Newspaper Hires Armed Guards After Publishing Gun Owner Addresses

[pipedreams]

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/01/02/newspaper-hires-armed-guards-after-publishing-gun-owner-addresses-n1477708

Liberals do not want armed guards in schools to protect children but it is perfectly alright for Liberals to hire armed guards to protect reporters that want to take away my right to own weapons.

[racer11]

There are no words to describe their selfish stupidity.

[G29Reload]

That is just rich and another sign that stupid must hurt.

[Bello]

That's too funny

[true believer]

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:and 1 more:rofl:

[Cavalry Doc]

https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/2816970539/092b1803fcbe2b22f95acc4e80a44847.jpeg

[PVolk]

I saw this in the news and burst into laughter.

I hope they waste alot of money on their armed gaurds too.

[misunderestimated]

Some more comments on it

http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1461596

[the iceman]

So newspaper exercises 1st amendment rights blasting those who exercise their 2nd amendment rights, then hires people who will exercise the 2nd amendment to protect their 1st amendment rights.

Oh the irony...

[cowboywannabe]

use guns to protect me, but not to protect the children of thee.

get in line you tax mules.

[jeager]

Haven't the addresses of those guards been compramized?
paper should be charged double!
Are police w/ off duty weapons not exposed as well?
animal farm

[oldman11]

Haven't the addresses of those guards been compramized?
paper should be charged double!
Are police w/ off duty weapons not exposed as well?
animal farm
Yes definitely, officers and their families security has been compromised. This paper is definitely a commie rag and they should be arrested, jailed as commie terrorists. Obama has brought us to the brink.

[GLWyandotte]

Hardy har har harrrrr

[true believer]

So newspaper exercises 1st amendment rights blasting those who exercise their 2nd amendment rights, then hires people who will exercise the 2nd amendment to protect their 1st amendment rights.

Oh the irony...

bingo!!
:whistling:

[Cavalry Doc]

Some more comments on it

http://www.glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1461596

Hit it.



Thank you for voting!
Yes. Who has a permit is no one else's business; only police and prosecutors should have access to that information.
88.71% (1,037 votes)

No. A gun permit is a public permit. I have a right to know who the permit holders are in my neighborhood.
11.29% (132 votes)


Total Votes: 1,169

[Roering]

Why not just declare it a "gun free zone"?

:rofl:

[Gallium]

Why not just declare it a "gun free zone"?

:rofl:


It can't be gun free and intelligent free simultaneously.

[Cavalry Doc]

Haven't the addresses of those guards been compramized?
paper should be charged double!
Are police w/ off duty weapons not exposed as well?
animal farm

Charged double. Sure, that AND the guards should tell them that they will be armed, but only for self defense. If there is a threat to the building, they will run away while dialing 911.

Good luck.

[sappy13]

wow, thats some bull****.

[the iceman]

Fair is fair. The public has the right to know where those who exercise their 1st amendment rights are located.

http://www.newrochelletalk.com/content/map-where-are-journal-news-employees-your-neighborhood

[HollowHead]

Excellent! Does anyone know of a primary source so this can be shared? Thanks, HH

[Pepiot]

wow, thats some bull****.

+1...

[stevelyn]

I hope none of those hired guns are dumb enough to take a hit or put themselves at risk for those d-bags.

[Jake Starr]

Charged double. Sure, that AND the guards should tell them that they will be armed, but only for self defense. If there is a threat to the building, they will run away while dialing 911.



That is all that they are ever supposed to do.

[Gallium]

That is all that they are ever supposed to do.


Not in NY, according to the penal code there.

[Drain You]

B b b but who will protect them from the ARMED guards?

[Bren]

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2013/01/02/newspaper-hires-armed-guards-after-publishing-gun-owner-addresses-n1477708

Liberals do not want armed guards in schools to protect children but it is perfectly alright for Liberals to hire armed guards to protect reporters that want to take away my right to own weapons.

So, let's see; they now believe:

1. Gun are necessary for protection; and
2. Having your name and address published makes you a crime target

The irony can't get much stronger with these lowlife pieces of ----.

[misunderestimated]

This is a link to some interesting journalism. Notice when they arrive at the homes of the Journal news Employees they all have armed Guards at the homes.
http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2013/20130118006-exposing-project.html

[Cavalry Doc]

Why not just declare it a "gun free zone"?

:rofl:

You can't expect them to do much that requires inteligence. Maybe we could talk to the neighbors about some signs.

http://mksviews.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/stupid_neighbor.jpg

[jellis11]

I bet it's just a way for them to "show" that they are scared of gun nuts coming to attack them in retaliation. Just to get people thinking the worst...

[Cavalry Doc]

I bet it's just a way for them to "show" that they are scared of gun nuts coming to attack them in retaliation. Just to get people thinking the worst...

But shouldn't they just have crisis counselors and signs?

The hypocrisy is rich in this story. Heard that thee has been at least one robbery tied to the stuff they published. Hope they are sued into oblivion.

[ustate]

I just hope their armed security remember to only have 7 rounds of ammo in the magazines.

[Cavalry Doc]

I just hope their armed security remember to only have 7 rounds of ammo in the magazines.

Better yet. They should have to carry 7 round clips.

[Peace Warrior]

Hypocrisy, meet Irony. Irony, meet Hypocrisy.

[High Altitude]

@ProjectVeritas_ Journalists, Politicians Refuse to Post Lawn Sign saying "HOME IS PROUDLY GUN FREE" - YouTube

[janice6]

So How safe do guns make you feel now B****es?

[janice6]

@ProjectVeritas_ Journalists, Politicians Refuse to Post Lawn Sign saying "HOME IS PROUDLY GUN FREE" - YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt1Zy_ASNyA)


The interesting thing here is that in spite of believing guns are bad, these people against guns want the bad guys to "think they may have guns" and that is their protection from evil. these people are called hypocrites. Their safety is actually being provided by the fact that "some" people have guns but the BG's don't know who.

Nice. These anti-gun leeches are living off our efforts of self protection and will not admit it.

[wjv]

>> Journal News Rockland Editor Caryn A. McBride

A woman. . . Why am I not surprised. . .

[misunderestimated]

But shouldn't they just have crisis counselors and signs?

The hypocrisy is rich in this story. Heard that thee has been at least one robbery tied to the stuff they published. Hope they are sued into oblivion.


This is the second home on the list has been burglarized since the list has been published


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/17/weapons-stolen-from-ny-home-gun-owner-named-on-journal-news-website/

[Cavalry Doc]

I sure hope the GOA, NRA & SAF are offering to help their members on that list in preparing their class action suit.

[4095fanatic]

Hopefully they can be found to bear at least partial responsibility for this.

[railfancwb]

Hope the newspaper, its editor, publisher, and involved reporter get their butts sued off by those who have been robbed or where robbery attempts were made.

In fact a class action suit in the name of all those put at excessive risk by the paper might be productive.


Posted using Outdoor Hub Campfire (http://www.outdoorhub.com/mobile/)