View Full Version : Jodie Foster movie upcoming; the brave one
johnydoe
08-25-2007, 13:07
for CCWs.
http://www.apple.com/trailers/wb/thebraveone/trailer1/
sounds good but will it have a stupid ending that pushes the left's agenda?
rvrctyrngr
08-25-2007, 16:31
Well, it IS set in NYC!
Dandapani
08-25-2007, 19:06
Not CCW, vigilante!
SilentGLOCK
08-25-2007, 19:09
It's Jody Foster's take on the classic Death Wish. Jody Foster is one of the most anti-gun/anti-ccw/anti-self-defense bastards in Hollywood. BOYCOTT HER CRAP.
“Isn’t it possible that we all have that bit of insanity in us? That’s why I’m for gun control. Absolutely. I don’t believe that people should have access to life-or-death situations at any emotional time in their life. I don’t really believe that a human being who feels [things] should have the option at their fingertips.”
Jodie Foster
Armed Infidel
08-25-2007, 19:20
I guess that means Jody's morals can be bought? Doesn't that make her a... ah, never mind! :animlol:
Usingmyrights
08-25-2007, 20:44
Looked like it could be an interesting movie. Of course a Hollywood would never actually put out a true "gun movie".
Seamus O'Connor
08-25-2007, 21:37
Originally posted by SilentGLOCK
It's Jody Foster's take on the classic Death Wish. Jody Foster is one of the most anti-gun/anti-ccw/anti-self-defense bastards in Hollywood. BOYCOTT HER CRAP.
“Isn’t it possible that we all have that bit of insanity in us? That’s why I’m for gun control. Absolutely. I don’t believe that people should have access to life-or-death situations at any emotional time in their life. I don’t really believe that a human being who feels [things] should have the option at their fingertips.”
Jodie Foster
Darn!!! This looked promising from the clips. Interesting that Hollywierd builds the previews to seemingly appeal to pro-gun types, while making the actual movie propagate anti-gun sentiments. Advertising is always produced to appeal to the largest group it can. In other words, if there were more of them (anit-gun) than us (pro-gun) out there, the previews would have been 180° different. We are still the majority.
BTW, Jody Foster is still really good to look at ;). But then again, so is Angelina Jolie and look how ridiculous she is. :upeyes:
Seamus O'Connor
08-25-2007, 21:37
Originally posted by Usingmyrights
Looked like it could be an interesting movie. Of course a Hollywood would never actually put out a true "gun movie".
+1 Not anymore.
mr00jimbo
08-25-2007, 21:41
This seems to be a movie about the debate around CCW. Since she can't CCW legally in NY she was still carrying and fired in self-defense and is about how people can stand up to attackers and criminals but might be legally scrutinized for it
Thoughts?
It's the product of a notoriously anti-gun Hollywood. What do we expect???
digitspaw
08-25-2007, 22:09
Originally posted by Deckard
It's the product of a notoriously anti-gun Hollywood. What do we expect???
Not necessarily. In her case, I imagine that she could finance it or get it done and direct it herself. She is pretty conservative and smart as hell. Sent herself to Yale after being a child star. I could hang with her.
I would like to hear more info on this movie. I could see her MAYBE taking the gig for the work, but she probably doesn't need it and can pick her pet projects.
It might be a good thing for the cause. Who knows.
Paw:wavey:
NeverMore1701
08-25-2007, 23:40
Looking forward to it. Made my usual "if the dingbat woulda had a gun, might have turned out differently" comment during the first scene of the trailer. Got a pleasant surprise during the rest of it.
Could be good.
NeverMore1701
08-25-2007, 23:44
Gonna see it. Trailer looks promising, and I can take away from it whatever I want.
The movie will be out September 15...
TMann
Andrewsky
08-25-2007, 23:56
From Wikipedia:
"After her fiance David (Naveen Andrews) is murdered, Erica Bain (Jodie Foster) starts a relentless hunt for the possible suspects. While being pursued by Det. Mercer (Terrence Howard), she starts to display charcteristics of what she is trying to stop."
