PDA

View Full Version : Citi Bank to CDNN - No more firearms...


Sarge45
01-31-2008, 17:43
Looks like Citi is unfriendly to our friends at CDNN...

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59970

WEAPONS OF CHOICE
Credit card company: No more buying guns
Foundation says ban impacts weapons for citizens, military, law enforcement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: January 31, 2008
1:00 a.m. Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com

A major credit card company has issued a letter to a gun dealer canceling his payment processing services because of corporate concerns firearms were being sold to consumers in other states, in "a non face-to-face environment." Now the move has raised the ire of the National Shooting Sports Foundation.

"Your anti-gun corporate policy is based on ignorance of the law applicable to the sale of firearms," the NSSF wrote in response to the action taken by First Data Corp., which operates Citi Merchant Services.

"It is perfectly legal, in fact commonplace, for a federal firearms licensee in one state to sell a firearm to a non-licensee (consumer) from another state," the foundation continued. "What you fail to appreciate is that the firearm is not shipped in interstate commerce directly to the consumer. Rather, as required by federal law, the firearm is shipped by the selling licensee to another federal firearms licensee in the state of residence of the consumer … The consumer acquires the firearm from that licensed dealer in a face-to-face transaction…."

The issue arose when Citi Merchant Services, in a letter signed by June Rivera-Mantilla in the "Periodic Review" department, informed CDNN Sports In. of Abilene, Texas, that the company's bankcard processing services were cancelled, and that the banking company was withholding $75,000 as a reserve for "potential chargebacks" and it would be held for six months or longer.

Officials with CDNN declined to discuss the situation with WND, citing the "litigation" that was ongoing over the dispute. But they confirmed that the letter documenting the actions by Citi Merchant Services was accurate.

And a statement from CDNN President Charlie Crawford was posted on the NSSF site. "We were contacted recently by First Data/Citi Merchant Services by a June Rivera-Mantilla stating that we were terminated and funds were being seized for selling firearms in a non-face-to-face transaction. Although perfectly legal, we were also informed that no transactions would be processed in the future, even for non-firearms. I find this very frightening."

"We discussed with Mr. [Charlie] Crawford said termination due to the sale of firearms in a non face-to-face environment," the letter said. "Keep in mind that a violation of the Gun Control Act occurs when a gun offered online is sold to an individual in another State; the act prohibits selling a handgun to a resident of another state. Shipping across state lines is also banned, yet guns for sale online reach people across the country. We at Citi Merchant Service are unable to monitor or track adherence to these Gun Control laws," the letter said.

NSSF officials posted the information on their website, prompting a request from Citi Merchant Services to take the information down.

"The posting is inaccurate," an e-mail, signed only First Data Corp., told the foundation. "Further, while we generally do not comment on individual merchant customers, we would like to briefly address the 12/26 letter posted on your web site. Regretfully, that letter did a less than satisfactory job of expressing applicable policies."

The e-mail said Citi Merchant Services and First Data "do process firearms transactions. Our policy restrictions address only the sale of firearms in a non face-to-face environment." Those happen when a cardholder is "not present in front of a merchant and includes mail order and online purchases."

"It is our policy not to service merchants that make non face-to-face sales in a number of industries, including firearms," the e-mail said.

The foundation declined to change its information.

"Regrettably, your e-mail serves to confirm the anti-gun corporate policy of First Data and Citi Merchant Services and that the article in our publication 'Bullet Points,' and subsequent posting to our Website, was based on a correct and accurate understanding of that policy…," the group said.

"Furthermore, the policy of First Data and Citi Merchant Services interferes with the receiving and shipping of inventory from and to federally licensed firearms retailers, distributors and manufacturers. This inventory supplies not only law-abiding Americans, but military and law enforcement agencies as well," the foundation said.

In a statement to WND, Cara Taylor, communications director for First Data, continued to maintain that the NSSF postings were inaccurate.

"First Data processes more card transactions for gun sales in a face to face environment than any other credit card processor," her statement said. "We do not have a position in the debate about gun control policy. Our credit policies center around certain transactions that occur in a non face-to-face environment and involve third parties to which First Data has no contractual relationship, and therefore pose business concerns about the risk of certain types of transactions."

