UN Warns US: "Don't Elect Mitt Romney!" [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : UN Warns US: "Don't Elect Mitt Romney!"


50 Cent
10-21-2012, 09:19
The UN is really trying to set itself up for a fall:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/21/UN-Warns-Americans-Do-Not-Elect-Mitt-Romney

Angry Fist
10-21-2012, 09:21
These *******s need to be tortured.

coastal4974
10-21-2012, 09:23
All the more reason to vote twice

G17Jake
10-21-2012, 09:25
If the UN says to NOT vote for Romney, that is like an endorsement TO vote for Romney, in my opinion.

shotgunred
10-21-2012, 09:25
The UN wants a weak US! Obama wants a weak US!

This is just more voter intimidation like all the threats of blood in the streets if Obama loses.

Providence
10-21-2012, 09:35
"The re-introduction of torture under a Romney administration would significantly increase the threat levels to (Americans) at home and abroad," Emmerson said. "Such a policy, if adopted, would expose the American people to risks the Obama administration is not currently exposing them to."

This sounds like denial to me. We are safe now? Wasn't that story line part of the reason for the Benghazi cover-up? Well, that and the fact that we've now gotten ourselves into an arms deal with al Qaeda?

Sorry, I guess I'm a off subject.

dpadams6
10-21-2012, 09:35
The first think Romney needs to do once he gets in is pull us out of the un completely and boot them out of new York. Un needs us. We do not need them. Their relevance is no longer.

Clutch Cargo
10-21-2012, 09:45
When Romney takes office, he should push for the U.S. to immediately stop all funding and leave the U.N.

Providence
10-21-2012, 09:50
From your lips to God's ear!

bmoore
10-21-2012, 10:19
United Nothings. Romney really has my vote now (not that he ever didn't).

sourdough44
10-21-2012, 10:21
All the more reason to vote for Mitt.

JW1178
10-21-2012, 10:28
LMAO.... I find that funny. I guess they like the POTUS to say one thing and do another. Although they all do that, Obama said in 2008 how he would close GITMO and a bunch of other stuff but didn't do much of it, so I don't think it's about that.

Judging by the photo on that story, I say it's because they want further muslim empowerment and Obama is their best choice. Obama is the best thing to happen to Isliamics since, well, Mohammad, who was probably much like Obama.

sns3guppy
10-21-2012, 10:38
The article is without credibility and anyone who stands to cheer over it is an idiot.

Bin Ladin was located based on waterboarding in 2004, and yet despite moves and billions of dollars spend trying to find him, and the administration's inability to locate Bin Ladin, that waterboarding yielded the death of Bin Ladin's death seven years later? Ridiculous.

The article all but attempts to return the credit for finding and killing Bin Ladin to the Bush administration. That's certainly not true.

The web site linked above is agenda-driven, hardly newsworthy, and contains a great deal of incorrect or false information. However for those of you who are cheerleaders no matter what the facts, cheer on. You'll be 100% wrong in ways a blind man can see, but you don't really care about that, do you?

mac66
10-21-2012, 10:55
"However for those of you who are cheerleaders no matter what the facts, cheer on. You'll be 100% wrong in ways a blind man can see, but you don't really care about that, do you? "

sns3guppy,

What will "cheerleaders" be 100% wrong about?
What do you know that you aren't telling them?
Are you saying cheerleaders should care about the UN's warning?
What does this story have to do with cheers and blind men anyway?

I really don't understand what your point it unless it comes with a sound track of diabolical, sinister laughter behind it.

Providence
10-21-2012, 11:05
The article is without credibility and anyone who stands to cheer over it is an idiot.

Bin Ladin was located based on waterboarding in 2004, and yet despite moves and billions of dollars spend trying to find him, and the administration's inability to locate Bin Ladin, that waterboarding yielded the death of Bin Ladin's death seven years later? Ridiculous.

The article all but attempts to return the credit for finding and killing Bin Ladin to the Bush administration. That's certainly not true.

The web site linked above is agenda-driven, hardly newsworthy, and contains a great deal of incorrect or false information. However for those of you who are cheerleaders no matter what the facts, cheer on. You'll be 100% wrong in ways a blind man can see, but you don't really care about that, do you?
Facts is facts. You don't have to like them, and you are free to interpret as you wish. But they are still facts. The chain of intelligence is established. And as far as your point about the article defending Bush, I don't think it means water boarding is effective. That would be an interpretation.

From the article: "U.S. intelligence services were able to pinpoint Osama bin Laden's location and carry out the successful mission to kill him in May 2011 based on information yielded during waterboarding of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and information from Al Qaeda operative Hassan Ghul, who was captured in Iraq in 2004."

The clue to your lack of facts was labeling people as idiots if they think the UN wanting Obama to win is a shame. So let me ask, do you think it's okay that the UN has interjected itself in our election debate? Do you agree with the UN?

frizz
10-21-2012, 11:30
Facts is facts. You don't have to like them, and you are free to interpret as you wish. But they are still facts. The chain of intelligence is established. And as far as your point, I don't think it means water boarding is effective. That would be an interpretation.

From the article: "U.S. intelligence services were able to pinpoint Osama bin Laden’s location and carry out the successful mission to kill him in May 2011 based on information yielded during waterboarding of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and information from Al Qaeda operative Hassan Ghul, who was captured in Iraq in 2004."

The clue to your lack of facts was labeling people as idiots if they think the UN wanting Obama to win is a shame. So let ,e ask,do you think it's okay that the UN has interjected itself in our election debate? Do you agree with the UN?

This post makes no sense it all. It is a disjointed rambling that goes nowhere.

Do you want to try that again? Also, if you are replying to someone, quote them or at least mention the name.

treeline
10-21-2012, 12:04
nevermind, not worth it

Providence
10-21-2012, 12:09
This post makes no sense it all. It is a disjointed rambling that goes nowhere.

Do you want to try that again? Also, if you are replying to someone, quote them or at least mention the name.I fixed it for you. If it still makes no sense, then I don't know how to help you. Maybe I'm just not making sense today.

frizz
10-21-2012, 12:25
I fixed it for you. If it still makes no sense, then I don't know how to help you. Maybe I'm just not making sense today.

Just this one sentence is indecipherable:

The clue to your lack of facts was labeling people as idiots if they think the UN wanting Obama to win is a shame.

The rest has more than just typographical errors. I have no idea what you are trying to say.

G19Tony
10-21-2012, 14:29
All the more reason to vote twice

If you're in Chicago, you can. :rofl:

mgs
10-21-2012, 14:29
I vote to throw the UN out of the USA!!!!

g30sfjeepguy
10-21-2012, 14:31
Ill second that.

mgs
10-21-2012, 14:32
All those in favor signify by saying I.

jpa
10-21-2012, 14:39
LMAO.... I find that funny. I guess they like the POTUS to say one thing and do another. Although they all do that, Obama said in 2008 how he would close GITMO and a bunch of other stuff but didn't do much of it, so I don't think it's about that.

Judging by the photo on that story, I say it's because they want further muslim empowerment and Obama is their best choice. Obama is the best thing to happen to Isliamics since, well, Mohammad, who was probably much like Obama.

I agree. "Sure, we'll stop waterboarding terrorists..." (wink wink, nudge nudge)

"Sure, we're making every effort to close Gitmo...." (wink wink, nudge nudge)

We have no verifiable proof that prisoners aren't being waterboarded or the president is actively working to close Gitmo. We just have the president's statement that he won't allow waterboarding and he wants to close Gitmo. Actions speak louder than words....

Averageman
10-21-2012, 14:43
If you're in Chicago, you can. :rofl:
When Mayor Richard Daley was in Office the dead voted....and often!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1960


As a matter of fact, they still do.

http://www.championnews.net/2012/10/03/investigation-uncovers-20640-dead-voters-in-illinois/

BuckyP
10-21-2012, 14:46
From the article: "U.S. intelligence services were able to pinpoint Osama bin Laden's location and carry out the successful mission to kill him in May 2011 based on information yielded during waterboarding of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and information from Al Qaeda operative Hassan Ghul, who was captured in Iraq in 2004."


I had not heard this. If this is true, we may not have gotten Bin Laden had we not been in Iraq?

JuneyBooney
10-21-2012, 21:09
All the more reason to vote twice


For Romney..:cool:..

Dragoon189
10-21-2012, 21:24
not like anyone listens to the UN anymore.

janice6
10-21-2012, 21:45
To hell with any one or anything outside of the USA, telling the United States Of America who they should elect. Screw them. (and their funding)

RWBlue
10-21-2012, 21:50
I think it is time to cut UN funding for the next 4 years, maybe 8 years to help balance the budget.

NEOH212
10-21-2012, 22:21
Of course the UN won't endorse Romney. The want a communist in office.

Did anybody really expect anything different from the UN?

How many countries in the UN are socialist after all?

NEOH212
10-21-2012, 22:22
to hell with any one or anything outside of the usa, telling the united states of america who they should elect. Screw them. (and their funding)

Amen!

dabigguns357
10-21-2012, 23:13
To hell with any one or anything outside of the USA, telling the United States Of America who they should elect. Screw them. (and their funding)


I second your motion and raise ya another


AMEN

JLB768
10-21-2012, 23:29
When you hear the sound of UN, don't you get too scared, just grab your 2A buddy, and say these magic words...

gwalchmai
10-22-2012, 05:10
The first think Romney needs to do once he gets in is pull us out of the un completely and boot them out of new York.

Amen, brother. Turn that UN building into a WalMart.

Baba Louie
10-22-2012, 05:16
United Nations Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights... :upeyes: HUH? Oh... Reporter... I like the Rapporteur version better. Sounds more... I dunno... french? :whistling:

What was he saying again? Anything I should care about? Thought not.

I'm still waiting on our glorious leader to earn his Nobel Peace Prize (should Romney win, I doubt he'll be so rewarded) for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. MUAHAHAHAHA oh... sorry. Those people seem to live in another world, certainly a different world than my own day to day.

But... I did learn a new word today, so that's good. I guess.

Cali-Glock
10-22-2012, 05:35
So the UN is sending election/poll monitors to Ohio to make sure "conservatives" don't steal the election, and now they are directly telling us not to elect Romney?

This stinks to high heaven. Hmm why do i think it is auite likely Obama will "win" the election.

IndyGunFreak
10-22-2012, 05:41
If the UN says to NOT vote for Romney, that is like an endorsement TO vote for Romney, in my opinion.

That's my opinion.

dpadams6
10-22-2012, 06:51
Amen, brother. Turn that UN building into a WalMart.

Ha. I like that. Can be their headquarters building. The un is so irrelevant to the U.S. I can not figure out what we gain from it. Every time we try to do something good, china and russia use their veto power and nothing happens. And we contribute, I believe somewhere around 25% of its entire budget. IT IS HIGH TIME FOR THE U.S.TO CUT ITS TIES WITH U.N. Without U.S. it probably could not survive.

captcurly
10-22-2012, 07:56
I vote to throw the UN out of the USA!!!!
I have been in favor of this for years. If the UN does not want Romney elected all the more reason to vote him in. I am really with you on this MGS.

RWBlue
10-22-2012, 08:23
Ha. I like that. Can be their headquarters building. The un is so irrelevant to the U.S. I can not figure out what we gain from it. Every time we try to do something good, china and russia use their veto power and nothing happens. And we contribute, I believe somewhere around 25% of its entire budget. IT IS HIGH TIME FOR THE U.S.TO CUT ITS TIES WITH U.N. Without U.S. it probably could not survive.

It is the stuff we don't hear about that makes the UN valuable to US.

If you read the wikileak stuff you will find a lot of cooperation between the USA and other countries which don't want it public that they are cooperating with us.


But when they start this **** it, it is time to cut them off financially for a few years. This will keep them in check.

itstime
10-22-2012, 08:26
If the UN says to NOT vote for Romney, that is like an endorsement TO vote for Romney, in my opinion.

You have that right.

Bren
10-22-2012, 09:40
The last time I ran into somebody working for the UN, we raked an up-armored humvee very slowly down the whole length of his SUV, as he was sitting in it, laughed at him as we went by, then continued on without stopping. It was pretty funny, of it hadn't been so overshadowed the the hilarity of the rest of that trip.

series1811
10-22-2012, 09:51
The article is without credibility and anyone who stands to cheer over it is an idiot.

Bin Ladin was located based on waterboarding in 2004, and yet despite moves and billions of dollars spend trying to find him, and the administration's inability to locate Bin Ladin, that waterboarding yielded the death of Bin Ladin's death seven years later? Ridiculous.

The article all but attempts to return the credit for finding and killing Bin Ladin to the Bush administration. That's certainly not true.

The web site linked above is agenda-driven, hardly newsworthy, and contains a great deal of incorrect or false information. However for those of you who are cheerleaders no matter what the facts, cheer on. You'll be 100% wrong in ways a blind man can see, but you don't really care about that, do you?

So, you are going to vote for Obama again?

SC Tiger
10-22-2012, 09:59
To quote Rabbi, if we elect Romney:

What the hell would the UN do....shout?

dpadams6
10-22-2012, 10:06
It is the stuff we don't hear about that makes the UN valuable to US.

If you read the wikileak stuff you will find a lot of cooperation between the USA and other countries which don't want it public that they are cooperating with us.


But when they start this **** it, it is time to cut them off financially for a few years. This will keep them in check.
Such as ? We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I see a lot of giving on the U.S. part and nothing in return. Listen to someone in the know: Former ambassador to the un John Bolton

RWBlue
10-22-2012, 10:39
Such as ? We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I see a lot of giving on the U.S. part and nothing in return. Listen to someone in the know: Former ambassador to the un John Bolton

Read Wikileaks. It is kind of entertaining in a "good lord this world is messed up kind of way."

wjv
10-22-2012, 10:45
The UN can go eff themselves. . . .

Sharkey
10-22-2012, 10:47
If the UN says to NOT vote for Romney, that is like an endorsement TO vote for Romney, in my opinion.


True dat.

Let us not forget the communist and socialist leaders around the world that endorse Barack. :shocked:

pizza_pablo
10-22-2012, 10:56
if the un says to not vote for romney, that is like an endorsement to vote for romney, in my opinion.

กกกprecisely!!!

SGT278ACR
10-22-2012, 11:47
Just a bunch of panicky pre-election propaganda. :whistling:

dpadams6
10-22-2012, 12:30
Read Wikileaks. It is kind of entertaining in a "good lord this world is messed up kind of way."

Ok. I'll check it out.