:upeyes:
Don't get your hopes up.
michael t
08-26-2007, 00:02
Female Death Wish . I think thats the name of the movies made in 70's with I don't remember his name now. From previews looks very similer
Originally posted by michael t
Female Death Wish . I think thats the name of the movies made in 70's with I don't remember his name now. From previews looks very similer
Charles Bronson
Forgetting that name is like forgetting Clint, John or Chuck ;)
Originally posted by michael t
Female Death Wish . I think thats the name of the movies made in 70's with I don't remember his name now. From previews looks very similer
Shame, shame, :toilet: :supergrin:
mr00jimbo
08-26-2007, 11:56
Originally posted by Andrewsky
From Wikipedia:
"After her fiance David (Naveen Andrews) is murdered, Erica Bain (Jodie Foster) starts a relentless hunt for the possible suspects. While being pursued by Det. Mercer (Terrence Howard), she starts to display charcteristics of what she is trying to stop."
:upeyes:
Don't get your hopes up.
Oh damn. From the previews they made it look like somebody who was rightfully defending themselves and exposing the flaws in the judicial system denying her the legal rights to do so.
Gary1911A1
08-26-2007, 12:21
Charles Bronson signed my FL. CCW Permit.:)
AlphaTea
08-26-2007, 12:52
Originally posted by Gary1911A1
Charles Bronson signed my FL. CCW Permit.:)
Charles H. Bronson signed mine too!
I thought it was a joke until I looked it up on the net.
That does have a certain coolness factor to it.
SilentGLOCK
08-26-2007, 13:47
It's Jody Foster's take on the classic Death Wish. Jody Foster is one of the most anti-gun/anti-ccw/anti-self-defense bastards in Hollywood. BOYCOTT HER CRAP.
“Isn’t it possible that we all have that bit of insanity in us? That’s why I’m for gun control. Absolutely. I don’t believe that people should have access to life-or-death situations at any emotional time in their life. I don’t really believe that a human being who feels [things] should have the option at their fingertips.”
Jodie Foster
USDefender
08-26-2007, 14:32
Originally posted by michael t
Female Death Wish .
That was my exact first thought when I saw the first commercial. My second thought was: "Yaaaaawwwwwnnnnnn".http://www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/schlafen/sleeping-smiley-015.gif
Think I'll skip Hollywood's take on CCW and self-defense.
NYC Drew
08-26-2007, 14:58
Originally posted by SilentGLOCK
It's Jody Foster's take on the classic Death Wish. Jody Foster is one of the most anti-gun/anti-ccw/anti-self-defense bastards in Hollywood. BOYCOTT HER CRAP.
...
Do you have a link to that quote?
And why is the opinion of someone whose job is all about make believe important to any of us?
Believe me, I work, have worked with music/hollywood types, and outside of the information I need to get my job done, who the hell cares what they think?
(until they start running for office?)
'Drew
Originally posted by NYC Drew
And why is the opinion of someone whose job is all about make believe important to any of us?
'Drew
EXACTLY!
I mean, these were the kids that were in Drama Club!!!
:rofl:
Elmer Fudd
08-26-2007, 16:01
Originally posted by NYC Drew
Do you have a link to that quote?
And why is the opinion of someone whose job is all about make believe important to any of us?
Believe me, I work, have worked with music/hollywood types, and outside of the information I need to get my job done, who the hell cares what they think?
(until they start running for office?)
'Drew
These people shape the opinions of the sheep around us. They make up a significant portion of the 50.1% that can take away your rights. You'd better care what they think.
Hard to believe someone from the media and advertising center of the world could made a comment like that.
DJTHEMAC
08-26-2007, 17:56
I cringed when i saw the preview. Its gonna get ugly.
Deradius
08-26-2007, 18:22
The previews make the film look like a very clever attempt to subtly equate the average CCW'er with a vigilante.
They seem to suggest that she has a legitimate concern for her safety, begins concealing a weapon and then places herself in a variety of vulnerable situations that allow her to retaliate with deadly force. Upon doing so, she appears (against all available evidence suggesting that reality demonstrates the opposite extreme) to enjoy the armed encounters and the damage she causes.
It looks like it could be a warped and artificial insight into the CCW mentality with a cleverly disguised homocidal sociopath at its center.
I hope the previews are distorted, and the actual film proves me wrong.
Originally posted by Deradius
The previews make the film look like a very clever attempt to subtly equate the average CCW'er with a vigilante.
I agree.
SilentGLOCK
08-26-2007, 18:31
And why is the opinion of someone whose job is all about make believe important to any of us?
Funny how you claim to work with these people and don't seem to realize that Hollywood Movie & TV Stars are NOT ONLY FAMOUS, THEY ARE VERY WEALTHY and COMMAND a VERY LARGE AUDIENCE.