Ryan Horsley, a spokesman for Red's Trading Post in Twin Falls, Idaho, which has its own battle running over gun sales restrictions, said it appears to be another channel through which anti-gun interests can apply pressure to gun retailers.

He told WND he's experienced difficulties with several other card companies "that have taken that bias."

He said he's even heard of personal accounts at billing industry giant PayPal being cancelled because a single transaction involving a gun.

As WND has reported, Horsley's company is in a court fight now with the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives over paperwork errors that largely involved insignificant issues, such as a missing poster or a purchaser failing to provide a county of residence to accompany and street and city address.

Inspectors for the BATFE have been visiting his business regularly in search of records mistakes, he said.

WND also reported earlier how the store appears to be caught up in a new campaign for gun control, focusing on the elimination of retail outlets through technical rules infractions.

His battle is pending in federal court.

Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America told WND that as recently as 15 or 20 years ago, there were 250,000 licensed gun dealers in the United States. The federal government confirms there are only about 108,000 now.

It was in 2000 when a series of WorldNetDaily reports exposed Citibank's practice of denying banking services to firearms business, and the global financial giant reversed its "longstanding" policy.

A spokesman at that time said firearms businesses would be reviewed just like other businesses in determining whether account services would be provided. The reversal came after a situation in which a Las Vegas branch of Citibank closed a three-day-old checking account opened by the Nevada Pistol Academy, a local shooting club. At that time, local area branch managers told the academy's director, Chris Lorenzo, in a letter, "Due to Citibank not maintaining accounts for businesses that deal in weapons," the account would have to be closed.

ALL GLOCK
01-31-2008, 19:51
What comes around goes around......... Lol

The_Gun_Guru
01-31-2008, 20:09
Citibank sucks anyway!

They are as pathetic as Bank of America which gives credit cards to ILLEGAL ALIENS!

Let me repeat that:

Bank of America gives credit cards to ILLEGAL ALIENS!!!!

Boycott CITI and BOA and hopefully they will die a slow, lingering death!!!!!!






:whistling:

Sometimes I am ashamed to call myself an American when I see stuff like this.:crying::crying::crying:

dave_pro2a
01-31-2008, 20:23
Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America told WND that as recently as 15 or 20 years ago, there were 250,000 licensed gun dealers in the United States. The federal government confirms there are only about 108,000 now.

Of course the BATFE hasn't waged a war of intimidation and attrition on FFLs. Nope, no way.

Seafarer12
01-31-2008, 20:26
citi bank sucks, they all can go off in a hole and die for all i care.

ALL GLOCK
01-31-2008, 21:11
citi bank sucks, they all can go off in a hole and die for all i care.

Same with CDNN

sgtlmj
01-31-2008, 21:16
http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=819501&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=819157&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=808668&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=809742&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=808211&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=807660&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=807746&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=807770&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=807503&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=807006&highlight=citi

http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=807012&highlight=citi

Brigrat
01-31-2008, 21:18
I used this as the perfect excuse to close an old credit card account that was paid off...I hope they begin to get the picture...

remat
02-01-2008, 00:13
NRA is already working on it...

PA45ACP
02-01-2008, 08:08
Call me naive, but this sounds solely political and opinionated. If in Citi's position, with the laws in place that we have, who cares. The laws take care of the gun end. The end they need to be concerned with is getting paid for the service. I could see an arguement if everyone who bought a firearm with a card maxed it out and didn't pay up, then it would be their concern. But they are making money off the deal, and are not, to my understanding, held accountable for any of the law end.

I am wrong in my thinking? Or did I miss the point of the thread?

silversport
02-02-2008, 08:42
I've never minded someone or a company taking a stand and sticking to it...I just choose not to do business with companies that take stands that I find un American...their choice to not allow this...my choice to send my monies elsewhere...and I have...left BOA for their beliefs...I am sure I am not "hurting" them but if enough of us stand up...it sure will...
Bill

grecco
02-02-2008, 12:18
I called CitiBank and closed my credit card account.
I specifically mentioned CDNN.

MrGlock21
02-02-2008, 13:17
I called CitiBank and closed my credit card account.
I specifically mentioned CDNN.

