Republicans, it's time to focus [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : Republicans, it's time to focus


countrygun
08-14-2012, 11:25
We are all pretty happy with the choice of Paul Ryan but we should not get lost in that euphoria. That is what the Democratic machine wants. We must learn the lessons from the past and not let the libtards set or agenda and make us react to them. It is time to put them on the run.

Remember the last election. The Dims made Palin, the VP candidate, the focus of the publicity and the attacks and marginalized McCain even more than he managed to himself. This made him appear almost insignificant in the campaign. This was done deliberately and put forth bu the liberal spin media. We cannot let that happen again.

We must quit our wasted bickering with that branch of the Democratic Underground's "shadow warrior" program called the "Ron Paul" wing. The only ones left are the DU handlers that keep a handful of deluded losers fired up and causing us to waste energy on them.

Notice what is happening here and remember it, remember it well. Nobody is daring to champion Obama at all, they have nothing to work with in that bag. All they can do is take cheap shots at the Republicans that is why they have made such good use of the Rongoloids for that purpose. Let us not be diffused by their tactics. Let us stick to putting forth the positive outline that Mitt Romney has put forth.

The day he announced that Paul ryan was his choice for VP, Mitt Romney put forth five points that he feels are key to a prosperous and secure Country. These are important and many on the left are worried about them (this will be evident in their denials. remember, when they post on the internet they are under no obligation to be honest with conservative "infidels").


1. Energy independent North America using all resources including renewables.


The Obamans are very weak on this given that Obie is keeping us from using the resources we have right here in this Country in terms of oil and he is doubly weak because of the amount of the stimulus money, OUR TAX MONEY he wasted on failed "green" companies. It is as if he want's to keep us dependent on foreign fossil fuels.

2. Education, give our children the skills to succeed.

This is going to hit the liberal socialist hard in a number of ways. It is no secret that the American Education System is broken. It is a self perpetuating monster. Why, why does it require a college degree to make a living? Why, oh why, do colleges have to have remedial classes to bring students, who were supposedly "prepared for college, since everyone needs it" up to a college level?

The roots of the problem are in the reenforced in efficiency nurtured by the NEA and carried forward by teachers unions and now championed by the conglomerate corporation called the SEIU. Union inefficiency has done to the education system what in did to Detroit's auto industry. The hard core socialist liberals will really scream about this ox getting gored Watch for claims of thousands of illiterates not able to find work, as opposed to thousands paying for college degrees and unable to find work.


3. Make international trade fair to America.

This is going to hit the global socialist wing of the liberal faction hard. Yes America has rights in the world. America deserves respect in global trade. It will probably also mean that we will have President who doesn't bow to anyone who will stand still long enough. We do not need to do business with the world on their terms exclusively. We do not need to continually "take one for the international team"


4. Reduce government spending and balance the budget.

It goes without saying that this should be a goal of every Adnministration. When, tell me when, have you heard Obama even mention the concept? Where is his plan for this? Can you really say that he even considers it worth mentioning? At the rate he has spent, it can't be on his mind very much. BTW Where is his plan for balancing the budget? he has had 3 1/2 years where is it?



5. Support small business. Make it good to build a business again.


Small business is what America grew on. Despite what the socialists tell you, every business in America started out as a small one somewhere. The best part about it, for those with any knowledge on the subject, is that it doesn't take Government to MAKE it happen it takes Government getting out of the way to LET it happen. The down side for socialists is that nobody gets a guarantee of succes in capitalism. It's a risk. But bearin mind, despite what the naysayers are chanting, right now there is capital available in the Country as soon as those holding feel safer than they do under Obama. This is money that is already out there that can be used to create taxpaying business and jobs WITHOUT the Government meddling and growing in the meddling process.

This ladies and gentlemen, is what truly terrifies the socialists of the left. Independent business making people prosperous with big brothers help. It is Kryptonite to socialism and why they must try to throw every roadblock they can in the way.