Let's use Rosie O'Donnel as an example: She has/had an audience of MILLIONS of people everyday on her TV shows and her magazines - and all of the cable shows run her filth & lies to millions more. Jodie Foster is not as powerful as Rosie, but she still has influence. ESPECIALLY in our ELECTIONS! WHO DO YOU THINK IS GIVING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO HILLARY & OBAMA & other Leftist Politicians????? Answer: The same pathetic Leftist Hollywood bastards like Oprah, Rosie, Damon, Afleck and Baldwin.
We can further explore the Rosie example by discussing her famous interview with Tom Selleck. Selleck is progun and NRA Director - Rosie is just an anti-gun POS who happens to talk to the same millions of people everyday. Who had the greater influence??? Rosie or Tom (with his 10 minutes on TV)
Jodie Foster is nothing more than a major HYPOCRITE. She doesn't believe in the 2nd Amendment or Your Right To Self-Defense. I haven't seen her latest movie, but I'll bet my Glock that there are plenty of Anti-gun messages contained within. The Quote above comes from an interview:
http://www.more.com/more/story.jsp?storyid=/templatedata/more/story/data/1186164961272.xml
Q: In an essay you once wrote for Esquire, you tried to get inside Hinckley's head.
A: "Clearly, there are themes that overlap, and with Taxi Driver as well. You know, the division between sanity and insanity is so arbitrary. Isn't it possible that we all have that bit of insanity in us? That's why I'm for gun control. Absolutely. Hunting, I get that -- let's protect hunting. But I don't believe that people should have access to life-or-death situations at any emotional time in their life. I don't really believe that a human being who feels [things] should have the option at their fingertips to use this many calories. [Mimes pulling a trigger]"
After reading Foster's statement, be sure to read:
http://www.jpfo.org/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm
Ranger.357
08-26-2007, 19:01
That's why I'm for gun control too Jodie...Firm grip, Steady Aim, Deadly Accurate. If someone killed my spouse and the law couldn't or wouldn't bring them in you'd better believe I'd be out lookin too!
lakota222
08-26-2007, 20:27
:puking:
Enough said.
Ranger.357
08-26-2007, 20:49
For what's it's worth.........I got this as an email from a friend of mine.
How long do we have?
This is the most interesting thing I've read in a long time. The sad thing about it...you can see it coming.
I have heard about this "democracy countdown" for some time. It is interesting to see it in print. God help us, not that we deserve it, especially if we sit by and let it happen.
How Long Do We Have?
About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at
the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:
"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government."
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."
"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years"
"During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:
1. from bondage to spiritual faith;
2. from spiritual faith to great courage;
3. from courage to liberty;
4. from liberty to abundance;
5. from abundance to complacency;
6. from complacency to apathy;
7. from apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage"
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:
Number of States won by:
Gore: 19
Bush: 29
Square miles of land won by:
Gore: 580,000
Bush: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:
Gore: 127 million
Bush: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Gore: 13.2
Bush: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of
democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called "illegal" and they get to vote, then we may say
goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.
If you are in favor of this happening then delete this message; if you are not then Pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
You might want to take the time and drop a note to your congressman and senators for both state and federal governments. Let them know you are not "asleep at the wheel" and that you certainly hope they aren't either.
The trailers that are starting to pop up on TV show her to be using a Kahr K9 as her weapon of choice.
In the Death Wish movie from the '70's, Charles Bronson's character was using a small .32 revolver that was given to him as a gift from a Texas businessman.
I got curious after reading this thread and did an internet search to find:
Jodie Foster quote featured on the Brady page (http://bradycampaign.org/media/release.php?release=917)
Not going to waste any hard-earned $ on this movie.
cjlandry
08-26-2007, 22:44
Originally posted by Ranger.357
For what's it's worth.........I got this as an email from a friend of mine.
How long do we have?
This is the most interesting thing I've read in a long time. The sad thing about it...you can see it coming.
I have heard about this "democracy countdown" for some time. It is interesting to see it in print. God help us, not that we deserve it, especially if we sit by and let it happen.
How Long Do We Have?
About the time our original thirteen states adopted their new constitution in 1787, Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at
the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years earlier:
"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government."
"A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury."
"From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship."