Good for you!

I did the same a year ago when I found out about their policies. They are anti-gun and left leaning for a long time.

Always let them know why you quit doing business.

Blitzer
04-04-2008, 12:46
Here is a copy of the letter.

http://i199.photobucket.com/albums/aa288/Blitzer0101/Glocktalk/termination-CDNN_Citibank.jpg

FullClip
04-04-2008, 13:22
And make sure to find out who really runs your credit card even if it has the name of your local bank on it. My Mastercard was issued by a "local" Maine Bank, but come to find out, it's really ran by Citibank. I found out when they blocked a transaction I was trying to make here in Spain. They thought it was suspicious, and when I called them to find out what was going on, they asked if I'd "informed" them I'd be leaving the USA. Like I gotta' tell them, especially since I've used it for the past 10 years everywhere from Argentina to Switzerland.

Was a nice incentive to pay off the card and take the sissors to it..:supergrin:

My Am-Ex will do until I get home then I'll check out another bank for a Visa / MC. Maybe even one from the AARP as I'll be eligible!:supergrin:

Guntec
04-04-2008, 13:36
This is just like Paypal when it said you can't use paypal funds on firearm purchases.

DonD
04-04-2008, 13:56
I don't know how bad Citi is but BofA are jerks. I used to have a lot of money in certificates of deposit with MBNA before BofA bought them out. MBNA was nice to work with, good rates, good customer service, easy to get a live human to talk with. They'd even give you a better than advertised interest rate if you had significant funds with them.

BofA is the exact opposite. Lousy interest rates, very hard to get a live person to talk to, don't care if you come or go. Have cashed in every CD as they become mature and will continue to do so until I have nothing with them. Guess what? They're so big they just are oblivious. I thought I'd at least get some computer generated letter asking why I'm withdrawing funds but never have.

As to the issue with CDNN, stinking lousy corporate political correctness. Citi has been too busy screwing the nations' economy with rotten subprime mortgage loans. Add to that liberal, anti-gun corporate attitudes and their behavior with CDNN isn't suprising. I'm sure CDNN will find someone more interested in treating them properly or at least I hope so, they're good people to deal with. Don

Paul7
04-05-2008, 07:42
Simple, CDNN needs to find another processor and go after Citibank legally for the $75,000 of their money they're holding.

byf43
04-05-2008, 08:00
And make sure to find out who really runs your credit card even if it has the name of your local bank on it. My Mastercard was issued by a "local" Maine Bank, but come to find out, it's really ran by Citibank. I found out when they blocked a transaction I was trying to make here in Spain. They thought it was suspicious, and when I called them to find out what was going on, they asked if I'd "informed" them I'd be leaving the USA. Like I gotta' tell them, especially since I've used it for the past 10 years everywhere from Argentina to Switzerland.

Was a nice incentive to pay off the card and take the sissors to it..:supergrin:

My Am-Ex will do until I get home then I'll check out another bank for a Visa / MC. Maybe even one from the AARP as I'll be eligible!:supergrin:


I had read that AARP is giving monies to the Brady Bunch.

Can anyone confirm???

I've been eligible to join AARP for several years and won't, because of what I read.

Thoughts?????

bno762
04-05-2008, 08:03
This is just like Paypal when it said you can't use paypal funds on firearm purchases.

Paypal has like $55 of mine I cant get. All because I had once said I'd take paypal for a knife sale. I have to keep rereadn and agreeing to their rules. But keep getn emails about this crap. Bad thing is its s friggn knife!:steamed:

bno762
04-05-2008, 08:07
And according to citibanks own letter if it was true cdnn and Mr. Crawford would be getn arrested and be goin to prison. They are so full of $#^%@#. I get sick of their $#@%! CDNN and Mr. Crawford: You will get some kind of buisness from me with in the next week.Even if its small I'm gonna throw somethin your way. Hate to see a company that is doin right by us getn screwed by them. rant over.

wally05
04-05-2008, 10:04
What the hell is up with this? The gun company has broken no laws... what a load of crap. I'll definitely no be joining them. I did paypal for a recent "transaction" ... hope they don't find out! :)