Republicans, we have a tough few months ahead, but we can win if we take the helm and hold to the course, and we can create a better future. sty the course and don't be distrcted by what the libtards put out there for the purpose of distraction.

Ruble Noon
08-14-2012, 14:35
We are all pretty happy with the choice of Paul Ryan but we should not get lost in that euphoria. That is what the Democratic machine wants. We must learn the lessons from the past and not let the libtards set or agenda and make us react to them. It is time to put them on the run.

Remember the last election. The Dims made Palin, the VP candidate, the focus of the publicity and the attacks and marginalized McCain even more than he managed to himself. This made him appear almost insignificant in the campaign. This was done deliberately and put forth bu the liberal spin media. We cannot let that happen again.

We must quit our wasted bickering with that branch of the Democratic Underground's "shadow warrior" program called the "Ron Paul" wing. The only ones left are the DU handlers that keep a handful of deluded losers fired up and causing us to waste energy on them.

Notice what is happening here and remember it, remember it well. Nobody is daring to champion Obama at all, they have nothing to work with in that bag. All they can do is take cheap shots at the Republicans that is why they have made such good use of the Rongoloids for that purpose. Let us not be diffused by their tactics. Let us stick to putting forth the positive outline that Mitt Romney has put forth.

The day he announced that Paul ryan was his choice for VP, Mitt Romney put forth five points that he feels are key to a prosperous and secure Country. These are important and many on the left are worried about them (this will be evident in their denials. remember, when they post on the internet they are under no obligation to be honest with conservative "infidels").





:rofl::rofl:

:animlol:

countrygun
08-14-2012, 14:37
:rofl::rofl:

:animlol:



High praise from you indeed. I'm flattered. Thank You

Ruble Noon
08-14-2012, 14:49
High praise from you indeed. I'm flattered. Thank You

Glad to be of service. Trust me, I really enjoy your posts because they are just so damn delusional that they are laugh your ass off funny. :rofl:

jakebrake
08-14-2012, 14:51
Glad to be of service. Trust me, I really enjoy your posts because they are just so damn delusional that they are laugh your ass off funny. :rofl:

how's that delegate count going?

Ruble Noon
08-14-2012, 15:22
how's that delegate count going?


Which one is that? I'm pretty sure Johnson has the Libertarian position locked down.

jakebrake
08-14-2012, 15:29
Which one is that? I'm pretty sure Johnson has the Libertarian position locked down.

i would kinda hope.

barbedwiresmile
08-14-2012, 16:36
I was just listening to clips of Ryan going back and forth with the Bernank over the Fed's "dual mandate" of managing inflation (lol) and the employment rate. And I'm not sure if Ryan A) doesn't understand how a central bank operates (which is certainly possible for one of our political spokesmodels, despite their tenure), or B) is wickedly cynical in his pandering.

Regarding the OP, I'm still waiting for an example of any spending that the GOP has actually cut. And I'm trying to reconcile the deficit hawk theme (focus group tested, tried and true) with votes for trillion dollar military adventurism, TARP, the rape of auto industry investors, Medicare D, and DHS expansionism. Not to mention that the deficit grows under Ryan's plan.

Brucev
08-14-2012, 16:49
Never entered my mind to vote for anyone other than the Republican candidate. Only a fool would do otherwise.

m51
08-14-2012, 16:58
Mittens desperation pick of Ryan, to deflect the media from his tax returns, will come back to haunt him. The only people happy of the Ryan pick are those that will vote republican no matter who he picked. In this seemingly tight race, he needed to pick a moderate to win over the undecided and he needs all the undecided he can get. If he were going for the win, not the one hard line republicans want, he would have picked Christie. Remember I said for the win, and isn't that what it's all about?

countrygun
08-14-2012, 16:59
I was just listening to clips of Ryan going back and forth with the Bernank over the Fed's "dual mandate" of managing inflation (lol) and the employment rate. And I'm not sure if Ryan A) doesn't understand how a central bank operates (which is certainly possible for one of our political spokesmodels, despite their tenure), or B) is wickedly cynical in his pandering.

