sopdan
12-03-2012, 01:21
http://au.news.yahoo.com/vic/latest/a/-/newshome/15536791/vic-family-win-reprieve-to-stop-autopsy/
In a nutshell: (from what I got from the article)
-girl supposedly unattended outside, found hanging from swing set by jump rope
-"A forensic pathologist who examined Sarah's body the day after the accident had been unable to find a reasonable medical cause of death"
-family says they just want to bury their daughter
-state Supreme Court Justice says no full autopsy required... "procedure would unreasonably deepen the family's anguish."
I think this is an interesting case, because if it was truly an accident, I can totally see the parents' side of the argument. But if it was foul play on behalf of the parents... I can totally see the parents' side of the argument.
In a nutshell: (from what I got from the article)
-girl supposedly unattended outside, found hanging from swing set by jump rope
-"A forensic pathologist who examined Sarah's body the day after the accident had been unable to find a reasonable medical cause of death"
-family says they just want to bury their daughter
-state Supreme Court Justice says no full autopsy required... "procedure would unreasonably deepen the family's anguish."
I think this is an interesting case, because if it was truly an accident, I can totally see the parents' side of the argument. But if it was foul play on behalf of the parents... I can totally see the parents' side of the argument.