Bull Barrel or Standard Barrel w/ Bushing?

[Nestor]

I'm learning about 1911 design now, but I can't find much about it.
Which type of setup is better in terms of reliability (for combat gun)?

Pros and Cons of each, please...

Thank you,

Adam

[SamColtFan]

The cost of a barrel bushing is far less than the cost of a new slide. But, discounting wear, both systems work.

Regards,
Sam

[Brooklyn South]

Kimber and Wilson Combat seem to have liked this system of the bull barrel and no bushing in their 4" guns. My two 4 " Kimbers seem to work fine that way.

I was a little surprised to see the new Wilson Combat brochure with a 5" CQB with what looks like a bull barrel and no bushing. It may be the "better mousetrap!"

Good luck & good shooting!
:) :) :) :)

[nickE10mm]

A disadvantage would be that some say that the bushingless system allows more dirt or debris and grit to enter the action through the space made between barrel and slide, which would pose a reliability concern.

An advantage would be a more forward-heavy gun for quicker follow up shots.

I have often pondered the accuracy difference. According to the 'smith's i've talked to about it, accuracy should be the same for each (all other things being equal.

I have a Kimber Custom 2 in .45ACP converted to .45Super with match barrel fitted by a smith for accuracy. I have the bushingless system on that gun. I also have a Kimber Target 10mm that is almost bone stock. The guns are both more accurate than I am. I have had ZERO reliability issues with either gun. I love my Kimbers, moreso than all of my Glocks, past and present.

According to my sources, the most important aspect of accuracy with barrel fitting is at the chamber end (lock up) area of the gun, not the bushing.

...food for thought. Good luck in your quest for knowledge

-Nick

[Nestor]

Thanks a lot :)