Great article on the M1 Carbine. [Archive] - Glock Talk

View Full Version : Great article on the M1 Carbine.


Kentuckian
06-05-2006, 05:44
The M1 Carbine For SELF-DEFENSE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT.

Guns Magazine; 6/1/2001; KARWAN, CHARLES

SHOOTERS SEEKING A HIGH-PERFORMANCE TACTICAL CARBINE WITHOUT A HIGH-TECH PRICE TAG ARE REDISCOVERING THIS VERSATILE, VINTAGE FIREARM.

Police agencies and armed citizens need a good long arm to supplement their handgun for defensive purposes. There are very few situations where a person is better off defending himself with a handgun than a good long gun, if the latter is available.

Here the definition of long gun is a shoulder-fired weapon like a rifle, carbine, submachine gun, assault rifle or shotgun. There is a readily available, often overlooked long gun that is superb for this purpose that can out-perform most of its high-tech, expensive competition -- the M1 carbine.

In recent years the traditional shotgun has been losing favor with both police and civilians for defensive use. The reasons for this include excessive recoil, a high degree of proficiency in operation, potential collateral damage from the buckshot pattern, and the limited effective range with buckshot.

In answer, many departments, individual officers and armed civilians have turned to semi-automatic rifles or carbines in either pistol calibers or .223 for use as tactical long guns. Some law enforcement agencies have turned to submachine guns.

All of these guns offer improved ballistic performance and practical accuracy over a handgun. However, none of the pistol-caliber carbines or submachine guns are nearly as effective as the old and often unfairly maligned .30 Ml carbine.

With proper ammunition, the M1 carbine can easily compete in effectiveness with .223-chambered weapons out to at least 150 yards, and few police or civilians have any business shooting at anybody farther away than that.

In addition, the M1 carbine weighs only 5 1/2 lbs., making it a pound or more lighter than most of its competition, including even the pistol-caliber carbines, and considerably lighter than many like the UZI submachine gun at 8.8 lbs. or the M16A2 at 7.9 lbs.

Born Far Combat

The M1 carbine has many other assets as well. It has superb reliability under the worst field conditions. Its accuracy exceeds that of virtually all the pistol-caliber carbines and submachine guns on the market and is comparable with that of many of the semi-automatic .223 rifles.

Another huge advantage for the M1 carbine is that, unlike most modern firearms, it has pre-ban high capacity 15- and 30-round magazines readily available in quantity at very modest prices. The same holds true for spare parts and accessories.

Ballistically, the M1 carbine's little .30 Carbine cartridge packs about 2.5 times the kinetic energy of a standard .45 ACP or 9mm load fired from a pistol. This is solidly in the energy territory of the .44 Mag. revolver. Indeed it has only 90 ft./lbs. less energy at the muzzle than the Russian 5.45x39mm cartridge and is only a little farther behind the .223 when fired from 14.5" or 16" barreled carbines.

Options And Tactics

Although a cartridge's muzzle energy is not the sole criterion for measuring its effectiveness, it is a good indication of the cartridge's potential if it is loaded with properly designed expanding bullets. With military-type FMJ bullets, the .30 Carbine will drill right through car bodies and such.

This capability is highly desirable to police officers in many situations. When the .30 Carbine cartridge is loaded with expanding bullets, its effectiveness as a manstopper increases exponentially. One police unit used M1 carbines loaded with JSPs in several shootings. They found the carbines to be extremely effective. Quoting one of their more experienced officers about the results from shootings with a .30 Carbine using expanding bullet ammunition, "We never had to shoot anyone twice."

Out to at least 150 yards, the .30 Carbine cartridge usually makes a more serious wound than does the .223, .308 or .30-'06, when the latter are used with FMJ bullets. It is also greatly superior to any of the common defensive pistol rounds fired from a handgun or carbine, even when the latter uses hollow point ammunition.

Even the FMJ .30 Carbine load is far more effective than is commonly thought. After interviewing many veteran M1 carbine users from World War II, Korea and Vietnam, we found that the vast majority of these soldiers found the M1 carbine to be quite effective even with GI ball ammunition.

One former Marine who saw extensive combat with the MI carbine in the Pacific in World War II was quite emphatic that the little gun and its cartridge were effective in the close-range combat that he experienced. He also stated that he greatly preferred the M1 carbine to the Garand for that type of fighting because of its much lighter weight, shorter length and higher magazine capacity.

