjoy your victory.

Oh, I am enjoying this victory. Just wait, more are coming. Ha ha ha ha ha

JBnTX
05-08-2012, 20:59
Oh my!

Maybe he's getting his second wind?
Getting ready to make his move?

:tease:

JBnTX
05-08-2012, 21:01
It does get worse. Romney is a liberal *********, and has zero chance of ousting the more liberal incumbent. Enjoy your victory.


"zero chance"?

Are you just banging the drum for Obama or do you really believe that?

G-19
05-08-2012, 21:05
Cue the "those states are stupid and hate the COTUS" comments. Oh, and let's not forget how "this would not have happened if we limited who can vote".

G29Reload
05-08-2012, 21:07
and has zero chance of ousting the more liberal incumbent. Enjoy your victory.

A bit of hyperbole, there, eh?

I'd say that's a bit silly.

Actually, latest horse race polls have Romney tied or ahead, and theres even a good chance of a landslide.

The electoral math is looking good, some now are even saying CO and NM are in play for Romney. FL is certain, OH is looking good, IN this time for sure, PA is seriously in doubt for BHO, NC is back in the R column and VA is looking good.

Economic numbers continue to sag, and now even BHO's personal numbers are dropping. He looks pathetic out on the campaign trail trying to sound the trumpet to complete failure, the politics of personal destruction are failing and backfiring with the dog munch story biting him in the ***.

I'd say Mittens has every chance of beating the socialist bastard.

The Machinist
05-08-2012, 21:09
"zero chance"?

Are you just banging the drum for Obama or do you really believe that?
Quick, JB. Tell us how many liberal Republican candidates ever beat a sitting Democrat.

Idiots who want socialism will vote for the guy who does a better job at it. Romney is Democrat-lite. Though that appeals to people like you and G-19, it doesn't hold true for most people. Romney is toast. Obama will have his second term, and you'll have a hand in it. Nice work.

Ruble Noon
05-08-2012, 21:09
"zero chance"?

Are you just banging the drum for Obama or do you really believe that?

http://i981.photobucket.com/albums/ae291/Streetmaster45/romneyrallydetroit212e1.jpg

http://i981.photobucket.com/albums/ae291/Streetmaster45/2012-05-05T174216Z_2110392184_GM1E85604ZL01_RTRMADP_3_OBAMA.jpg

G-19
05-08-2012, 21:12
Quick, JB. Tell us how many liberal Republican candidates ever beat a sitting Democrat.

Idiots who want socialism will vote for the guy who does a better job at it. Romney is Democrat-lite. Though that appeals to people like you and G-19, it doesn't hold true for most people. Romney is toast. Obama will have his second term, and you'll have a hand in it. Nice work.

If "most" people felt the way you think they do Paul would be winning. What will it take for you to see people don't buy your bunk.

RCP
05-08-2012, 21:17
We will actually have to wait til June 9th (Indianas convention) to see if Romney really won the delegates.

The Machinist
05-08-2012, 21:36
If "most" people felt the way you think they do Paul would be winning. What will it take for you to see people don't buy your bunk.
You would consider liberty and freedom as bunk. At any rate, Romney is a dud, and you know it. Maybe you guys can cheer for Lindsay Graham or Dick Lugar in 2016.

Ruble Noon
05-08-2012, 21:40
You would consider liberty and freedom as bunk. At any rate, Romney is a dud, and you know it. Maybe you guys can cheer for Lindsay Graham or Dick Lugar in 2016.

Or Hillary might switch parties and run as a republican in 2016. Seems she would fit with the way the party is headed.

Snowman92D
05-08-2012, 21:51
http://townhall.com/election-2012/primaries/state/in/

Oh wait, no he didn't. Heck he only beat Santorum by 2% of the votes, and he is not even running.

Ron Paul's people got their voters out to the polls. Gotta give 'em that. Apparently we didn't have enough stoners in this state to carry the day for him. :whistling:

RCP
05-08-2012, 22:11
Didn't Romney win Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, etc. too?

RCP
05-08-2012, 22:40
Nevada, maybe that was the State I was thinking of, Romney won and he secured all those delegates didn't he?

G19G20
05-09-2012, 01:03
And in related news.....

Romney is finishing with substantially lower numbers than McCain did in 2008 in these same "presumptive nominee primaries". Not sure I'd celebrate the most conservative candidate coming in second behind the presumptive nominee who garners even less enthusiasm than the previous losing candidate.

G-19
05-09-2012, 03:50
And yet, you are rabid about someone that barely beat a guy not even in the race anymore.

syntaxerrorsix
05-09-2012, 04:26
If "most" people felt the way you think they do Paul would be winning. What will it take for you to see people don't buy your bunk.

Further proof that the people will get the government they deserve.

Go team.. go.

PawDog
05-09-2012, 05:13
Rasmussen Polls for May 8, 2012 show Romney - 44%, Obama 39%, and Paul - 14%.

I don't know what polls some the the alleged "Paul Supporters" here are using, but most posting here are truly outing themselves for what they actually are - Obama supporters in sheep's (how appropriate) clothing.

Gary W Trott
05-09-2012, 06:15
Rasmussen Polls for May 8, 2012 show Romney - 44%, Obama 39%, and Paul - 14%.

I don't know what polls some the the alleged "Paul Supporters" here are using, but most posting here are truly outing themselves for what they actually are - Obama supporters in sheep's (how appropriate) clothing.
Not bad if Ron Paul should decide to do the highly improbable thing and run on a third party ticket.

For the May 8 report of Rasmussen polls pitting Paul and Romney head to head against Obama both do well with Romney doing better than Paul in most of these Rasmussen polls that I've seen over the past months.

From Real Clear Politics (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/elections/):

General Election: Romney vs. Obama - Obama 44, Romney 49 - Romney +5

General Election: Paul vs. Obama - Obama 42, Paul 42 - Tie

eracer
05-09-2012, 06:19
Ron Paul can't win, yet he is the President we need right now in order to stop this mad descent into hell.

What to do....what to do.

Gary W Trott
05-09-2012, 06:23
Ron Paul can't win, yet he is the President we need right now in order to stop this mad descent into hell.

What to do....what to do.
What to do is getting enough delegates to influence what the platform is and who the nominee will be...and that's what is in the process of being done.

Snowman92D
05-09-2012, 09:42
Ron Paul can't win, yet he is the President we need right now in order to stop this mad descent into hell.

What to do....what to do.

When in trouble, or in doubt...
Run in circles, scream and shout.

JBnTX
05-09-2012, 12:06
At any rate, Romney is a dud, and you know it..


If Romney is a dud and Paul is a loser, then please tell us what we should do.

Who should we vote for?

Instead of insults give us guidance in this matter.

Cavalry Doc
05-09-2012, 12:08
If Romney is a dud and Paul is a loser, then please tell us what we should do.

Who should we vote for?

Instead of insults give us guidance in this matter.

Just my opinion, but it is a well thought out opinion, see the sig line.