Regarding the OP, I'm still waiting for an example of any spending that the GOP has actually cut. And I'm trying to reconcile the deficit hawk theme (focus group tested, tried and true) with votes for trillion dollar military adventurism, TARP, the rape of auto industry investors, Medicare D, and DHS expansionism. Not to mention that the deficit grows under Ryan's plan.


And as I predicted it's about RYAN to you. Not one mention of the Presidential candidate, you know, ROMNEY. You will notice he mentions ryan 3 times and no mention of Romney?

Like I said folks, they are going to try to do what they did to McCain and Palin.


You will also notice the Rongoloids and the so-called Libertarians showed up to flog their dead horses.

I could have written the script for the responses so far, come to think of it, I did in my OP. Nothing like a little "proof of concept".

I am rather pleased with myself, I teased the dogs and they came out barking.:supergrin:

barbedwiresmile
08-14-2012, 17:33
Long on ad hom and short on addressing the facts I have provided. That has been your trend over the several threads on Mr Ryan. I hope your boy Romney has better game than you. Doubtless you will be drawing on your extensive capital markets experience to intelligently discuss Ryan's budget proposal and his recent confusing voting record.

As for your boy Mr Romney, the record of his policy positions is fairly clear: more spending, more pandering, more debt.

It is impressive, however, the lengths republicans will go to in order to justify their support of an anti-2A, socialized medicine advocate for president.

series1811
08-14-2012, 17:43
Mittens desperation pick of Ryan, to deflect the media from his tax returns, will come back to haunt him. The only people happy of the Ryan pick are those that will vote republican no matter who he picked. In this seemingly tight race, he needed to pick a moderate to win over the undecided and he needs all the undecided he can get. If he were going for the win, not the one hard line republicans want, he would have picked Christie. Remember I said for the win, and isn't that what it's all about?

Yeah, but you're a liberal Democrat. You wouldn't vote Republican no matter who they picked. So what's your point?

countrygun
08-14-2012, 17:52
Long on ad hom and short on addressing the facts I have provided. That has been your trend over the several threads on Mr Ryan. I hope your boy Romney has better game than you. Doubtless you will be drawing on your extensive capital markets experience to intelligently discuss Ryan's budget proposal and his recent confusing voting record.

As for your boy Mr Romney, the record of his policy positions is fairly clear: more spending, more pandering, more debt.

It is impressive, however, the lengths republicans will go to in order to justify their support of an anti-2A, socialized medicine advocate for president.


I don't find his voting record confusing sotrry you do.

Then again, my thread here is aimed at Republicans and since you are part of the group that intends to keep Obama in the White House, you really aren't showing me that Obama has any great plan, and I , for one, don't like the direction he is heading the Country. I don't like Biden's recent racist remarks and I want him out too.

It is just that simple the only way to get Obama out is Romney.

beforeobamabans
08-14-2012, 17:59
Regardless of what one thinks about Ryan, there can be no doubting that he has improved Romney as a campaigner in just 72 hours. The juxtaposition of Obama in Iowa touting windmills vs. Romney in front of a gang of union Ohio coal miners was priceless. Pro-coal will win over key segments of Ohio, PA, W. VA, Virginia, and Kentucky.

Then there was Ryan's interview where R/R take their first steps toward turning the tables on the Medicare debate. Obamacare raids $700B away from Medicare. He is the one destroying it to pay for the uninsured who have paid nothing into it. This is a winning message, just repeat loud and often. When was the last time a GOP campaign co-oped the Medicare issue to it's advantage? In the meantime, in Danville, Virginia, the crazy uncle in the attic (they actually called the sitting VP that tonight on the news, folks) was going on about how his audience was going to help him carry North Carolina??? And insulting his mostly black audience with a reference to Republicans putting them back in chains in his fake southern accent. Embarrassing, absolutely embarrassing. Even Obama has to kicking himself for not making a change in running mates now.

Like it or not (and I have to admit to enjoying it immensely) the Republican ticket has seized the momentum, completely reversed the discourse from anti-Romney to pro-Republican agenda and the Dems have nothing left to fight back with. No exciting VP announcement. Only a lame three day convention that will only trot out the same old tired smear jobs. Oh and when was the last time a white Democratic nominee for president got his convention cut from four days to three? I smell a little racism there.

Just watch the polls start to swing.

barbedwiresmile
08-14-2012, 18:00
I don't find his voting record confusing sotrry you do.



So, like Ryan, you support TARP?

Mind you a big recipient, JP Morgan, recently lost a few billion at their prop desk. And Goldman continues to front-run retail client's positions in antithesis of their public advice. Tax payer backstop of private losses leads to interesting behavior indeed. So please consider your answer.

Ruble Noon
08-14-2012, 18:02
I don't find his voting record confusing sotrry you do.

Then again, my thread here is aimed at Republicans and since you are part of the group that intends to keep Obama in the White House, you really aren't showing me that Obama has any great plan, and I , for one, don't like the direction he is heading the Country. I don't like Biden's recent racist remarks and I want him out too.

It is just that simple the only way to get Obama out is Romney.

I'm sure that you agree with Ryan's voting record as well as Romney's governing record, being the neocon that you are.

Sorry, I forgot that you don't like being called a neocon or statist. How about faux conservative?

barbedwiresmile
08-14-2012, 18:02
Beforeobamabans, what happened to you. You clearly see this charade for what it is based on your posting history. Have you succumbed to fatigue and given up? It's understandable. But hold fast, my friend. Do not grant legitimacy to the kleptocracy.

m51
08-14-2012, 18:04
Yeah, but you're a liberal Democrat. You wouldn't vote Republican no matter who they picked. So what's your point?

I am more a centrist, but I was looking in the rules of this forum and nowhere did I see that I can't express an opinion other than your close minded one. Did you see a rule here that I didn't? Grow up, you are the exact reason we will have 4 more years of Obama, close minded thinking. Get the blinders off, it will help.

barbedwiresmile
08-14-2012, 18:06
Never entered my mind to vote for anyone other than the Republican candidate. Only a fool would do otherwise.

And that's exactly why the GOP does nothing to earn your vote. They don't need to. You don't even factor into their thinking.

m51
08-14-2012, 18:09
And that's exactly why the GOP does nothing to earn your vote. They don't need to. You don't even factor into their thinking.

That makes a lot of sense... Very true..

beforeobamabans
08-14-2012, 18:20
Beforeobamabans, what happened to you. You clearly see this charade for what it is based on your posting history. Have you succumbed to fatigue and given up? It's understandable. But hold fast, my friend. Do not grant legitimacy to the kleptocracy.

What happened to me is that my primary candidate got eliminated. The American people do not agree with my vision of our suicidal debt trajectory. After mourning this turn of events for a while, I've had to take a fresh look at the actual choices we will have in November. The choices in front of all of us are now: Obama, Romney, Johnson or sit out.

I won't sit out because that's not me and I have a lot of state and local candidates I want to vote for. I won't vote for Johnson because I don't like him personally and admit it or not, it is wasting your vote. That leaves us with Obama and Romney/Ryan. Obama is anathema to everything I believe in. And while R/R are far from perfect, there is no question that they are eons closer than Obama to the principles that led me to support Ron Paul in the primaries. Politics is the art of the possible. An austere, fix-it-now message has proven to be too strong a medicine for the American electorate at this time. I disagree with a poster a few days ago who said that he wouldn't "compromise his principles" by voting for one of the only choices we're going to get. I don't look at it that way. I didn't pick the finalists so the lineup being offered has nothing to do with my principles. My principles dictate that I support those closest to my ideals. Unfortunately, this cycle, they're not very close but one is a lot closer than the other.