First-Hand Experience

Another veteran M1 carbine user interviewed was a U.S. Army Special Forces adviser in the early days of the Vietnam War. He had advised indigenous units armed almost exclusively with M1 carbines, and used the gun extensively himself in combat. He stated that the M1 carbine was very effective in the jungle combat that they typically experienced. Interestingly, he said that when M16s eventually replaced the M1 carbines, he found that the new gun offered little if any significant advantage in effectiveness over the older M1 carbines.

Probably the most authoritative account of the effectiveness of the M1 carbine in real combat comes from the superb book Shots Fired In Anger by John George. George served as a company grade officer in World War II in the famous Merrill's Marauders, operating behind Japanese lines. George was a highly experienced and successful service rifle competitor, shooter and hunter before the war, so all of his writing is from the perspective of someone highly knowledgeable about guns.

The M1 carbine was his primary weapon in the Marauders. The light weight of the carbine and its ammunition made it ideal for troops like the Marauders that carried all their supplies and equipment with them and were re-supplied by airdrops. His book covers several instances where he personally used or observed M1 carbines employed with great effect.

George reports, "The M1 carbine turned out to be the ace weapon of the war, as far as I am concerned. It was light and handy, powerful, and reasonably accurate ... The cartridge was powerful enough to penetrate several thicknesses of helmet, and to perforate the plates of the Japanese bulletproof vest, which would only be dented by .45 auto slugs. It was flat shooting enough to have practical accuracy at more than 200 yards ... For many types of offensive fighting, such as sneak raids and infiltration tactics, it was often superior even to the M1 (Garand), penetration being the only point of difference."

Full-Auto Follies

Late in World War II a selective-fire version of the M1 carbine was introduced as the M2 carbine. These saw little use in World War II, but were extensively used in Korea. Many of the accounts about the ineffectiveness of the .30 Carbine round come from improper and ineffective use of the M2 carbine on full auto.

Typically, the soldier or Marine dumped an entire magazine on full auto at a charging enemy with little or no effect. The probable truth is that in most instances it was ineffective because he simply missed. When firing the M2, if the first shot does not hit, none of the following shots will hit either, because the weapon will quickly climb off target, particularly with a long burst. The idea that anyone could absorb a magazine full of .30 Carbine bullets through the chest and keep coming is a myth born of bad shooting.

One must remember that these accounts are all about the M1 or M2 carbine using standard GI hardball ammunition. When this weapon is used with modern expanding bullets, its effectiveness against soft targets is increased considerably. One of the best .30 Carbine loads is the Winchester HSP. It is very accurate, feeding and expanding superbly and reliably.

A Cost Effective Warrior

An important asset of the Ml carbine is that two or three M1 carbines can be purchased for the price of one AR-15 or MP5 submachine gun. An affordable M1 carbine is worth more than all the expensive state-of-the-art rifles that you do not have when you need them, because you cannot afford them.

Something else in the Ml carbine's favor compared to all the submachine guns and rifles based on military assault rifles, is that it is relatively innocuous looking. Police do not like to be perceived as storm troopers, and the M1 carbine is much less likely to cause that impression than an AR-15 or an MP5,

The Ml carbine is too good a gun to be overlooked. Several hundred thousand of them are in circulation in the U.S., and many can be purchased at very reasonable prices. Israeli Arms International (IAI) and Springfield Inc. are currently offering excellent M1 carbines made to GI specifications using surplus military M1 carbine parts. Many more surplus Ml carbines are standing offshore, waiting to be imported into the U.S. under a favorable political climate.

For defensive fighting purposes typically encountered by police and armed civilians, an AR-15 or one of its better clones is perhaps preferable to the Ml carbine, if both are used with expanding bulleted ammunition. However, the Ml carbine with expanding bullet ammunition is more effective than any .223 rifle loaded with GI handball or any submachine gun or semiautomatic pistol-caliber carbine on the market. The Ml carbine is that good!

COPYRIGHT 2001 Publishers' Development Corporation

http://www.highbeam.com/library/docfree.asp?DOCID=1G1:74033105&ctrlInfo=Round20%3AMode20a%3ADocG%3AResult&ao=

thisaway
06-11-2006, 14:21
Neat article! :cool:

Yamadad
06-13-2006, 09:57
Interesting article. Don't get me wrong, I love my little M-1, but the author needs put away the crack pipe.

The M-1s were not terribly accurate, not terribly reliable and their reputation for poor knock down started in WWII, not Korea, which was well deserved. As far as more knock down than a 30-06????? :shocked: Car bodies? :shocked:

The guys in Vietnam hated them. They could not penetrate even the lightest of foilage, let alone a hooch.

Oh well, too much crap, too little time.

LSP972
06-14-2006, 07:32
Originally posted by Yamadad
The M-1s were not terribly accurate, not terribly reliable and their reputation for poor knock down started in WWII, not Korea, which was well deserved.

That seems to be the "conventional wisdom" among gun enthusiasts WHO WERE NOT THERE.

I have spoken to three WW II combat vets (two from the Pacific, one from Europe) who praised the little rifle's effectiveness against enemy troops. One was my uncle; I have seen his 201 file, so I know he did indeed make almost every island campaign from Guadalcanal to Iwo Jima. He finally took a real bad hit on Iwo and was sent home. His exact words regarding the M1 carbine... "That was a Jap-killin' little s.o.b."...

You hear the same rant regarding the M-16's ineffectiveness from "cognescenti"... while the "new" SS109 ammuntion may indeed be a poor performer, the old M193 certainly did the job for us 35 years ago.

And I am reminded of Clint Smith's comment regarding the rifle/cartridge combo... "Thousands of dead German and Japanese soldiers can't ALL be wrong!"

So, I guess it depends upon one's perspective, eh?:upeyes:

Kentuckian
06-16-2006, 18:30
I can't speak to their knockdown power, but mine is accurate and reliable.

Faulkner
06-17-2006, 16:49
Originally posted by LSP972
That seems to be the "conventional wisdom" among gun enthusiasts WHO WERE NOT THERE.

I have spoken to three WW II combat vets (two from the Pacific, one from Europe) who praised the little rifle's effectiveness against enemy troops. One was my uncle; I have seen his 201 file, so I know he did indeed make almost every island campaign from Guadalcanal to Iwo Jima. He finally took a real bad hit on Iwo and was sent home. His exact words regarding the M1 carbine... "That was a Jap-killin' little s.o.b."...

You hear the same rant regarding the M-16's ineffectiveness from "cognescenti"... while the "new" SS109 ammuntion may indeed be a poor performer, the old M193 certainly did the job for us 35 years ago.

And I am reminded of Clint Smith's comment regarding the rifle/cartridge combo... "Thousands of dead German and Japanese soldiers can't ALL be wrong!"

So, I guess it depends upon one's perspective, eh?:upeyes:

Couldn't agree more. I've been carrying a carbine in M1A1 configuration for a number of years. I qualify with it semi-annually and it's reliable, plenty accurate, and with round-nosed-soft-points or soft-nosed-hollow-points it'll take care of business.

I've shot FMJ's and soft nosed ammo through auto bodies and auto glass and I wouldn't want to be on the inside of the car being shot at by one.

No, it's not a .308 or 30-06, but it's a darn sight better than any handgun or pistol caliber carbine.

http://pic13.picturetrail.com/VOL488/1124764/4557860/99295973.jpg

Rick O'Shay
06-17-2006, 19:29
My dad mounted a scope on an M1 carbine, and used soft-nose rounds, for deer hunting. He averaged about 8 deer per year, for about 30 years. He NEVER fired the carbine without dropping the deer. Knock down power also depends on AIM. ;)

If you study the ballistics, you have to be impressed with this rifle out to 150 yards or so. In the hands of an expert, even farther.

G26man
06-18-2006, 18:35
One thing I will say the author was way off on was the price. There is no way you can buy 2 or 3 real M1 Carbines for the price of an AR around here. At least none that would be worth having. You can pick up a NIB entry level AR for $700, and a new M1 Carbine from Auto Ordnance is over $500 (MSRP of $674 and that is with the cheaper birch stock). A used GI model is more than that and a used commercial with real GI parts is not much less. The commericals with non-GI parts are not even real M1 carbines IMO and are excluded off hand.

LSP972
06-19-2006, 06:45
Originally posted by G26man
One thing I will say the author was way off on was the price. .

Unfortunately, you are 100% correct. I want one; but not bad enough to pay a grand or better... :sad:

Kentuckian
06-20-2006, 04:54
Originally posted by G26man
The commericals with non-GI parts are not even real M1 carbines IMO and are excluded off hand.

Mine was made by National Ordnance sometime in the '60s.

Not a GI, but good quality, reliable, and accurate.

IMO, if you dismiss commercial M1 Carbines out of hand, the loss is yours......though I suppose snob appeal does enter into many people's buying decisions.

LSP972
06-20-2006, 07:25
Originally posted by Kentuckian
IMO, if you dismiss commercial M1 Carbines out of hand, the loss is yours......

Quite possibly. But then, one is confronted with which non-GI rifles to avoid.

As long as I've been around guns, reading about them, teaching their use, working on them, I still wouldn't be certain about a non-GI carbine. I know to avoid anything by Universal; I've been told that certain Iver Johnsons are junk. And I have been told, by people whose opinions I trust, that most National Ordnance offerings are less than good.

So who is one to believe? I have no reason to doubt your word, Kentuckian; yet, my other source has always been spot-on. I don't think his attitude is due to that snob appeal you mentioned; this guy is a use-whatever-works-best type of individual.

Not trying to bust your chops here; just trying to make a point. Which is... in most circumstances (to me, anyway), buying genuine GI is a safe bet, in that you at least know the thing had to pass a QC inspector with no axe to grind.

I still want one of these neat little rifles. When I retire and am flush with all that excess accumulated leave cash, I just might spend a ridiculous amount of money on a pristine GI carbine. I'm going to spend it on SOMETHING; either this, or my other hobby.

In the meantime, I'm still looking and learning...

.

G26man
06-20-2006, 07:25
Originally posted by Kentuckian
Mine was made by National Ordnance sometime in the '60s.

Not a GI, but good quality, reliable, and accurate.

IMO, if you dismiss commercial M1 Carbines out of hand, the loss is yours......though I suppose snob appeal does enter into many people's buying decisions.
I'm not dismissing commercials at all, read my post again. What I am dismissing is commercials made with unique, non-GI parts as in a Universal, for instance. The Universal did not have the same mechanical design so you could not use standard (GI) parts if something broke. The dual recoil spring setup was very difficult to reassemble too. I had one, it was fun to shoot but it was a different design and not the real M1 Carbine the above article was written about. I would like to buy a Carbine and I have no use for snob appeal. What I would most likely go for is a mil-spec commercial like the Auto Ordnance or a GI mixmaster.

Slightly unrelated to this discussion, but thats my personal preference about all mil-surp weapons. I want what a soldier of the period would recognize and be prefectly at home with. That way when I hold it, shoot it, and clean it I know I'm getting the same experience as the ones who used them in battle and that historical value is what matters to me, who cares if the serial numbers don't match and its not worth a gazilion dollars?

Yamadad
06-22-2006, 12:06
I have an original GI Inland rifle and LOVE it. I wasn't trying to bust the carbine's chops (to quote), but you have to be realistic. This is how I see the M-1, pluses and minuses:

The carbine inaccuracy mostly stemmed from poor sights, because they were designed for close in work only, not distance. Remember it was a sustitute for a pistol.

Would the .30 carbine round kill? Of course, but is it ideal for combat issue? No. I've talked to combat veterans from WWII, Korea, and Vietnam who had mixed opinions about the carbine. It's all anecdotal, not scientific. However, from a ballistic standpoint the carbine round is rather weak, more akin to a pistol cartridge, which is what is was designed to duplicate. Unfortunately the idea that it was to replace a service pistol and substitute a rifle was a little flawed. A pistol is a pistol and a rifle is a rifle. Now if they had given the round a little more umph, it would have been ideal.

As to the reliability. It was okay, but they could be picky. The thing I see is that no one seems to be able to build a reliable one today. The Universals were supposed to be designed to correct "flaws" in the original, but they were total crap. Everyone else who tried seems to have mixed results at best. It seems to me that if the design (which in theory I like better than the Garand) was so good Ruger would have used it in the Minis rather than the Garand (aside from that Gawd-awful safety).

To my way of thinking, if you combine the two M-1s into a single design, it would have made a perfect battle field impliment for the time.

Kentuckian
06-26-2006, 05:11
Originally posted by LSP972
So who is one to believe?

I think people tend to believe that which most closely reflects their own views and/or bias.

Basic human nature, IMO.

Rusty Shackleford
06-27-2006, 07:33
Can anyone tell me who makes a current m1 or m1a1 model these days? I have my C&R license but for my purposes would rather have something new and haven't had much luck with google, etc.

Thx in advance

Critias
06-27-2006, 08:08
Originally posted by Rusty Shackleford
Can anyone tell me who makes a current m1 or m1a1 model these days? I have my C&R license but for my purposes would rather have something new and haven't had much luck with google, etc.

Thx in advance Springfield Armory does, I think.

Rusty Shackleford
06-27-2006, 09:14
That was my first guess, but it doesn't look like SA has em anymore.

Remander
06-27-2006, 22:22
Can anyone tell me who makes a current m1 or m1a1 model these days?

If you are talking about the M1 Carbine:

http://www.auto-ordnance.com/images/aom130.jpg

Auto Ordnance, as someone mentioned above, is making these now.

Here is a link. (http://www.auto-ordnance.com/ao_aom110.html)

Rusty Shackleford
06-30-2006, 13:02
Thanks, Remander. I stopped reading about one post short of where it was already mentioned. :innocent:

Sponsored Links:
High-Quality First Responder Kit
Buy high-quality emergency medical equipment supplies and products.
High-Quality Spotting Scopes
Optics Plus offers of night vision binoculars, spotting scopes, military goggles and more. Hacker safe Web site. Online orders receive free shipping. Military and law enforcement discounts.
Buy Night Vision Scopes
Up to 50% OFF & Free UPS Full Warranty, Auth. Dealer.
Get Top Notch Tactical Training
Our students improve significantly - you can go to the range forever or spend 4 days at our resort. Our purpose is YOUR competence. Find out more with 15 Free Gun Training Reports and a DVD.
Blackhawks Jersey
Great Deals on all Blackhawks Jerseys. Shop Now - Official NHL Shop.
GSA Emergency Paging
GSA Authorized Emergency Paging Wireless System. Military uses.
Buy Military Surplus
Low Prices on Military Surplus. 110% Satisfaction Guarantee.
Military Surplus Vehicles
Find military equip. & supplies. Your business solution Business.com.
Night Vision - 30% off Sale
Top Rated Night Vision Site. Low Prices, 30% Off, Fast Shipping.
Spotting Scope
Bushnell, Leupold, Nikon, tasco 4,000+ Different Products in-stock.
Blackhawk Tactical Products
Free Shipping from Select Stores this Holiday Season at SHOP.COM!
Kid Night Vision
Find kid night vision at Target. Shop Target.com.
Bar Lights & Signs
Unique and fun bar lights & signs.Kotulas: Free shipping-no minimum.
Clearance Sale: Up to 84% Off.Today
Military survival gear Clearance Sale. Up to 84% off Today. Online and Toll Free 1-888-228-6694 Same Day & Express Shipping. Online military survival gear Leaders Since 1993 - See Why Here.
Cheap Night Vision
Save huge on cheap night vision. eBay! It's where you go to save.
Special Forces Watch
30,000+ Special Forces WatchesShop, Compare and Save at Pronto.
Surplus Military
Bid on Surplus Military now! Find Militaria.
Special Forces Stuff
Buy Special Forces clothing, gear & gifts. 1000+ unique designs.
Leica Optics; Ships Free
German Binoculars, Scopes & more. Ira Wood est. 1918. Same day ship.
[+] Desert Tactical [+]
BlackHawk Tactical gear at Low Prices! Save 10% on your First Order.
Meade Spotting Scopes
Meade blow-out sale. Great prices & Free shipping.
Cheap Night Vision
Night Vision Systems On Sale Now. Free Shipping. Order Securely Now.
Night Vision Binoculars
Millions of Products. Read Reviews. Night Vision Binoculars: Prices.
US Army Special Forces
Explore A Special Forces Career Free Information, No Bull, No Bias.
Edgewater Power Boats
Custom fiberglass boats 14' to 38' for commercial, military, fire & law enforcement applications.
Army Navy Surplus
20,000+ Army Navy Surplus Products Shop, Compare and Save at Pronto.
Military Equipment Providers
Find military equip. & supplies. Your business solution Business.com.
Cheap Night Vision
10,000+ Choices for the Outdoors. Deals On cheap night Vision.
Save on Military Clothing
Get great prices on genuine military clothing in all sizes and colors.
Special Forces "Q" Course Certificate
Special Forces Qualification Course - Both Regular Army and Non resident certificates are available. Check out all our Special Training Certificates.
Mil-Spec Coatings