"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years"
"During those 200 years, those nations always progressed through the following sequence:
1. from bondage to spiritual faith;
2. from spiritual faith to great courage;
3. from courage to liberty;
4. from liberty to abundance;
5. from abundance to complacency;
6. from complacency to apathy;
7. from apathy to dependence;
8. From dependence back into bondage"
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the 2000 Presidential election:
Number of States won by:
Gore: 19
Bush: 29
Square miles of land won by:
Gore: 580,000
Bush: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:
Gore: 127 million
Bush: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Gore: 13.2
Bush: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Bush won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of this great country. Gore's territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..."
Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of
democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called "illegal" and they get to vote, then we may say
goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.
If you are in favor of this happening then delete this message; if you are not then Pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that apathy is the greatest danger to our freedom.
You might want to take the time and drop a note to your congressman and senators for both state and federal governments. Let them know you are not "asleep at the wheel" and that you certainly hope they aren't either.
"panem et circenses"
We are definitely the most well fed and constantly entertained society in history.
When attempting to compare to Rome remember that the government was funding and organizing the entertainment.
Here and now it is not the same.
Ranger.357
08-26-2007, 22:50
I'm not sure, but I think that was the point...a lot of people in the U.S. are.
cjlandry
08-26-2007, 22:53
Originally posted by Warp
When attempting to compare to Rome remember that the government was funding and organizing the entertainment.
Here and now it is not the same... ...yet.
It's getting closer every day.
Andrewsky
08-26-2007, 23:15
Originally posted by cjlandry
...yet.
It's getting closer every day.
In Mesa, AZ, there was a vote a year or two back concerning the first property tax ever in the city of Mesa. The problem was that funding was needed to keep an art museum and a theater in operation.
They couldn't just charge entrance fees.:upeyes:
dawgslappa
08-27-2007, 00:18
Originally posted by SilentGLOCK
It's Jody Foster's take on the classic Death Wish. Jody Foster is one of the most anti-gun/anti-ccw/anti-self-defense bastards in Hollywood. BOYCOTT HER CRAP.
“Isn’t it possible that we all have that bit of insanity in us? That’s why I’m for gun control. Absolutely. I don’t believe that people should have access to life-or-death situations at any emotional time in their life. I don’t really believe that a human being who feels [things] should have the option at their fingertips.”
Jodie Foster Better not let people drive cars at emotional times in their lives.
lakota222
08-27-2007, 06:07
Originally posted by Andrewsky
In Mesa, AZ, there was a vote a year or two back concerning the first property tax ever in the city of Mesa. The problem was that funding was needed to keep an art museum and a theater in operation.
They couldn't just charge entrance fees.:upeyes:
Now there is a concept! Charge the people who actually use it instead of forcing everyone to fund it.
Wiskey_33
08-27-2007, 07:51
The preview I saw on TV was different than the one on the apple website...looks pretty lame after seeing the whole thing...."I want my dog back."
HerrGlock
08-27-2007, 07:52
Originally posted by dmobrien2001
Not CCW, vigilante!
According to the movie it seems they're the same thing.
The Tyler email is a spoof.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/tyler.asp
Merged the two threads on same subject.
Ranger.357
08-27-2007, 20:21
.
Creeper1313
08-27-2007, 20:35
Originally posted by michael t
Female Death Wish . I think thats the name of the movies made in 70's with I don't remember his name now. From previews looks very similer
Say what you will about Jodie Foster... she's cuter than Charles Bronson, and MUCH cuter than Bernie Goetz. Her politics don't change the fact that "Silence of the Lambs" is among my favorite movies (and she knew how to handle a gun in that one too).
Originally posted by SilentGLOCK
http://www.jpfo.org/ragingagainstselfdefense.htm
Thanks for the link ... It was very interesting reading.
Why are there two "remakes" of "Death Wish" coming out at the same time?
Kevin Bacon is in a movie called "Death Sentence" that he said is modeled after "Death Wish."
Wake_jumper
08-28-2007, 11:46
LOL! Now that's a good trailer! If she is so rabidly anti gun... why would she agree to make such a movie? Perhaps she is not so anti now that she's "lived" the life of a "vigilante". She was interviewed recently about the film and here is what she had to say:
(the whole interview is here: http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117970406.html?categoryid=2508&cs=1 )
"Playing this character felt good," Foster says.