I also want to say that I'm sick of the continuing Ron Paul bashing in this forum. Let it go fellas. You won. Act like grown ups now and move on to the real battle at hand. Defeat Obama.

countrygun
08-14-2012, 18:26
I'm sure that you agree with Ryan's voting record as well as Romney's governing record, being the neocon that you are.

Sorry, I forgot that you don't like being called a neocon or statist. How about faux conservative?


You must have learned your labeling technique from Alinsky himself.

Such a convenient and handy way to direct the narural bigotry that dwells in the liberal heart.

Be true to your roots and use the original "the Man" or "One of the Establishment" like the liberals you learned from.

The Machinist
08-14-2012, 19:00
Where is his plan for balancing the budget?
Where's Romney's plan? Oh, he doesn't have one either? Imagine that. Yet another similarity shared between both of the stooges.

jakebrake
08-14-2012, 19:03
Where's Romney's plan? Oh, he doesn't have one either? Imagine that. Yet another similarity shared between both of the stooges.

where's your boys plan?

and, again...how's that delegate count going?

The Machinist
08-14-2012, 19:28
where's your boys plan?

and, again...how's that delegate count going?
Paul's plan was to cut one Trillion in his first year. Romney's plan is to do what again? Cut nothing and add more debt?

Guss
08-14-2012, 19:52
About your 5 points...

1. Petroleum prices are beyond our control. It's a global market and our country's output cannot possibly increase enough to bring down the global price. To change the prices, we would have to bring in government control instead of letting the free market take its course.

2. Education - Only a few areas have a problem with runaway union control. That's a state problem they'll have to take care of at the state level or continue to pay the price for it. Eventually the states with a problem will catch on.

3. International Trade - Yep, Congress needs to reverse course on this. Congress took away our trade protections, and it will take Congress to bring it back.

4. Reduce spending and balance the budget - Everyone agrees on this, but we're never going to get agreement as to how much and how fast. H. Ross Perot warned us when he ran for President, but no one listened. If we had paid down our debts in the prosperous times, this current recession would not have been so hard. Even a conservative like Ronald Reagan was not able to pay down the debt during prosperity, so it's not going to get paid off during a recession.

5. Support small business - Small businesses can and do succeed and there are lots of them. They stand ready to expand as soon as the demand is there. Sadly, the consuming public is out of buying power.

Ruble Noon
08-14-2012, 20:30
You must have learned your labeling technique from Alinsky himself.

Such a convenient and handy way to direct the narural bigotry that dwells in the liberal heart.

Be true to your roots and use the original "the Man" or "One of the Establishment" like the liberals you learned from.

Liberal heart? :upeyes: I'm voting for a conservative and you're voting for whom? A liberal gun banning progressive socialized medicine rino.

countrygun
08-14-2012, 20:45
Liberal heart? :upeyes: I'm voting for a conservative and you're voting for whom? A liberal gun banning progressive socialized medicine rino.


No, if you vote as you "claim" you are going to help put Obama back in office. I don't think that makes you close to a conservative.

Oh BTW tell your friends a DU that, around here, people don't automatically flinch when someone throws out the "gun control" accusation. You liberals seem to think that is all that matters on a gun forum at that we can be led by one accusation on one issue.

The Machinist
08-14-2012, 20:53
I see countrygun repeatedly projecting his liberal worldview onto others by accusing them of being what he is. To wit, he's voting for a liberal this November. I think we all know who the real lefty is. Bring on the the Saul Alinsky smear tactics, again, countrygun! Strut your liberal stuff!

countrygun
08-14-2012, 20:58
I see countrygun repeatedly projecting his liberal worldview onto others by accusing them of being what he is. To wit, he's voting for a liberal this November. I think we all know who the real lefty is. Bring on the the Saul Alinsky smear tactics, again, countrygun! Strut your liberal stuff!


What a clever little one you are. I hope it really burns when we replace Obama despite your efforts.

countrygun
08-14-2012, 21:22
Hey "Machinist" since we are both liberals and want Obama to win, why don't I give up supporting the one person who can beat him and spend my efforts trying to get people to vote for a loser, who openly lied about being a Republican, tried to use the party and then turned his back on it when he failed and......

Didn't even get enough votes to carry his own district in the primary..

Whaddya think? Think we can find enough people dumb enough to vote for that guy so we can get Obama back in office?

This supporting Romney thing didn't work too well for me I'm afraid. He looks like he may actually win. we had better start beasting the drum real loud for our loser don't ya think?

Let's tell everyone that voting for him will be a....Hmmm what can we call it......?????

I know, we'll call it a "Moral Victory for conservatism" if Obama is sworn in.

There have got to be enough fools to buy it.

Ruble Noon
08-14-2012, 21:25
Hey "Machinist" since we are both liberals and want Obama to win, why don't I give up supporting the one person who can beat him and spend my efforts trying to get people to vote for a loser, who openly lied about being a Republican, tried to use the party and then turned his back on it when he failed and......

Didn't even get enough votes to carry his own district in the primary..

Whaddya think? Think we can find enough people dumb enough to vote for that guy so we can get Obama back in office?

This supporting Romney thing didn't work too well for me I'm afraid. He looks like he may actually win. we had better start beasting the drum real loud for our loser don't ya think?

Let's tell everyone that voting for him will be a....Hmmm what can we call it......?????

I know, we'll call it a "Moral Victory for conservatism" if Obama is sworn in.

There have got to be enough fools to buy it.

Huffing is bad for you.

countrygun
08-14-2012, 21:40
Huffing is bad for you.


But it helps me think like you:crying:

The Machinist
08-15-2012, 05:24
You're really becoming unhinged. It was bad enough that you thought supporting the NDAA, TARP, government mandates, and gun bans made you a conservative, but now you're rolling around on the floor like a little kid throwing a tantrum.

series1811
08-15-2012, 05:57
Liberals coming here and telling us to vote for a third party if we just can't bring ourselves to actually vote for O-nothing seems to be all they have left.

It's asymmetrical campaigning (think pushing Perot or Nader to drain off the vote) and it is telling when you think about it.

They know you just can't sell Obama with a record to anyone over 20 years old.

walt cowan
08-15-2012, 07:22
wait for the convention...if paul doesn't win the gop ticket or run for third party...gary johnson gets my vote. stop feeding the club members and starving you children.

kirgi08
08-15-2012, 08:37
RP runs obama wins.'08.

engineer151515
08-15-2012, 08:57
Obama needs to be defeated in his re-election. A Socialist unrestrained by the need for re-election, a propagandist supporting media, and a flaccid Congress might just finish off what we know about American freedom - forever.

It's really that simple.

"To sit back hoping that someday, some way, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last - but eat you he will."
Ronald Reagan

You Ron Paul supporters may never see your goals reached if Obama is re-elected. Ever. You will be taxed, government controlled, regulated and ostracized into oblivion. The seriousness of this political threat cannot be understated. It is every bit as serious as any battle fought in war.

"But if we fail, then the whole world... all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age, made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science" - Winston Churchill.

GAFinch
08-15-2012, 09:37
If you want the Dear Leader to be re-elected in order to get your hard left social and foreign policies enacted, you're a lying, dirty hippie that Republicans should ignore. If you want the Dear Leader to be re-elected in order to spark some new American Revolution, you're an awful human being that Republicans should ignore. Actively working to create violence when a peaceful alternative still exists is morally reprehensible, particularly if the outcome isn't guaranteed. Even if a revolution happens and it is successful, what makes you guys think that this country would be set up in a libertarian model instead of restoring the originial Christian-based one?

Republicans are successfully reforming our own party and don't need malcontents running around demoralizing us and sabotaging our efforts. Libertarians don't have a monopoly on fiscal responsibility. We don't have to turn into cheap liberals in order to balance the budget. We don't need arrogant, "enlightened" elites telling us what to believe and what not to believe. We're not stupid. We learn from our previous mistakes and adapt. We've broken the media monopoly and have a decent chance of turning this country around.

walt cowan
08-15-2012, 09:40
Obama needs to be defeated in his re-election. An Socialist unrestrained by the need for re-election, a propagandist supporting media, and a flaccid Congress might just finish off what we know about American freedom - forever.

It's really that simple.

"To sit back hoping that someday, some way, someone will make things right is to go on feeding the crocodile, hoping he will eat you last - but eat you he will."
Ronald Reagan

You Ron Paul supporters may never see your goals reached if Obama is re-elected. Ever. You will be taxed, government controlled, regulated and ostracized into oblivion. The seriousness of this political threat cannot be understated. It is every bit as serious as any battle fought in war.

"But if we fail, then the whole world... all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new the lights of perverted science" - Winston Churchill.

and knowing that the rnc gives you a pair of rinos? maybe they want the world as you know it...to fail. bush,doyle,mccain and now mit.:dunno:

m51
08-15-2012, 09:58
Liberals coming here and telling us to vote for a third party if we just can't bring ourselves to actually vote for O-nothing seems to be all they have left.

It's asymmetrical campaigning (think pushing Perot or Nader to drain off the vote) and it is telling when you think about it.

They know you just can't sell Obama with a record to anyone over 20 years old.

Folks we have a BINGO!!!

countrygun
08-15-2012, 10:56
Liberals coming here and telling us to vote for a third party if we just can't bring ourselves to actually vote for O-nothing seems to be all they have left.

It's asymmetrical campaigning (think pushing Perot or Nader to drain off the vote) and it is telling when you think about it.

They know you just can't sell Obama with a record to anyone over 20 years old.


To top it off they can't sell the third party thing to anyone over 30 who feeds themself with fork.

countrygun
08-15-2012, 11:10
You're really becoming unhinged. It was bad enough that you thought supporting the NDAA, TARP, government mandates, and gun bans made you a conservative, but now you're rolling around on the floor like a little kid throwing a tantrum.

Kid throwing a tantrum?

Mitt Romney won Ron Paul didn't even win his home district in a primary. They talk about usurping the Party convention to get their way.

Oh yah, lotta room to talk there.

Harbour
08-15-2012, 12:47
And that's exactly why the GOP does nothing to earn your vote. They don't need to. You don't even factor into their thinking.

Yep, that is the inevitable result of the "lesser of two evils" voting mentality.

Their vote has been reduced to meaninglessness, but they still "feel good" about casting their ballot. Gosh, that is so close to the "libtard" mindset.

"Focus hard" you "good Republicans." Too bad you are no longer focused on reversing the direction America has been going since Reagan left office.

kirgi08
08-15-2012, 12:51
I want obama out,once that's done we can revert ta a tri-county type of government.'08.

countrygun
08-15-2012, 12:52
Yep, that is the inevitable result of the "lesser of two evils" voting mentality.

Their vote has been reduced to meaninglessness, but they still "feel good" about casting their ballot. Gosh, that is so close to the "libtard" mindset.

"Focus hard" you "good Republicans." Too bad you are no longer focused on reversing the direction America has been going since Reagan left office.


Keep the comedy rolling folks.

The people whose votes will accomplish nothing but assist Obama are going to try and take the moral high ground"?

You guys are such kidders:supergrin:

walt cowan
08-15-2012, 17:06
if voting changed anything...it would be illegal.

countrygun
08-15-2012, 17:31
if voting changed anything...it would be illegal.


Falsehood, but thanks for playing.

Ruble Noon
08-15-2012, 20:40
if voting changed anything...it would be illegal.

I have heard that somewhere. :wavey: