View Full Version : How Many of You REALLY Think Romney Will Win??
Providence
10-27-2012, 19:43
All kinds of things are being said to suppress votes for Romney.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/27/Romney-Increases-lead-In-national-swing-state-poll
This will come down to who votes. If we vote we win. I don't care what the dims say. If we go out and vote, we win. This is about ending the 4 year nightmare! This is about correcting a national mistake. It isn't about abortion or the made-up "war on women." It isn't about binders or big bird. It is about the destruction of our economy, the debacle in Benghazi, the corrupt gifting of money to "green" energy companies, Fast and Furious, a justice dept. run amuck, the EPA run amuck, and many more scandals! Don't like one of the scandals? Pick another. There are plenty! But all of these have resulted in a failed presidency.
But that is nothing but a rant unless we get out and vote. Celebrate your ability to make your statement. Vote!
http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m145/The_Shootist/Public%20Pix/obamatoast.png
Grabbrass
10-27-2012, 21:32
If you're not for protecting women against voilence, then you are for perpetrators who offend women.
Or, maybe you're for equally protecting all persons against violence. There's something in the Constitution about that I think ... oh yeah, the equal protection clause.
ROMNEY WILL WIN!!! The big Os popularity has dropped 7 points in 3 days. His ship is sinking!:rofl::rofl:
Boot Stomper
10-28-2012, 17:46
I don't believe people are stupid enough to let Obama have 4 more years. So yea, I think Romney will win in a landslide.
I wish I had your optimism. I think most people are distracted, don't pay attention, don't care or just plain stupid. With that said, I pray you are right.
Smithers
10-28-2012, 17:53
Mitt Romney can't win this election. Mitt Romney can make the good argument about the economy and the debt, but unfortunately for him he's also running against a sleeping giant. Woman's rights.
If anyone doesn't think a Mitt Romney win can and will have an effect on Rowe v Wade is dangerously misinformed. Whether that effect will be positive or negative depends on your perspective.
The Right is going to perceive a Romney win as a mandate for agenda's far beyond the concepts of debt reduction and tax reform. The Dem's hold a lead in the Senate, now but heaven help my daughters and granddaughters if that should change.
If you lack the internal organs to grow, nurish then birth human life (IMHO) you really don't have a say in the matter. You literally didn't build that. GTF out of my babies womb.
Mitt Romney would be glad to sign personhood amendments and the Republimens would be happy to write them. Don't kid yourself otherwise.
My goodness, a scare monger.
You want to see what will happen to your rights?
Allow obama a few SC nominations.
ilgunguygt
10-28-2012, 18:03
My goodness, a scare monger.
You want to see what will happen to your rights?
Allow obama a few SC nominations.
Just someone too foolish to look past the next election. Facts are those kind of people really dont give a rip about real freedoms anyway. As long as you can have an abortion and have a protest your freedoms are covered in many peoples books.
I heard on the radio this morning, NC was solid in the Romney column but now is obamas. Hope this is not a trend:crying:
Providence
10-29-2012, 14:14
I heard on the radio this morning, NC was solid in the Romney column but now is obamas. Hope this is not a trend:crying:
This is meant to suppress Romney votes. I call it propaganda... or if I'm in a hurry, BS!
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/north_carolina/election_2012_north_carolina_president
I heard on the radio this morning, NC was solid in the Romney column but now is obamas. Hope this is not a trend:crying:
Stop listening to NPR
Suffolk University pollster David Paleologos, whose polls are aggregated into mainstream averages to show where the presidential race stands in the swing states, said he’s finished polling in Florida, North Carolina and Virginia because President Obama has no shot of winning those states.
“I think in places like North Carolina, Virginia and Florida, we’ve already painted those red, we’re not polling any of those states again,” Paleologos said Tuesday night on Fox’s "The O’Reilly Factor." “We’re focusing on the remaining states.”
G29Reload
10-29-2012, 14:42
I see a solid Romney victory forming.
I do not expect him to get NV. Possible but the union influence in that state is too strong.
Romney WILL get:
CO +4
IA +2-4
WI (possibly) Tie, up in likely voters
OH (possibly) now up 2%, Trending Romney
NH +2-4%
VA +2-4%
NC +6%
FL +2-6%
271-290 votes.
National trend is there
Swing state aggregate is there.
Individual polling is there by swing state.
NV, MN, WI, PA may be in play and could be icing on the cake.
Unlocked
10-29-2012, 15:03
NV, MN, WI, PA may be in play and could be icing on the cake.
I agree that a Romney win is in the works. I think WI just might surprise everyone and go red. But I doubt PA does. I don't want to get my hopes up, but I have a real good feeling.
Hailstorm
10-29-2012, 15:16
I always feel in Michigan. My vote doesn't mean anything when you have so many idiots.
When it comes to who wins. I suppose it will depend on how many dead people vote.
Providence
10-29-2012, 16:13
I always feel in Michigan. My vote doesn't mean anything when you have so many idiots.
When it comes to who wins. I suppose it will depend on how many dead people vote.
You guys in occupied territory have it rough. I've been there and it isn't fun!
Providence
10-29-2012, 16:26
I always feel in Michigan. My vote doesn't mean anything when you have so many idiots.
When it comes to who wins. I suppose it will depend on how many dead people vote.
Did you know Michigan is now a toss-up state? Keep hope alive!
Did you know Michigan is now a toss-up state? Keep hope alive!
So is Ohio. I am optimistic.
Whooo boy, when Romney is elected on the 6th, I will venture over to the (forgive me) DU. Wait, no, the site, will be down most likely :whistling:
sheriff733
10-29-2012, 16:55
So is Ohio. I am optimistic.
Whooo boy, when Romney is elected on the 6th, I will venture over to the (forgive me) DU. Wait, no, the site, will be down most likely :whistling:
Me too.
I. Cannot. Wait.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
sheriff733
10-29-2012, 16:56
Did you know Michigan is now a toss-up state? Keep hope alive!
I know! That's nuts. I couldn't believe it when I saw that.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
Romney will win in a landslide. I base that on the fact that I believe the American People are not Stupid.
Hailstorm
10-29-2012, 17:27
I live near Detroit. Not holding out for people wising up. Even here tho, the Oboma signs are not all over. We have one guy in the area with a Oboma sign, it has the UAW on it. Plus a few more signs. What this means to me is. I write all those other names down and make sure I don't vote for them if this guy like the Big O. His other choices will suck as well.:tongueout:
Nalapombu
10-30-2012, 10:52
Hey all,
It's great to see my thread still going. I thought it would've died out long ago. I've been without a laptop for a couple weeks and it's been tedious as all get out to try to use my 7 inch Kindle Fire to browse GT. If I don't get my laptop fixed soon I am going to have to use TapaTalk or something to make it better.
Well I have to say that I too am feeling more and more optimistic. For the first time I have felt like Romney could actually pull this thing off. Ohio is looking better for us for sure. I also like what I am seeing about place that were once thought completely Soetero territory, lock, stock and barrel. NO CHANCE for Romney. I am talking about Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, and maybe a couple more. He probably won't win any of these BLUE states, but I am NOT giving up on them and am still praying for the people there that they will make the best choice for the country and their fellow man by electing Romney. This country is on a fast road to GREECE if something isn't done. For the first time in a long time I have thought that the choice we have is very critical to the very survival of the Republic that we know as the USA. I really believe that after another 4 years of Soetero will will have a country that isn't recognizable or be the place that our fathers and grandfathers fought, bled and died to preserve. That country is teetering on the edge of the abyss. It's going to take some serious people to get us turned around. We can't afford a "Community Organizer" running the largest and most complicated "corporation" this world has ever seen. You have seen what that gets you after only 4 years.
I could go on and on, but I am going to have to go back and start reading from the beginning to see what you all are saying. I know there are some good things buried back in the previous pages and I gotta see what they are.
One last thing, my mom's husband has believed and said for several weeks now that Romney will win in a landslide. I don't know if he is talking about Reagan-Mondale kinda landslide or Soetero-Mccain "landslide." When he started saying it I thought he was a NUT, but now I'm not sure what I think. At this point I'd take an Electoral College victory of 270-268. I have to admit though, I sure would love to see a Reagan type of BLOWOUT happen a week from today. Can you imagine how entertaining it would be to watch NBC and PMSNBC if something like that happened? It would be great TV for sure. Wonder what kind of feeling Chris Matthews would be having up his leg if that happened?
They could have Colin Powell, Michael Moore, Babs Striesand, Howard Dean and several others that have the same mental illness all in one big room talking about how it was all a HUGE RACIST CAMPAIGN that got it done and we were back to the Jim Crow days now.
Sadly, if Romey only won by 1 vote there are lots of NUTBAGS like those I mentioned that will absolutely be calling the USA a RACIST nation if Soetero loses. It is so easy to predict that kinda trash taking place that it should be funny, but it isn't.
Nalajr
Projected Electoral at the moment shows O 247, to R's 206. God I hope he don't get another four years...
Henry's Dad
10-30-2012, 11:30
BHO is making a big ad buy in PA this week.
Ask yourself why he is doing this now.
PA was supposed to be "in the bag" for him.
PA is now very likely to go for Romney.
Without PA, BHO has no path to victory. The electoral college numbers just won't add up for him.
If he loses PA, he can forget about Ohio. It's all over.
You heard it here first...
The Obama ads running in northern VA have been SO negative. I think people are really getting tired of it. Just like BHO said in 2008, when you've got nothing, attack the other guy.
Frankly I'll still be surprised if Romney wins but the fact that he now has a shot speaks volumes. If the Dems screw this up it will only barely outshine the Republicans utter deafness on stupid social issues.
-Stooxie
G29Reload
10-30-2012, 12:12
The Obama ads running in northern VA have been SO negative.
They've been loaded with lies too.
The crap about saving detroit/auto industry.
Really? Selling $80,000 Volts for less then $25,000 is sustainable?
Buying GM in the 50s when its now in the 20's, losing 60% of our investment was a good idea?
People now refusing to buy it cause its "Government Motors" and preferring Ford instead cause they didn't take government money?
And the economy moving again? My ass. 1.3% growth net of government spending doesn't even keep up with population growth.
Steady stream of lies.
droidfire
10-30-2012, 12:25
BHO is making a big ad buy in PA this week.
Ask yourself why he is doing this now.
PA was supposed to be "in the bag" for him.
PA is now very likely to go for Romney.
Without PA, BHO has no path to victory. The electoral college numbers just won't add up for him.
If he loses PA, he can forget about Ohio. It's all over.
You heard it here first...
We'll do what we can but if it's anything like last time, in the city of philadelphia anyways, the people signing you in to vote give you a hard time if you say republican. I know a handful of people who won't even go to the poll because of how uncomfortable they are made to feel saying republican.
PAGunner
10-30-2012, 12:37
Reading all the nervous Nancy posts on here cracks me up, I've been confident Romney will win, I'm still confident, I've not wavered one bit, polls have been and are still skewed. 4-8% win is my prediction with 8% being more likely than 4%. Not a Ragan V mondull landslide but it will be an arse kicking next week. I'm looking forward to watching PMSNBC election night, looking forward to president elect Romney first speak and I'm looking forward to the lame duck president accepting defeat!
sheriff733
10-30-2012, 12:39
Romney will win 52%-48% of the popular vote and will break 300 in electoral votes. My prediction.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
Reading all the nervous Nancy posts on here cracks me up, I've been confident Romney will win, I'm still confident, I've not wavered one bit, polls have been and are still skewed. 4-8% win is my prediction with 8% being more likely than 4%. Not a Ragan V mondull landslide but it will be an arse kicking next week. I'm looking forward to watching PMSNBC election night, looking forward to president elect Romney first speak and I'm looking forward to the lame duck president accepting defeat!
I'm with you, but who is "Ragan V mondull"?
PAGunner
10-31-2012, 06:29
I'm with you, but who is "Ragan V mondull"?
Reagan*. iPhone spellchecker mistake, Mondull wasn't a mistake as the man was dull. Look into the 1984 landslide, that map is as red as you will ever see a map!
Reagan*. iPhone spellchecker mistake, Mondull wasn't a mistake as the man was dull. Look into the 1984 landslide, that map is as red as you will ever see a map!
I kinda figured that. I just wanted to break your stones a little.
jason10mm
10-31-2012, 11:03
I wonder if Romney wins if he will dig out that "Office of the President Elect" seal Obama had made up and start running the country 2 months early :P
Romney will win 52%-48% of the popular vote and will break 300 in electoral votes. My prediction.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
This. :wavey:
Trew2Life
10-31-2012, 15:51
No way Romney wins. I'd stake my GT membership on that. Ohio is the decider. Mitt might even get upset in FL too.
I'm going to really love Mitt Romney's concession speech.
Goaltender66
10-31-2012, 17:23
No way Romney wins. I'd stake my GT membership on that. Ohio is the decider. Mitt might even get upset in FL too.
I'm going to really love Mitt Romney's concession speech.
Quoted and logged, not that many of us believed that you'd be here much past the election anyway. ;)
Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine
G29Reload
10-31-2012, 17:25
No way Romney wins. I'd stake my GT membership on that.
Pleez if theres' a God in heaven...:whistling:
No way Romney wins. I'd stake my GT membership on that. Ohio is the decider. Mitt might even get upset in FL too.
I'm going to really love Mitt Romney's concession speech.
I don't believe he will either...and it will be entirely the fault of the GOP for putting up such a **** candidate, not because Obama is any good.
FireForged
10-31-2012, 17:34
If you go by the model that dems have gone by for years, Romney winning early votes in huge numbers is a good indication that many people have turned. The fact that this race is within the margin of error tells me that anyone can win. If you factor in that undecides this late normally vote for the challenger.. leans in Romneys favor but I still think its a toss up.
sheriff733
10-31-2012, 17:40
I don't believe he will either...and it will be entirely the fault of the GOP for putting up such a **** candidate, not because Obama is any good.
Just stop.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
Providence
10-31-2012, 17:45
No way Romney wins. I'd stake my GT membership on that. Ohio is the decider. Mitt might even get upset in FL too.
I'm going to really love Mitt Romney's concession speech.
Awesome! But you can stop by some to talk about your guns.
Little Joe
10-31-2012, 17:48
I hope he wins. I would hate to see what our country will look like after 4 more years of the socialist Obama.
If there is any way the forces of evil can steal it for Obama, they will.
camelotkid
10-31-2012, 18:05
Intrade 61.8% Obama 31.8% Romney
Put your money where your mouth is.
camelotkid
10-31-2012, 18:13
Intrade 61.8% Obama 31.8% Romney
Put your money where your mouth is.
now at 68% to 32%
Trew2Life
10-31-2012, 18:15
Awesome! But you can stop by some to talk about your guns.
You guys talk about guns around here ??? :tease:
Just stop.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
Did you want Romney to be the GOP pick? Answer honestly, because I need a laugh.
bigred0383
10-31-2012, 20:29
I think if it remains close, Romney will win. There is a silent majority when it comes to politics. Being conservative isn't "cool." Just look at the mainstream media: NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN all lean left. Fox only leans right. The silent majority showed up to reelect Scott Walker in WI by an even greater margin than the first election. I think it will happen in the presidential election too.
Nalapombu
10-31-2012, 23:50
My Lord that rant from Trew about his daughters precious abortion "rights" made me throw up a bit. After reading your rant I wondered if you even understand how laws are made in this country because it doesn't appear you do.
I would think that you'd be more worried whether your daughters will grow up in a 3rd world cesspool that is buried in a mountain of Socialist debt. Maybe they'll get a look at what a Misery Index is. Then when they come to you and ask what you did when there was still something that could've been done to fix it you can explain to them how you were more concerned about the sanctity of their uterus.
Great to see the FemiNazis have infiltrated GT. You live long enough I guess you'll see anything!
Just make us all a promise that you'll uphold your end if Romney wins.
Nalajr
RC-RAMIE
11-01-2012, 08:25
I would think that you'd be more worried whether your daughters will grow up in a 3rd world cesspool that is buried in a mountain of Socialist debt.
My question is do you not care about the Socialist debt that Romney supports?
PAGunner
11-01-2012, 08:31
Did you want Romney to be the GOP pick? Answer honestly, because I need a laugh.
News flash, no other GOP candidate would have taken it to Obama the way Romney did. The man is a conservative, true conservative, but he's proven to be pragmatic as well when he needs to be. That is the recipe for a great president, but perhaps you didn't think Reagan was a great president, some people there is no pleasing I guess.
camelotkid
11-01-2012, 08:44
News flash, no other GOP candidate would have taken it to Obama the way Romney did. The man is a conservative, true conservative, but he's proven to be pragmatic as well when he needs to be. That is the recipe for a great president, but perhaps you didn't think Reagan was a great president, some people there is no pleasing I guess.
true conservative? :rofl:the man changes positions on issues more often than he changes his holy underwear. You are grasping at straws trying to find any way you can to justify supporting Romney. Comparing him to Reagan just makes you look desperate, comparing him to Nixon would be more appropriate.
frank4570
11-01-2012, 08:48
News flash, no other GOP candidate would have taken it to Obama the way Romney did. The man is a conservative, true conservative, but he's proven to be pragmatic as well when he needs to be. That is the recipe for a great president, but perhaps you didn't think Reagan was a great president, some people there is no pleasing I guess.
WOW! :shocked: :rofl::rofl:
PAGunner
11-01-2012, 08:50
true conservative? :rofl:the man changes positions on issues more often than he changes his holy underwear. You are grasping at straws trying to find any way you can to justify supporting Romney. Comparing him to Reagan just makes you look desperate, comparing him to Nixon would be more appropriate.
If you actually listened to what he said it would become obvious he's conservative. Why don't you give an example of sometjinf he's changed his position on, since this is your knock on him.
And FYI, Ronald Reagan was a democrat at one time and the governor of Kommiefornia. Perhaps you need to wake up and open your eyes.
camelotkid
11-01-2012, 08:56
If you actually listened to what he said it would become obvious he's conservative. Why don't you give an example of sometjinf he's changed his position on, since this is your knock on him.
And FYI, Ronald Reagan was a democrat at one time and the governor of Kommiefornia. Perhaps you need to wake up and open your eyes.
Abortion, hunting, Reagan, don't ask don't tell, vietnam, gun control, health care reform, climate change, bush tax cuts, tax pledges, flip-flopping
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/mitt-romneys-biggest-flip-flops-20120801
If the man actually had a back bone and made his real opinions clear I might respect him, probably still wouldn't support him but atleast I would respect him. As of now he has neither.
PAGunner
11-01-2012, 09:01
Abortion, hunting, Reagan, don't ask don't tell, vietnam, gun control, health care reform, climate change, bush tax cuts, tax pledges, flip-flopping
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/mitt-romneys-biggest-flip-flops-20120801
If the man actually had a back bone and made his real opinions clear I might respect him, probably still wouldn't support him but atleast I would respect him. As of now he has neither.
Wow, the rolling stones... Great source, not bias at all. Lmao
Cite a legit source, then we can discuss. Takin someone out of context is lame, anyone could do that and paint anyone the way they'd like.
camelotkid
11-01-2012, 09:05
Wow, the rolling stones... Great source, not bias at all. Lmao
Cite a legit source, then we can discuss. Takin someone out of context is lame, anyone could do that and paint anyone the way they'd like.
It doesn't matter what the source is if the facts are there
http://youtu.be/EQwrB1vu74c
Here Comes The Landslide For Romney
In addition in the Senate - Eight GOP takeaways and two giveaways for a net gain of six. A 53-47 Senate, just like we have now, only opposite.
Barack Obama’s parting gift to the Democratic Party.
Full analysis at:
http://www.dickmorris.com/here-comes-the-landslide/
Romney wins in a landslide easily.
Providence
11-01-2012, 13:40
This: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204846304578090820229096046.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_opinion
If you read to the end, you'll see the key is turnout. We need to vote to make the change. We early voted yesterday and ,y wife actually danced in the street outside our polling place! We can end this nightmare!
Fear Night
11-01-2012, 14:04
Yes, I really do think Romney will win.
Obama won in 2008 due to his promised "Hope and Change". People from all over turned out to make that a reality, and make history for electing the first black President. In 2008, it was the "cool" thing to vote for Obama.
Fast forward to 2012, where voting for Obama isn't quite as cool, and where we are still waiting for the promised hope and change. The turnout is guaranteed to not be as large, since it's not a huge, history making event this time around.
Trew2Life
11-01-2012, 15:05
News flash, no other GOP candidate would have taken it to Obama the way Romney did. The man is a conservative, true conservative, but he's proven to be pragmatic as well when he needs to be. That is the recipe for a great president, but perhaps you didn't think Reagan was a great president, some people there is no pleasing I guess.
Substitute 'conservative' for 'flip-flopper' and 'pragmatic' for 'a liar'. It reads better this way.
What I love with liberals is that when a conservative changes an opinion it's 'flip-flopping' but when a Democrat like Obama does it he 'evolves.'
sheriff733
11-01-2012, 15:54
What I love with liberals is that when a conservative changes an opinion it's 'flip-flopping' but when a Democrat like Obama does it he 'evolves.'
:rofl:
So true.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
costanza187
11-01-2012, 16:16
What I love with liberals is that when a conservative changes an opinion it's 'flip-flopping' but when a Democrat like Obama does it he 'evolves.'
:rofl: that's great!
and true
IndianaMatt
11-01-2012, 16:43
It doesn't matter what the source is if the facts are there
http://youtu.be/EQwrB1vu74c
Jeesus Christ what a slimeball. I only watched the first three minutes, but that's enough to make you vomit. I don't know what's dumber: Mittens or the people that buy his yard sale of lies. Stupid middle class will vote themselves right into the poorhouse with this guy.
Seriously. How could you vote for this clown? Seriously. I wouldn't trust him to take my dogs out around the block to ****.
PAGunner
11-01-2012, 17:33
I don't know what's dumber: Mittens or the people that buy his yard sale of lies. Stupid middle class will vote themselves right into the poorhouse
This has my vote for the dumbest words I've ever read on GlockTalk. 6 trillion in 4 years? Wait till you see the second term! You can tax all the "rich" people you want 99% federal income tax, if you actually were simple enough to think it would increase tax revenue and not cause our economy to come to a skreetching halt, it would still not cover our new MASSIVE deficits... So I'll give you a free economics 101 lesson, if we do not have the tax revenue to pay back our debt our guberment will have to print more money... Which means every dollar you have will have massively decreased buying power, which is an invisible pay decrease, same effect as a tax on everyone, this will cause a big decrease in standard of living... And who will be hit the hardest, the middle class or the "rich"?
Fact is, freedom, both economic and personal is what is best for everyone, upper, middle and lower class. The man that represents this is Romney, NOT Obama. Obama's vision will create a 2 class America, the elites and an under class. The only people who should actually be supporting Obama are those that are in the lower class AND lack the ambition to climb out and would rather have a guberment hand out.
Trew2Life
11-01-2012, 19:20
Fact is, freedom, both economic and personal is what is best for everyone, upper, middle and lower class. The man that represents this is Romney, NOT.
Did a little editing and fixed it up for you. Romney's vision is to farm our workforce out to the highest bidder. That's his big 12 million job creation plan; to do away with minimum wage and unions and create a environment conducive to low paying, transient jobs. The Bain Capital way. Yeah. Staples is a great store, but is that what your career plans are? Retire as a head cashier at Staples.
American interest overseas will be tested as will Romney's (in)ability to draw allied support. 'Personhood' goes off the chart and we will still have an AWB.
KommieforniaGlocker
11-03-2012, 09:02
Wow, the rolling stones... Great source, not bias at all. Lmao
Cite a legit source, then we can discuss. Takin someone out of context is lame, anyone could do that and paint anyone the way they'd like.
Look at his tenure of Governor of MA, you can see for yourself, use Google. The GOP brought this upon themselves, nominating this tool. Only reason why I am voting for this idiot is because another four more years for Brother Hussein is No Bueno.
G29Reload
11-03-2012, 09:22
Jeesus Christ what a slimeball. I only watched the first three minutes, but that's enough to make you vomit. I don't know what's dumber: Mittens or the people that buy his yard sale of lies. Stupid middle class will vote themselves right into the poorhouse with this guy.
There's no room left in the poorhouse, its packed with Obama voters who's primary concern is running up other people's credit cards. 17 trillion at last count.
G29Reload
11-03-2012, 09:25
That's his big 12 million job creation plan; to do away with minimum wage
Lie.
and unions
Lie.
create a environment conducive to low paying, transient jobs.
Lie. Lowpaying transient jobs, the few there are, are what Obama gave us and what we're trying to get away from.
'Personhood' goes off the chart
Lie.
and we will still have an AWB.
Except we don't have one now and we're not getting one if Romney is elected.
Did a little editing and fixed it up for you. Romney's vision is to farm our workforce out to the highest bidder. That's his big 12 million job creation plan; to do away with minimum wage and unions and create a environment conducive to low paying, transient jobs. The Bain Capital way. Yeah. Staples is a great store, but is that what your career plans are? Retire as a head cashier at Staples.
American interest overseas will be tested as will Romney's (in)ability to draw allied support. 'Personhood' goes off the chart and we will still have an AWB.
Unions are a cancer on America. They ensure that products will be overpriced and that incompetent an lazy employees will stay employed.
Trew2Life
11-03-2012, 09:51
Only reason why I am voting for this idiot is because another four more years for Brother Hussein is No Bueno.
Unions are a cancer on America. They ensure that products will be overpriced and that incompetent an lazy employees will stay employed.
More to the latter than the former ... That is why Romney/Ryan will not and can not win. Poor attitudes towards middle class people. I am not in a union but I recognize and appreciate their importance. Teachers unions, law enforcement unions, manufacturers ... and most other decent Americans recognize them too.
Management certainly has their union. They're call 'shareholders'.
Trew2Life
11-03-2012, 09:55
In any wild fantasy that Romney wins the remaining Democrats are going to want to negotiate gun control. The left will use AWB either as a tool of obstruction or as a bargaining chip to pass some other republican legislation. Can you say 'riders'? Romney's done it before. He'll do it again.
More to the latter than the former ... That is why Romney/Ryan will not and can not win. Poor attitudes towards middle class people. I am not in a union but I recognize and appreciate their importance. Teachers unions, law enforcement unions, manufacturers ... and most other decent Americans recognize them too.
Management certainly has their union. They're call 'shareholders'.
Unions had their place in America a century ago. Today they are many things, but decent isn't one of them. They are vampires that kill business and industry, cripple progress, and serve as little more than thugs and cheerleaders for Democrats.
In any wild fantasy that Romney wins the remaining Democrats are going to want to negotiate gun control. The left will use AWB either as a tool of obstruction or as a bargaining chip to pass some other republican legislation. Can you say 'riders'? Romney's done it before. He'll do it again.
You really think they're that stupid? Last time it cost them control of Congress. Maybe they just don't remember how much gun control really stings at election time?
G36's Rule
11-03-2012, 10:21
Lie.
Lie.
Lie. Lowpaying transient jobs, the few there are, are what Obama gave us and what we're trying to get away from.
Lie.
Except we don't have one now and we're not getting one if Romney is elected.
You guys understand you are arguing with a DU troll? He will go away after the election so just ignore the troll for now.
G29Reload
11-03-2012, 10:24
You guys understand you are arguing with a DU troll? He will go away after the election so just ignore the troll for now.
I get that, but he needs to be refuted for the record lest the gullible be swayed. He's basically electioneering. HAving no scruples, if just one lie works on just one person entering a polling booth…
Get it? Smack em down with truth and facts at every opportunity you see them here vandalizing.
sheriff733
11-03-2012, 10:28
I get that, but he needs to be refuted for the record lest the gullible be swayed. He's basically electioneering. HAving no scruples, if just one lie works on just one person entering a polling booth…
Get it? Smack em down with truth and facts at every opportunity you see them here vandalizing.
I like your style.
CincyRed
11-03-2012, 11:07
I get that, but he needs to be refuted for the record lest the gullible be swayed. He's basically electioneering. HAving no scruples, if just one lie works on just one person entering a polling booth…
Get it? Smack em down with truth and facts at every opportunity you see them here vandalizing.
^^^^^
Love your argument!!
SpoiledBySig
11-03-2012, 12:11
You guys understand you are arguing with a DU troll? He will go away after the election so just ignore the troll for now.
That's what I like about most here in the GD forum. I knew from day one he was nothing but a DU Troll and he would fade away after November 6th. I was just wondering if others felt the same way (and they do). :cool:
frank4570
11-03-2012, 12:31
That's what I like about most here in the GD forum. I knew from day one he was nothing but a DU Troll and he would fade away after November 6th. I was just wondering if others felt the same way (and they do). :cool:
I doubt DU even knows GT exists. Or were you just talking in general terms?
Trew2Life
11-03-2012, 12:41
Yep. You got to love them trolls. Them guys that come in here and call themselves 'representing' and going all strong for their candidate; ignoring the obvious truths and the facts; belittling the dissenting minority opinion. Everybody knows only republicans love guns and shooting. Hopefully, they will be gone after the election. I know I'll be here.
:devildance:
series1811
11-03-2012, 12:44
Yep. You got to love them trolls. Them guys that come in here and call themselves 'representing' and going all strong for their candidate; ignoring the obvious truths and the facts; belittling the dissenting minority opinion. Everybody knows only republicans love guns and shooting. Hopefully, they will be gone after the election. I know I'll be here.
:devildance:
Trew2Life
Join Date: Sep 2012
No lurking what so ever. Just joined up and started telling us how we had Obama all wrong. We know what that means.
SpoiledBySig
11-03-2012, 12:46
Trew2Life
Join Date: Sep 2012
No lurking what so ever. Just joined up and started telling us how we had Obama all wrong. We know what that means.
My sentiments exactly!
Trew2Life
11-03-2012, 12:51
Trew2Life
Join Date: Sep 2012
No lurking what so ever. Just joined up and started telling us how we had Obama all wrong. We know what that means.
My sentiments exactly!
Tell me what does that mean? Tell me how everyone in the forum is supposed to have the same opinion and behave and function like a Borg cube.
series1811
11-03-2012, 12:56
Tell me what does that mean? Tell me how everyone in the forum is supposed to have the same opinion and behave and function like a Borg cube.
It means you didn't hear about Glocktalk, think it would be interesting because you own and like to shoot Glocks, then after a few months of reading and posting about shooting and owning Glocks, found the political issues forum, and read for a while, and then started posting, like the rest of us did.
We know what that means.
Tell me what does that mean? Tell me how everyone in the forum is supposed to have the same opinion and behave and function like a Borg cube.
So it's just a coincidence that you joined in the 2 months prior to an election and you're a cheerleader for Obama? If it walks like a troll, and talks like a troll, we can be confident that it isn't a duck.
G29Reload
11-03-2012, 13:09
Everybody knows only republicans love guns and shooting.
If that's all you ever posted about, no one would ever have noticed you. You'd just be a face in the crowd.
Nice try. You've been had. You are so thoroughly discredited its a wonder you even bother. Your agenda is clear.
You're a troll.
You're shilling for your candidate.
Some of your arguments, or what passes for them are word for word talking points. Whether DU, or Daily Kos or just an admirer thereof, the light of day shines on cockroaches like you. Now scram before the flying sneaker of death catches you before making it back under the stove.
I get that, but he needs to be refuted for the record lest the gullible be swayed. He's basically electioneering. HAving no scruples, if just one lie works on just one person entering a polling booth…
Get it? Smack em down with truth and facts at every opportunity you see them here vandalizing.
Somebody buy him a beer. Hell, whenever you are in Phoenix, drinks are on me :supergrin:
Trew2Life
11-03-2012, 13:30
Not that I have to prove anything to anyone ... but it does have a sense of self-satisfaction to silence ones critics. Unless of course you're going to say that I only purchased the gun as a back story.
I especially love the ones so dense they don't understand sarcasm.
I purchased a Glock. While looking around for Glock prices, reviews and accessories I found links to GlockTalk (kudos to GT marketing). Much to my surprise I found political and religious issues here too. So don't hate the player. Hate the game.
All this talk of 'trolls' by others is simply self-projection bias.
http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=228823&stc=1&d=1351970149
Here Comes The Landslide For Romney
In addition in the Senate - Eight GOP takeaways and two giveaways for a net gain of six. A 53-47 Senate, just like we have now, only opposite.
Barack Obama’s parting gift to the Democratic Party.
Full analysis at:
http://www.dickmorris.com/here-comes-the-landslide/
Tagged
Providence
11-03-2012, 15:10
FWIW: http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/11/former-hillary-aide-backs-romney-148251.html
Quote: "For most of my life, I've been an active Democrat. I am proud to have worked for President Bill Clinton and then-Senator Hillary Clinton, and, during that time, I saw firsthand what can be accomplished by strong, bipartisan leadership. I know what it means to work across the aisle on issues that are important to the American people. And that's why I am supporting Mitt Romney. Governor Romney has a plan to restore the prosperity this country deserves and expects. He will work with people of good will no matter what their party, and he will pursue the policies that are in the best interest of our country, no matter who proposes them. That's what President Obama promised to do four years ago. But like so many of his promises, bipartisan cooperation is just another one he has broken. We can't have four more years of failed policies and two parties that can't work together. We need the change Mitt Romney is offering."
Trew2Life
11-03-2012, 16:13
Remember ... it was the republicans who started the 'make Obama a one term president' stragedy and the rest of the right lined right up behind it. The democrats could/would employ the same tactic or worst, push gun control riders onto republican sponsored bills.
SHTF scenario is the republicans win control of the senate and Obama gets re-elected.
Magnus2131
11-03-2012, 16:16
I doubt DU even knows GT exists. Or were you just talking in general terms?
Oh yes they do. Go look, they have made references to GT.
Magnus2131
11-03-2012, 16:17
Remember ... it was the republicans who started the 'make Obama a one term president' stragedy and the rest of the right lined right up behind it. The democrats could/would employ the same tactic or worst, push gun control riders onto republican sponsored bills.
SHTF scenario is the republicans win control of the senate and Obama gets re-elected.
Troll.:wavey:
frank4570
11-03-2012, 16:43
Oh yes they do. Go look, they have made references to GT.
Extremely few and short lived references. I was surprised to find anything, but I can't see where even two people exchanged comments about this site.
If you search freerepublic you will find probably tens of thousands of references on DU compared to our 4.
Jade Falcon
11-03-2012, 17:49
The people that believe Romney will win, are the same people who believe rainbow-colored cars making left-hand-turns is entertaining.
Nalapombu
11-03-2012, 22:43
OOH good one Jade....
How long did you contemplate on that before posting? I'm betting somewhere north of 90 minutes or so.
You and Drew could use a 40 ounce can of frothy SOLOMON JUICE before you log on.
Nalajr
Providence
11-04-2012, 03:33
The people that believe Romney will win, are the same people who believe rainbow-colored cars making left-hand-turns is entertaining.
I plan to wear my Dale Jr. T-shirt when I got vote for Romney! Wait... I don't own a Dale Jr. T-shirt... And I've already early voted. Maybe I'll watch the race today, just to celebrate the approaching Romney win!
series1811
11-04-2012, 05:59
Not that I have to prove anything to anyone ... but it does have a sense of self-satisfaction to silence ones critics. Unless of course you're going to say that I only purchased the gun as a back story.
I especially love the ones so dense they don't understand sarcasm.
I purchased a Glock. While looking around for Glock prices, reviews and accessories I found links to GlockTalk (kudos to GT marketing). Much to my surprise I found political and religious issues here too. So don't hate the player. Hate the game.
All this talk of 'trolls' by others is simply self-projection bias.
http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=228823&stc=1&d=1351970149
Well, this makes you even harder to understand, and for your views to make sense.
I can understand a person who doesn't care about guns pushing a Democratic agenda. I just don't get a gun owner doing it.
The Demos know it is a losing issue for them right now. If Obama gets in again, as a lame duck, Putin won't be the only one waiting for his flexibility to kick in.
SpoiledBySig
11-04-2012, 06:04
If Romney has no chance winning...then why has Obama been campaigning desperately like a madman these past few months?
Michael Rye
11-04-2012, 06:13
I don't know if Romney will win or not, but he has my vote on Tuesday.
For me, it's very simple. Of the two candidates, who would Iran rather see win? Obama.
Of the two candidates, who would the Chinese rather see win? Obama.
Of the two candidates, who would Putin rather see win? Obama.
We have enemies and Obama projects weakness and incompetence.
Trew2Life
11-04-2012, 06:22
Well, this makes you even harder to understand, and for your views to make sense.
I can understand a person who doesn't care about guns pushing a Democratic agenda. I just don't get a gun owner doing it.
The Demos know it is a losing issue for them right now. If Obama gets in again, as a lame duck, Putin won't be the only one waiting for his flexibility to kick in.
I don't vote with my guns and I don't shoot with my politicians (Thank you, Dick Cheney).
I'll be the first one to tell you that many of the democratics platform on gun issues is just plain wrong, but I don't believe they want to ban all gun ownership and/or take away our guns. I do empathize with a society trying desperately to deal with gun related chaos. More important to me than whether or not I can own a high capacity magazine is whether or not hungry children eat, the elderly are provided for and our veterans are honored.
Other than a love of the 2nd Amendment, the GOP just doesn't appeal to my core values.
series1811
11-04-2012, 06:33
I don't vote with my guns and I don't shoot with my politicians (Thank you, Dick Cheney).
I'll be the first one to tell you that many of the democratics platform on gun issues is just plain wrong, but I don't believe they want to ban all gun ownership and/or take away our guns. I do empathize with a society trying desperately to deal with gun related chaos. More important to me than whether or not I can own a high capacity magazine is whether or not hungry children eat, the elderly are provided for and our veterans are honored.
Other than a love of the 2nd Amendment, the GOP just doesn't appeal to my core values.
Well, I happen to believe that in the end, the Second Amendment is the one that keeps the rest of the amendments for us. And, I would vote Republican for no other reason.
Michael Rye
11-04-2012, 06:58
I don't vote with my guns and I don't shoot with my politicians (Thank you, Dick Cheney).
I'll be the first one to tell you that many of the democratics platform on gun issues is just plain wrong, but I don't believe they want to ban all gun ownership and/or take away our guns. I do empathize with a society trying desperately to deal with gun related chaos. More important to me than whether or not I can own a high capacity magazine is whether or not hungry children eat, the elderly are provided for and our veterans are honored.
Other than a love of the 2nd Amendment, the GOP just doesn't appeal to my core values.Your ability to own a high capacity magazine may just be the very single factor which keeps you alive one day. If you're dead, then you can't very well feed children, provide for the elderly, or honor veterans...now can you?
Trew2Life
11-04-2012, 07:23
Your ability to own a high capacity magazine may just be the very single factor which keeps you alive one day. If you're dead, then you can't very well feed children, provide for the elderly, or honor veterans...now can you?
I'm not a soldier, but I used to be. I'm a civilian now. I have every confidence in my tactical and practical abilities. One well placed round out the muzzle is better than all the rounds you can fit in a magazine.
If the 'one day' you're referring to is the Zombie Apocalypse, SHTF day .. I'm ready for that too and in those times the laws and bans won't really matter ... will they?
Providence
11-04-2012, 07:25
Michigan, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania are all tied and trending Romney.
Little Joe
11-04-2012, 07:27
I don't know if Romney will win or not, but he has my vote on Tuesday.
For me, it's very simple. Of the two candidates, who would Iran rather see win? Obama.
Of the two candidates, who would the Chinese rather see win? Obama.
Of the two candidates, who would Putin rather see win? Obama.
We have enemies and Obama projects weakness and incompetence.
Damn good points.
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 07:29
Michigan, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania are all tied and trending Romney.
keep dreaming
Little Joe
11-04-2012, 07:31
I don't know if Romney will win or not, but he has my vote on Tuesday.
For me, it's very simple. Of the two candidates, who would Iran rather see win? Obama.
Of the two candidates, who would the Chinese rather see win? Obama.
Of the two candidates, who would Putin rather see win? Obama.
We have enemies and Obama projects weakness and incompetence.
Let's add Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, and Al "Not So" Sharpton to that, as well.
Michael Rye
11-04-2012, 07:38
I'm not a soldier, but I used to be. I'm a civilian now. I have every confidence in my tactical and practical abilities. One well placed round out the muzzle is better than all the rounds you can fit in a magazine.
If the 'one day' you're referring to is the Zombie Apocalypse, SHTF day .. I'm ready for that too and in those times the laws and bans won't really matter ... will they?
Well buddy...as a former soldier with full confidence in your tactical and practical abilities, you of all people should know better than anyone that you just can't always count on one well placed round being the end of the fight.
skyboss_4evr
11-04-2012, 07:49
Romney will win by a large margin... mark my words.
jdavionic
11-04-2012, 07:52
Romney will win by a large margin... mark my words.
Your state is a toss up. What are you seeing on the ground there?
Trew2Life
11-04-2012, 08:09
I like the numbers published by 538: Nate Silver's Politcal Calculus (http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/)
Obama is a 4:5 favorite for re-election (83.7%) and a Democratic controlled Senate is projected as 91.5% probability.
Then prepare ta use your skills ta survive.'08.
skyboss_4evr
11-04-2012, 08:25
Your state is a toss up. What are you seeing on the ground there?
The Des Moines Register endorsed Romney. First time in over forty years that liberal rag has endorsed a Republican.
Other factors included, Iowa will go Romney.
skyboss_4evr
11-04-2012, 08:26
keep dreaming
That's no dream.
CBennett
11-04-2012, 09:16
well i will be voting Romney i hope he wins. If he does not win the usa deserves what it gets from obamas fail.
G29Reload
11-04-2012, 09:19
If Romney has no chance winning...then why has Obama been campaigning desperately like a madman these past few months?
Barone and Morris are predicting blowout landslides for Romney.
Rove and Rollins are predicting closer but solid wins.
NO ONE is predicting a landslide for Obama.
NO ONE is predicting a solid win for Obama, not since the first debate.
A lot of folks are predicting a close election, the best possibility of a win for Zero.
So its there and worse for him.
Enthusiasm like 08? Nope…gone.
Most of his administration near 10% unemployment, and has never been better than when he took office. NEVER.
Only recently has he gotten close and that was by cooking the books, undercounting those discouraged and dropped out of th work force.
Coal mines being shut down.
An Obama tax of $2000 a year avg per family in higher gas prices. Routinely double that which he inherited. DOUBLE!
Getting rid of this clown is a no-brainer. I'm amazed ANYONE is voting for Zero, except we seem to have a monopoly on stupid in this country.
Or just a craven media. If Romney loses, it will be because of them. I no longer watch the mainstream media, but I understand any real info onBenghazi is being withheld. The unemployment situation is only presented as rosy and only the administrations lies are parrotted. If I only listened to NBC I'd probably vote for Obama too.
No, No I wouldn't. Can't be that stupid.:rofl:
keep dreaming
What internal tracking do you see daily?
That's no dream.
Especially when you toss Wisconsin into the mix.
The fact we are even discussing the POSSIBILITY of a blue state flip this late means the O campaign is in serious trouble.
Not one state...or two...but FOUR of FIVE!
ClydeG19
11-04-2012, 10:12
Some of these states that some polls are showing as in play are really not. There is no way a heavily union state like Michigan is going R. Pennsylvania isn't in play either. The population centers of the state will vote D and carry the rest of the state kicking and screaming with them.
It will all come down to Ohio. I'd get comfortable with the likelihood of having 4 more years of Pres Obama.
Barone and Morris are predicting blowout landslides for Romney.
Rove and Rollins are predicting closer but solid wins.
NO ONE is predicting a landslide for Obama.
NO ONE is predicting a solid win for Obama, not since the first debate.
A lot of folks are predicting a close election, the best possibility of a win for Zero.
So its there and worse for him.
Enthusiasm like 08? Nope…gone.
Most of his administration near 10% unemployment, and has never been better than when he took office. NEVER.
Only recently has he gotten close and that was by cooking the books, undercounting those discouraged and dropped out of th work force.
Coal mines being shut down.
An Obama tax of $2000 a year avg per family in higher gas prices. Routinely double that which he inherited. DOUBLE!
Getting rid of this clown is a no-brainer. I'm amazed ANYONE is voting for Zero, except we seem to have a monopoly on stupid in this country.
Or just a craven media. If Romney loses, it will be because of them. I no longer watch the mainstream media, but I understand any real info onBenghazi is being withheld. The unemployment situation is only presented as rosy and only the administrations lies are parrotted. If I only listened to NBC I'd probably vote for Obama too.
No, No I wouldn't. Can't be that stupid.:rofl:
To say nothing of all the D+8 polls out there using 2008 Dem turnout. Thats the only reason O has been even remotely competitive til now. BUT he's still <50% in Rasmussen/Gallup etc polls.
After 4 years any president that can't get above 50% is toast.
ClydeG19
11-04-2012, 11:05
An Obama tax of $2000 a year avg per family in higher gas prices. Routinely double that which he inherited. DOUBLE!
Cmon, the President has nothing to do with gas prices, regardless of who is in office. Supply and demand, the oil companies, OPEC, etc. They control oil prices. What would you want Obama to do, cut the fed gas tax? That would save us 18 cents per gallon.
Cmon, the President has nothing to do with gas prices, regardless of who is in office. Supply and demand, the oil companies, OPEC, etc. They control oil prices. What would you want Obama to do, cut the fed gas tax? That would save us 18 cents per gallon.
That simply is not true. Increasing refinery capacity would generate some downward pressure on gas prices over the long term. That is an executive function, all you have to do is issue the permits to allow it.
http://www.redstate.com/briansikma/2012/11/04/final-obama-campaign-e-mails-berate-blame-supporters/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Wonder what their internals are telling them if they are getting testy?
:tongueout:
Providence
11-04-2012, 12:31
George Will predicted a 321-217 Romney landslide on ABCs This Week.
ClydeG19
11-04-2012, 12:45
That simply is not true. Increasing refinery capacity would generate some downward pressure on gas prices over the long term. That is an executive function, all you have to do is issue the permits to allow it.
A company still has to want to increase capacity or build new refineries. I think the President can help make an environment in which gas prices can go down, but the oil co's still need to choose to increase capacity, import more, etc.
Little Joe
11-04-2012, 12:53
I hope it is a landslide repudiation of everything Obama and the Democrats stand for.
A company still has to want to increase capacity or build new refineries. I think the President can help make an environment in which gas prices can go down, but the oil co's still need to choose to increase capacity, import more, etc.
That isn't true. They can't choose to do it now, they are not allowed to. They would build more refineries in a second if they could, they would love to be at 125% of production vs the total us demand.
G29Reload
11-04-2012, 13:51
The fed gov controls drillling permits. And has been sitting on them.
What did Romney state about the canadian pipeline.'08.
Some of these states that some polls are showing as in play are really not. There is no way a heavily union state like Michigan is going R. Pennsylvania isn't in play either. The population centers of the state will vote D and carry the rest of the state kicking and screaming with them.
It will all come down to Ohio. I'd get comfortable with the likelihood of having 4 more years of Pres Obama.
Except that Michigan overwhelmingly voted for a Republican governor a couple years ago after 8 years of a democrat who ran the state into the ground. Michigan voted for Reagan in both 80 & 84 so it could happen again.
sheriff733
11-04-2012, 15:00
O and R tied in Pennsylvania at 47%.
NEVER thought I'd see that.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 15:31
O and R tied in Pennsylvania at 47%.
NEVER thought I'd see that.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
ORLY?
http://i739.photobucket.com/albums/xx36/camelotkid/2012-11-03-battlegrounds1131.png
Averageman
11-04-2012, 15:37
Well of course there is NO WAY the Huffington post would be a teensy weensy itty bit biased is there?
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 15:38
Well of course there is NO WAY the Huffington post would be a teensy weensy itty bit biased is there?
yea and sourcing one poll that says your man is up when ALL the others say otherwise is not biased at all either :whistling:
Providence
11-04-2012, 15:43
yea and sourcing one poll that says your man is up when ALL the others say otherwise is not biased at all either :whistling:
Didn't read the thread, did ya?
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 15:44
Didn't read the thread, did ya?
I was referring to you saying that PA is tied, which it is not:wavey:
sheriff733
11-04-2012, 16:17
http://nation.foxnews.com/pennsylvania-polls/2012/11/04/pennsylvania-tied-47-47-eve-romneys-arrival
:whistling:
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 16:23
http://nation.foxnews.com/pennsylvania-polls/2012/11/04/pennsylvania-tied-47-47-eve-romneys-arrival
:whistling:
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
that is one poll, the picture I posted was an average of many polls...:upeyes:
http://nation.foxnews.com/pennsylvania-polls/2012/11/04/pennsylvania-tied-47-47-eve-romneys-arrival
:whistling:
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/pa/pennsylvania_romney_vs_obama-1891.html
:whistling:
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 16:27
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/pa/pennsylvania_romney_vs_obama-1891.html
:whistling:
you done did pissed all up in his cheerios :rofl:
sheriff733
11-04-2012, 16:43
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/pa/pennsylvania_romney_vs_obama-1891.html
:whistling:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/02/Pennsylvania-s-Most-Accurate-Pollster-Points-to-Romney-Win
We can do this all day.
Bottom line, it's extremely close.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/11/02/Pennsylvania-s-Most-Accurate-Pollster-Points-to-Romney-Win
We can do this all day.
Bottom line, it's extremely close.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
Have some self-respect. :upeyes: You posted two stories pointing to the same poll.
It IS within a usual margin of error (if that is what you want to classify as "extremely close") .... I'll give you that.
G36's Rule
11-04-2012, 16:48
What did Romney state about the canadian pipeline.'08.
We will build it, all the way through.
G36's Rule
11-04-2012, 16:49
Have some self-respect. :upeyes: You posted two stories pointing to the same poll.
It IS within a usual margin of error (if that is what you want to classify as "extremely close") .... I'll give you that.
That is kind of funny coming from someone with multiple user names troll boy.
sheriff733
11-04-2012, 16:53
Have some self-respect. :upeyes: You posted two stories pointing to the same poll.
It IS within a usual margin of error (if that is what you want to classify as "extremely close") .... I'll give you that.
Easy now, little fella. You could have just ignored my post, but decided not to and attempted to make me look bad.
No need to get upset about it.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
well i will be voting Romney i hope he wins. If he does not win the usa deserves what it gets from obamas fail.
And I will lay blame on the Republicans.
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 17:11
Easy now, little fella. You could have just ignored my post, but decided not to and attempted to make me look bad.
No need to get upset about it.
Sent with Probably Cause and Irrisputable Proof.
you used the same poll from two different news outlets, he did not need any help in making you look bad good sir :rofl:
jdavionic
11-04-2012, 17:17
I think the polls are unreliable. We are seeing skewed polling. For example, one pollster sampled 9% more democrats following 2008 turnout...yet significantly less democrats are turning out now.
I think a more telling sign is the turnout in early voting. Democratic turnout is significantly lower than 2008. Republican turnout is significantly higher than 2008. Republicans are stronger in election-day voting than democrats.
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 17:20
the polls always seem to be unreliable unless they are providing the desired results...:rofl:
the polls always seem to be unreliable unless they are providing the desired results...:rofl:
What do you think the generic ballot in OH, PA, CO and IA should be?
jdavionic
11-04-2012, 17:24
the polls always seem to be unreliable unless they are providing the desired results...:rofl:
A laughing smiley??? Does that mean that you believe the sampling is consistent with the expected voter turnout? Does that mean that you're disputing the turnout facts? Or are you just stirring the pot?
I got a question ? Who really has that much faith that either man can change much of anything ?
camelotkid
11-04-2012, 17:33
I think a more telling sign is the turnout in early voting. Democratic turnout is significantly lower than 2008. Republican turnout is significantly higher than 2008.
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-seems-early-vote-lead-key-states-204705391--election.html
jdavionic
11-04-2012, 17:36
http://news.yahoo.com/obama-seems-early-vote-lead-key-states-204705391--election.html
Okay...let's try again. Did you read what I wrote? Obviously not, based on the article. So are you going to address the specific points or are you here just to stir the pot?
jdavionic
11-04-2012, 17:39
Early voting in OH. Rove noted on FoxNews this morning...
GOP has increased their early turnout by more than 100k from 2008. Dems down 150k. That is 250k net (Obama won in 2008 by 260k). Historically, GOP has a much stronger turnout on election day.
frank4570
11-04-2012, 17:48
I got a question ? Who really has that much faith that either man can change much of anything ?
If he even wants to.
Averageman
11-04-2012, 19:18
I'm gonna clue you in on something.
You think Romney had a religous mission in France? He has a religous mission to save America, I am not kidding.
If you know a Mormon ask them if they have been told that the Mormon Preisthood would save America before it is destroyed.
Honestly this stuff worries me, but I do trust Romney to do the right thing.
As a former Mormon Iam gonna go home and restock my food supply for 2 + years and sit back and watch the Drama.
Jade Falcon
11-04-2012, 20:34
OOH good one Jade....
How long did you contemplate on that before posting? I'm betting somewhere north of 90 minutes or so.
You and Drew could use a 40 ounce can of frothy SOLOMON JUICE before you log on.
Nalajr
Glad you liked it. :supergrin:
Hey, I voted for Romney on my ballot too, but that doesn't mean I think he will win. He's an NRA endorsed politician, so I voted for gun rights.
the polls always seem to be unreliable unless they are providing the desired results...:rofl:
What do you think the GB should be on a national poll? Would you consider a D +11 to be an accurate picture of the nation politically?
that is one poll, the picture I posted was an average of many polls...:upeyes:
With Arianna doing the math.'08.:upeyes:
Fear Night
11-05-2012, 07:22
Anybody confident in polling needs a little history review of the 1980 Presidential election. The stage is set in a similar fashion - same crappy economy, same clueless Democrat.
The difference is, Carter had a much wider lead in the polls than Obama does now :tongueout:
RimfireMan
11-06-2012, 21:13
Where is the Romney landslide?
Where is the Romney landslide?
I was wondering that myself... :whistling:
RimfireMan
11-06-2012, 21:17
:tongueout:I was wondering that myself... :whistling:
Looks like a bust for Romney.
Philippe
11-06-2012, 21:18
Well 4 more years.......
RyanBDawg
11-06-2012, 21:23
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-O4g0g8d3vBs/UDp_lRYb_EI/AAAAAAAALLo/HlTUwtO3YvM/s1600/mitt-romney-loser-325x360.jpg
Death to the republican party, death to the moral police.
One party of the two headed monster is severely wounded, now to destroy the other!
Told you so. The margin of the asks kicking was bigger than the number of libertarians. Blame is squarely on GOP.
Nope...Romney is gonna lose, simple as that. The GOP deserves it too, for putting up a sh-t nominee. Can't wait for 2016 to see who the next flaming RINO will be.
Yep, can't say I didn't agree
Romney win. I'm gonna go with "no" on that one.
Yep, can't say I didn't agree
Yep, I called it in post #12 of this thread, and nobody wanted to hear it. The Republicans are living in a dream world.
RyanBDawg
11-06-2012, 21:42
Yep, I called it in post #12 of this thread, and nobody wanted to hear it. The Republicans are living in a dream world.
They certainly are. We libertarians have been bashed for months by the fools who though Romney was somehow "conservative".
Are any of you listening now?
The morality police republicans, sorry, you no longer are relevant.
camelotkid
11-06-2012, 21:46
I have been trying to get on here all night I would just like to say... I told you so!!
Sadly instead of learning anything from this I bet the idiot GOP is probably scratching their heads trying to think of who they can run that is even more liberal than Romney in 2016.
KalashniKEV
11-06-2012, 22:09
Sadly instead of learning anything from this I bet the idiot GOP is probably scratching their heads trying to think of who they can run that is even more liberal than Romney in 2016.
+1000
I called this shizz....
Eurodriver
11-06-2012, 22:13
+1000
I called this shizz....
All the die hard repubs I know are like whhaaattt happenneeeddd....
And I'm all like
"Romney is Obama, bro"
They certainly are. We libertarians have been bashed for months by the fools who though Romney was somehow "conservative".
Are any of you listening now?
The morality police republicans, sorry, you no longer are relevant.
Just wait until 2016, I'm pretty certain we'll get a good laugh at the GOP contenders yet again.
Yeah, Obama won months ago when the GOP nominated Romney.
What was that about wasting my vote on a third party candidate that can't win??
In that case you might as well vote Obama. Romney is going to lose and be just as much not the president as Gary Johnson.
Yeah, Obama won months ago when the GOP nominated Romney.
What was that about wasting my vote on a third party candidate that can't win??
Apparently the GOP can't even get their own guy to win. :rofl:
Big_Grumpy
11-06-2012, 22:31
Take a serious step back and look at yourselves.
How can either of you "two party" supporters proudly vote for your candidates?
Romney/Ryan - Supporting espionage on Americans, GUN BANS, free market manipulation, bailouts, medical care, and wars. Have you seen the flip flop videos???? Unbelievable.
Obama/Biden - Well... ditto.
If some joker came in GNG acting like either of these 2 clowns trying to explain themselves, he'd be laughed and ridiculed right the freak out of here. It's really sad what the voting standard has become.
When will it EVER be a time to get behind someone with a degree of integrity? The answer is/was now. But yet it's another dog and pony show.
A late word from Paul. It's from CNN and the chick sounds like Kool Aid drinker, but I think it's worth a listen.
CNN Still Begging Ron Paul to Endorse Romney Last Minute on Election Day! - YouTube
I have electoral as 303 Obama, 206 Romney as of now. The popular vote is 58,156,996 vs. 56,130,459 for the "two" candidates. Waiting on Florida but she's leaning blue.
Enjoy more of the same.
Ah well, here we go again. Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran...
ETA: RECOUNT RECOUNT!! (and update numbers)
FFR Spyder GT
11-06-2012, 23:21
Apparently the GOP can't even get their own guy to win. :rofl:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-O4g0g8d3vBs/UDp_lRYb_EI/AAAAAAAALLo/HlTUwtO3YvM/s1600/mitt-romney-loser-325x360.jpg
HollowHead
11-06-2012, 23:26
Sadly instead of learning anything from this I bet the idiot GOP is probably scratching their heads trying to think of who they can run that is even more liberal than Romney in 2016.
They need to run someone who is more conservative and less republican. HH
Sadly instead of learning anything from this I bet the idiot GOP is probably scratching their heads trying to think of who they can run that is even more liberal than Romney in 2016.
Help me understand this. Should the Republicans find someone who will step in the social dog sheet of gays and abortion EVEN more? Should the Republicans find someone who will be EVEN more hypocritical, calling for smaller government and less regulation while trying to pass laws (on the above) that have zero to do with running the country?
The Dems seem (operative word there) to be smart enough to avoid the gun issues, at least publicly. I know they are working behind the scenes. Will the Republicans learn to let go some of the issues that have lost them the race now twice? Dunno.
Again, help me out here. I TOTALLY get that Romney was not ideal, but the way I see it, he lost because of the typical Republican right wing religious pandering, not because he was too moderate.
The door was opened during the primaries, with that whole circus about who was more hardcore. Who would follow the bible most closely. Biggest gift that could possibly have been handed the Democrats and they didn't waste an ounce of it.
I guess we'll have to hope for Chris Christie in 2016, or is he not hard core enough? Not worrying about what everyone does in their private lives enough?
-Stooxie
Let's not forget he was also the man who invented obamacare and had a history of signing AWB. Not to mention dozens of other non-fiscal conservative elements to his voting history.
Then on top of that they made the Massachusetts moderate pander to the American Taliban.
They need a guy who is a true fiscal conservative with principle. Socially he should be for small government.
Help me understand this. Should the Republicans find someone who will step in the social dog sheet of gays and abortion EVEN more? Should the Republicans find someone who will be EVEN more hypocritical, calling for smaller government and less regulation while trying to pass laws (on the above) that have zero to do with running the country?
The Dems seem (operative word there) to be smart enough to avoid the gun issues, at least publicly. I know they are working behind the scenes. Will the Republicans learn to let go some of the issues that have lost them the race now twice? Dunno.
Again, help me out here. I TOTALLY get that Romney was not ideal, but the way I see it, he lost because of the typical Republican right wing religious pandering, not because he was too moderate.
The door was opened during the primaries, with that whole circus about who was more hardcore. Who would follow the bible most closely. Biggest gift that could possibly have been handed the Democrats and they didn't waste an ounce of it.
I guess we'll have to hope for Chris Christie in 2016, or is he not hard core enough? Not worrying about what everyone does in their private lives enough?
-Stooxie
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.