"There's something gratifying about holding a 9 millimeter in your pocket," she admits, "to have the power to know that with less calories than it takes to put a candy in your mouth, you can make a decision that says, 'I live, you die.' "
But, Foster insists, she does not act like other cinema action icons. "When she approaches the guy with a crowbar, she doesn't say, 'Listen mother****er I'm going to take you down,' " says Foster. "She says, " 'Why do you think you can hurt people? You think you can just hurt people and walk away?' That to me is so compelling. She does say, 'I want my dog back.' But throughout the movie there is such pain and longing and weakness and shame. It's a mixture of strength and so many huge vulnerable emotions. It's not the toughness or the strength that makes it work, it's the other stuff."
The movie is subversive, Foster says. "That is its strength. It will ask people to head down into a very shameful place. Some people will embrace that and feel empowered by it. And some will resent it. Some people will root for that revenge because they're with the character. But it doesn't mean she's not wrong."
Originally posted by Wake_jumper
LOL! Now that's a good trailer! If she is so rabidly anti gun... why would she agree to make such a movie?
Because the overall message is anti....
Originally posted by Wake_jumper
"There's something gratifying about holding a 9 millimeter in your pocket," she admits, "to have the power to know that with less calories than it takes to put a candy in your mouth, you can make a decision that says, 'I live, you die.' "
And that sounds a HELLUVA lot like her quote posted previously in this thread.
Originally posted by Foster
That's why I'm for gun control. Absolutely. Hunting, I get that -- let's protect hunting. But I don't believe that people should have access to life-or-death situations at any emotional time in their life.
Fred Hansen
08-28-2007, 12:17
Looks to me like the typical leftist HollyPerv bilge.
That is to say that the moment a person picks up a gun they become an out-of-control killer bent on revenge.
No thanks. Y'all could save your 11/2-2 hours and simply send the ticket fee directly to the Brady Campaign et al.
That's where at least part of your money will go after you give it to Ms. Foster.
:upeyes:
Wake_jumper
08-28-2007, 12:29
Originally posted by Warp
Because the overall message is anti....
And that sounds a HELLUVA lot like her quote posted previously in this thread.
I didn't think the movie had been released yet. How did you get a chance to see it?
I don't agree... if someone says: [by carrying a gun], "...you can make a decision that says, 'I live, you die.' “I think they are talking about self defense and the fundamental reason to carry. When she said she didn't think someone should have access to firearms when they are overly emotional, I think she was thinking about emotional instability i.e. John Hinckley, Jr. And why wouldn't she be a supporter of Brady... after all she is the reason that Hinckley shot Reagan and Brady! I would hate to have that on my mind.
WJ.
Originally posted by Wake_jumper
And why wouldn't she be a supporter of Brady... after all she is the reason that Hinckley shot Reagan and Brady! I would hate to have that on my mind.
Say what?
Wake_jumper
08-28-2007, 13:20
Originally posted by Warp
Say what?
From Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hinckley,_Jr.
Obsession with Jodie Foster
After repeated viewings of the 1976 movie Taxi Driver, in which a disturbed protagonist, Travis Bickle, played by Robert DeNiro, plots to assassinate a presidential candidate, Hinckley developed an obsession with actress Jodie Foster, who played a child prostitute in the film[2]. When Foster entered Yale University, Hinckley moved to New Haven, Connecticut, for a short time to be nearer to her, slipping poems and messages under her door and repeatedly contacting her by telephone.
Failing to develop any meaningful contact with Foster, Hinckley developed such plots as hijacking an airplane and committing suicide in front of her to gain her attention. Eventually he settled on a scheme to win her over by assassinating the president, with the theory that as a historical figure, he would be her equal. To this end, he trailed Jimmy Carter, then president, from state to state, but was arrested in Nashville, Tennessee on a firearms charge. Penniless, he returned home once again, and despite psychiatric treatment for depression, his mental health did not improve. In 1981, he began to target the newly elected president, Ronald Reagan. It was also at this time that he started collecting information on Lee Harvey Oswald, John F Kennedy's assassin, whom he saw as a role model.
Just prior to Hinckley's failed attempt on Reagan's life, he wrote to Foster[3]:
Over the past seven months I've left you dozens of poems, letters and love messages in the faint hope that you could develop an interest in me. Although we talked on the phone a couple of times I never had the nerve to simply approach you and introduce myself. [...] the reason I'm going ahead with this attempt now is because I cannot wait any longer to impress you.
Oh yeah, I forgot all about that.
Crazy
johnydoe
08-30-2007, 12:54
In the subway scene, there's a "click" safety sound then the gun goes bang. I thought Kahr pistols didn't have manual safety like Glock?
Originally posted by johnydoe
In the subway scene, there's a "click" safety sound then the gun goes bang. I thought Kahr pistols didn't have manual safety like Glock?
Finding mistakes hollywood makes, especially regarding guns, is far too easy. The either don't know anything at all about the way things work in real life, ignore they way it works in real life to make the movie better, or lie in order to further their agenda. Which one just depends on the individual situation at hand.
In this case they probably wanted the "click" in the movie and don't care that a Kahr doesn't have a manual, external safety.
How many times do you hear a "chick" sound when somebody merely brings a gun up and points it? Revolvers included? :upeyes:
Originally posted by Warp
Finding mistakes hollywood makes, especially regarding guns, is far too easy. The either don't know anything at all about the way things work in real life, ignore they way it works in real life to make the movie better, or lie in order to further their agenda. Which one just depends on the individual situation at hand.
In this case they probably wanted the "click" in the movie and don't care that a Kahr doesn't have a manual, external safety.
How many times do you hear a "chick" sound when somebody merely brings a gun up and points it? Revolvers included? :upeyes:
they could just switch guns in the middle of a scene and hope no one notices like in bourne ultimatum. he turns a glock into a sig as he is holding it to the evil doctors head.
hollywood sucks.
cjlandry
08-30-2007, 21:41
Originally posted by Dinho
they could just switch guns in the middle of a scene and hope no one notices like in bourne ultimatum. he turns a glock into a sig as he is holding it to the evil doctors head.
hollywood sucks.
I seldom watch TV, and I may go to the movies twice a year. An occasional flick on one of the movie channels, and a DVD on my laptop every once in a while.
When I watch a movie, I put myself in a different frame of mind, where I don't have to pick apart every little sound effect and visual flaw.
I paid for entertainment. I prefer not to ruin it for myself.
Originally posted by Dinho
they could just switch guns in the middle of a scene and hope no one notices like in bourne ultimatum. he turns a glock into a sig as he is holding it to the evil doctors head.
hollywood sucks.
actually he was using the glock to cap the guy in the flashback, the sig was in the present. the bourne series was much better about stuff like that than the usual hollywood crap.
Patronus
09-03-2007, 09:23
Originally posted by digitspaw
Not necessarily. In her case, I imagine that she could finance it or get it done and direct it herself. She is pretty conservative and smart as hell. Sent herself to Yale after being a child star. I could hang with her.
I would like to hear more info on this movie. I could see her MAYBE taking the gig for the work, but she probably doesn't need it and can pick her pet projects.
It might be a good thing for the cause. Who knows.
You're right -- who knows? The trailer doesn't make it look promising, though, and the whole CCW=vigilante angle is not heartening. If she just goes after people and does another Death Wish, fine; if she obtains a carry permit in the movie, that'll be really stupid.
Sure, she's smart....but CONSERVATIVE? Well, based on the two quotes shared in this thread--one about gun control, the other about her role in this movie--I don't care how conservative she is on some issues, because on the Second Amendment she's DEAD WRONG. The fact that she's smart just makes her a more venerable opponent to the 2A.
As for the entertainment factor, that's fine and dandy. Allow yourself to be entertained. But there are plenty of people who will see something on the silver screen and think it's absolute truth, and that's where ignorance loses its bliss.
As for whether this movie will cause an uproar against CCW...
:popcorn:
Patronus
09-03-2007, 09:26
Originally posted by Patronus
You're right -- who knows? The trailer doesn't make it look promising, though, and the whole CCW=vigilante angle is not heartening. If she just goes after people and does another Death Wish, fine; if she obtains a carry permit in the movie, that'll be really stupid.
Sure, she's smart....but CONSERVATIVE? Well, based on the two quotes shared in this thread--one about gun control, the other about her role in this movie--I don't care how conservative she is on some issues, because on the Second Amendment she's DEAD WRONG. The fact that she's smart just makes her a more venerable opponent to the 2A.
As for the entertainment factor, that's fine and dandy. Allow yourself to be entertained. But there are plenty of people who will see something on the silver screen and think it's absolute truth and base their opinions by it, and that's where ignorance loses its bliss. Ask any anti what they thought about Bowling for Columbine...
As for whether this movie will cause an uproar against CCW...
:popcorn:
WHOOPS. I meant to just edit my original post. Oh, well.
one flick that is great is Man on Fire.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.