Senate Proposes Gun Control Amendment [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : Senate Proposes Gun Control Amendment


OregonXD
07-27-2012, 14:50
http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure

well, gee there is a surprise...the weseals are on the move..:whistling:

countrygun
07-27-2012, 14:54
No real surprise. Fineslime and her group will always seize every opportunity.

Gunnut 45/454
07-27-2012, 15:18
No compromise! No on any restrictions! What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand Chuck!:steamed:

wjv
07-27-2012, 15:59
would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition. . .

No "grandfathering" in that bill! That's an outright ban! To quote Feinstein, "Mr & Mrs America, turn them in."

Gunnut 45/454
07-27-2012, 16:04
wjv
Actually it did say after the bill was law-only 10 rounders! Still doesn't matter we will not except any restrictions what so ever! If anything there are many laws on the books that need to go bye bye! We need Constitutional carry NATION WIDE!:supergrin:

humanguerrilla
07-27-2012, 16:29
would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition. . .

No "grandfathering" in that bill! That's an outright ban! To quote Feinstein, "Mr & Mrs America, turn them in."

They were smart enough to not do that. The constitution can only absorb so much urination. No grandfathering would mean an easily reversed unconstitutional ex post facto law (Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3).

"Prohibitions.--Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:
``(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
[Page: S5403] GPO's PDF
``(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection. "

Write your senator now before this pile passes.

bear62
07-27-2012, 16:31
No real surprise. Fineslime and her group will always seize every opportunity.

Wonder why she has a concealed carry permit with all the hate she has for guns....:upeyes::upeyes:

DOC44
07-27-2012, 16:36
Wonder why she has a concealed carry permit with all the hate she has for guns....:upeyes::upeyes:

OK for me but not for thee...... I'm special, not a fly-over pee-on.

Doc44

pugman
07-27-2012, 16:36
would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition. . .

No "grandfathering" in that bill! That's an outright ban! To quote Feinstein, "Mr & Mrs America, turn them in."

Dear Federal Government.

Good Luck finding them*

Sincerely,

The firearm owning public

*I recently used all of mine as lures and lost all of them at the bottom of a lake

Cavalry Doc
07-27-2012, 16:43
would make it illegal to transfer or possess large capacity feeding devices such as gun magazines, belts, feed stripes and drums of more than 10 rounds of ammunition. . .

No "grandfathering" in that bill! That's an outright ban! To quote Feinstein, "Mr & Mrs America, turn them in."

Yikes!! :shocked:

Gonna have to start cleaning magazines in the canoe now too.

Cavalry Doc
07-27-2012, 16:47
They were smart enough to not do that. The constitution can only absorb so much urination. No grandfathering would mean an easily reversed unconstitutional ex post facto law (Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3).

"Prohibitions.--Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:
``(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
[Page: S5403] GPO's PDF
``(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection. "

Write your senator now before this pile passes.

No need to do that with mine, I come from a red state, he'd be tarred and feathered before I could send him a letter if he voted for this crap. I live in a red state. Any of the fence sitters out there I could write as an out of stater?

oldman11
07-27-2012, 17:33
No compromise! No on any restrictions! What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand Chuck!:steamed:
:goodpost: :agree:

Gundude
07-27-2012, 17:42
http://thehill.com/video/senate/240657-cybersecurity-bill-includes-gun-control-measure

well, gee there is a surprise...the weseals are on the move..:whistling:More symbolic gestures. Republicans had to shut up their base with the Holder comtempt vote, now Democrats have to shut up theirs with this. :yawn:

stevelyn
07-27-2012, 17:48
I was wondering when the usual suspects were going to try and exploit this.

Cavalry Doc
07-27-2012, 18:14
More symbolic gestures. Republicans had to shut up their base with the Holder comtempt vote, now Democrats have to shut up theirs with this. :yawn:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/images/bik3.gif



Left leaning noted.

CitizenOfDreams
07-27-2012, 18:14
Dear Federal Government.

Good Luck finding them

Dear Pugman,

We don't really care whether your guns are on the bottom of a lake or inside a PVC pipe in your backyard. Either way you will not be using them to defend yourself (and if you do, you will go to jail).

Sincerely yours, Federal Government.

Cavalry Doc
07-27-2012, 18:16
Anyone want to predict a spike in <10 round magazine prices? I already have a few, and might be investing in more.

DustyJacket
07-27-2012, 18:23
Those evil "feed stripes" - I keep them next to "The shoulder thing that goes up"........
[ I assume she is talking about stripper clips, but who knows]


"He also said average Americans don’t need an assault weapon to go hunting or protect themselves."

But maybe we need them to protect ourselves from politicians.......

Bruce H
07-27-2012, 18:39
Idiot feinstein, drop dead *****.

callihan_44
07-27-2012, 18:44
bu bu but you dont need more than a single shot for hunting! they can kiss my @55!

aircarver
07-27-2012, 18:51
This is why we can never lose sight of the fact that the commie-crats are snakes .....:steamed:

.

jakebrake
07-27-2012, 19:05
To quote Feinstein, "Mr & Mrs America, turn them in."

the response, "come and get 'em, skank" comes to mind

good luck finding them

G22Dude
07-27-2012, 20:27
I sincerely hope this move guarantees that the Dems lose the Senate

DOC44
07-27-2012, 20:38
I sincerely hope this move guarantees that the Dems lose the Senate

How many senators who are up for election in 2012 are in southern states?

Doc44

G22Dude
07-27-2012, 20:45
How many senators who are up for election in 2012 are in southern states?

Doc44

I honestly couldn't tell bro, have to do some research

bear62
07-27-2012, 21:00
I sincerely hope this move guarantees that the Dems lose the Senate

Amen, brother, amen.............:wavey:

DOC44
07-27-2012, 21:04
How many senators who are up for election in 2012 are in southern states?

Doc44

I honestly couldn't tell bro, have to do some research



Here are the Democrats up in 2012:
■Daniel Akaka, Hawaii
■Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico. How’s that border, Senator?
■Sherrod Brown, Ohio. Ohio’s looking pretty red these days
■Joe Manchin, West Virginia. Aw, I just got here.
■Maria Cantwell, Washington
■Benjamin Cardin, Maryland
■Thomas Carper, Delaware. Win one for Christine
■Robert Casey, Jr., Pennsylvania
■Kent Conrad, North Dakota
■Diane Feinstein, California
■Kirsten Gillibrand, New York. We’re baaack. If we can just keep Al D’Amato from stabbing us in the back we might put up a decent candidate to beat an easy target
■Amy Klobuchar, Minnesota. How does Senator Michelle Bachmann sound?
■Herb Kohl, Wisconsin. As goes Feingold, so goes Kohl?
■Claire McCaskill, Missouri
■Robert Menendez, New Jersey. Chris Christie country may be ready for a change
■Ben Nelson, Nebraska. Best known for the Cornhusker kickback to buy his vote on ObamaCare
■Bill Nelson, Florida. Does Marco Rubio have a brother or a sister?
■Debbie Stabenow, Michigan. Can we trade her for General Motors?
■Jon Tester, Montana
■Jim Webb, Virginia. He may be the last trace of blue in the state
■Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island

We may not be in the majority, but all we need to do on most legislation is to bring over two, three or four of these folks to pass bills. They may want to have a whiff of bipartisanship on their resume when they face the voters.

Here are the two independents:
■Joseph Lieberman, Connecticut. We love you Joe, but except for Isreal and National Security, you are still rather blue
■Bernard Sanders, Socialist. Seriously, a Socialist. Can we stop saying that the left doesn’t believe in socialism?

Here are the Republican seats we will need to defend:
■Scott Brown, Massachusetts
■John Barrasso, Wyoming
■Bob Corker, Tennessee
■John Ensign, Nevada
■Orrin Hatch, Utah
■Kay Bailey Hutchison, Texas
■Jon Kyl, Arizona
■Richard Lugar, Indiana
■Olympia Snowe, Maine. Is there a Tea Party in Maine. Can someone give them a wakeup call, please?
■Roger Wicker, Mississippi

http://libertyslifeline.com/2010/11/04/next-up-the-senate-class-of-2012/

looks like about 6 democrats and 5 republicans would have their election impacted by voter attitude on gun control if became an issue.
Doc44

QNman
07-27-2012, 21:16
They were smart enough to not do that. The constitution can only absorb so much urination. No grandfathering would mean an easily reversed unconstitutional ex post facto law (Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3).

"Prohibitions.--Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:
``(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
[Page: S5403] GPO's PDF
``(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection. "

Write your senator now before this pile passes.

No sense in that here either. McCaskill is one with the Borg. She will vote with the collective, regardless of any sane pleas. Roy Blunt will vote against it to prove he's conservative.

Just ordered 10 more mags. I hope they aren't stolen by the neighbor kids when UPS leaves them on the stoop. That would be a shame.

QNman
07-27-2012, 21:21
http://libertyslifeline.com/2010/11/04/next-up-the-senate-class-of-2012/

looks like about 6 democrats and 5 republicans would have their election impacted by voter attitude on gun control if became an issue.
Doc44

Claire is at the bottom of the cherry tree. Hopefully, this tree comes down (politically speaking).

But not to worry. I've been assured by the Internet citizenry that to vote for this rubbish would be political suicide. There's clearly no WAY this could be voted on after November, during the lame duck session. :whistling: