Concealing G26 [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : Concealing G26


frontier2011
12-20-2012, 19:51
I think they were looking for a concealed G26.
The video of search is at bottom of page.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2250218/Angel-Ashley-Dobbs-suing-Texas-troopers-shocking-BODY-CAVITY-search-caught-tape.html

PaulMason
12-20-2012, 20:34
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2251163/US-Olympian-Suzy-Favor-Hamilton-spent-year-working-600-hour-Vegas-escort.html?ICO=most_read_module

$600/hr for that skinny ...

jthrelf
12-20-2012, 20:45
I DO NOT CONSENT TO SEARCHES

very useful words!

frontier2011
12-20-2012, 20:57
I DO NOT CONSENT TO SEARCHES

very useful words!

yea, like that would matter......:rofl:

Louisville Glocker
12-20-2012, 22:16
Horribly invasive. I suspect the lawsuit will be successful. Very poor policework.

But civilians, you should never give up your rights. They had no reason to conduct an invasive search. A Terry frisk, yes, but not body cavities. When asked if you can be searched, say no. The LEO would not be asking for permission unless they need it.

Unfortunately, (or fortunately, depending on perspective), it is very easy to talk people into giving up their rights. "I'll go easy on you if you let me search, but if you don't it could be a lot of trouble..." etc. "We'll have to bring you downtown, " blah blah blah. People usually give in too easily. You should refuse to be searched. That goes for cars, backpacks, person, etc.

glock_collector
12-21-2012, 19:44
If you are gonna put your hand in my bungholiooo, the least you can do is buy me dinner first.

frontier2011
12-21-2012, 22:54
If you are gonna put your hand in my bungholiooo, the least you can do is buy me dinner first.

I think she got the John Travolta special. :rofl::rofl:

FriarTuck
12-22-2012, 15:33
Horribly invasive.

I agree. It appeared to me that the police were looking for marijuana, not the most serious offense. And the ladies being searched were being cooperative, and therefore due more respect, IMHO.

Someone noted the officer apparently didn't change her gloves between searches. Furthermore, she searched the rear first, then the front. This could introduce coliform bacteria near these female urethras, which are shorter and straighter than in the male, rendering a greater risk of developing cystitis, a serious infection.

Those police, IMHO, need to change their ways.

SCmasterblaster
12-23-2012, 17:56
I just would NOT CONSENT TO THE SEARCH. And sue the daylights out of them if they forced it on me.