Glock SBR Loop Hole?

[Hellhunter18]

Hey guys I was just wondering if this would be legal or not.




Why do this... I don't know just for the cool factor. :whistling:

Anyway can it be done without being considered a SBR?

[B.Reid]

No pic!

[Hellhunter18]

sorry pic up now.

[Glockdude1]

How would you aim the Glock? With it under the hand guards of the AR, you can't use the sights. You would be better of just registering the pistol as a SBR, and using a correct stock.
http://san1.atlanta.gbhinc.com/GB/108031000/108031839/pix776818359.jpg

[Hellhunter18]

I was thinking laser not the glock or use the ar sites. remember this in not a serious tactical thinking. Just a range fun idea.

Was just thinking hey could this get around having to regester my gun as an SBR Hmmm...

[nnickatnight]

This is the stock I have, it's awesome and puts that plastic thing to shame.

[Glockdude1]

This is the stock I have, it's awesome and puts that plastic thing to shame.

C'mon now, Glocks are not all that bad........ :rofl:

[GMAN40]

A waste of money! Best using the money to buy ammo so you don't need this stock.

[Hellhunter18]

I don't want a stock!!!! Guys I just want to know if I attach the glock via the glock scope mount will it be considered a SBR? or will it be a pistole with a AR on it? :tongueout:

Anyway I Know about the add on stocks for glocks. I don't want one. This was just some crazy idea I had.

Sooooo is it legal???

[Butch]

Yeah, it would have to be a SBR......you're attaching a stock to it are you not?




:patriot:

[Hellhunter18]

Look at this.

[WellArmedSheep]

Not sure of the legality, but I'm even less sure of the point.

[Hellhunter18]

Just A Dumb Idea. But i saw a similar product for military forces that did the same thing...

Just wondering.

I mean why put a stock on a handgun anyway? Yet people do.

I have all the parts and was just thinking. Thats it.

[Tweek's Turbos]

So, adding a stock is a short barrel rifle. How picky are "they" about allowing this?


And that butt stock "camera mount" some website sells is basically the stock for making a sbr right?

[WellArmedSheep]

Just A Dumb Idea. But i saw a similar product for military forces that did the same thing...

Just wondering.

I mean why put a stock on a handgun anyway? Yet people do.

I have all the parts and was just thinking. Thats it.

Hey, that's cool!

Regulating SBS's and SBR's is, in my opinion, kinda silly.

BATFE: "You want to make that handgun less easily concealed but no more deadly?!? OH NO! You've got to give us $200 first."

:upeyes:

[Hellhunter18]

Hey, that's cool!

Regulating SBS's and SBR's is, in my opinion, kinda silly.

BATFE: "You want to make that handgun less easily concealed but no more deadly?!? OH NO! You've got to give us $200 first."

:upeyes:

I agree. Now that it is a range only gun, or at the most a home defence piece will you pay us some money first. for 200 bucks I would invest in a new glock. :supergrin:

[BamaTrooper]

Hey, that's cool!

Regulating SBS's and SBR's is, in my opinion, kinda silly.

BATFE: "You want to make that handgun less easily concealed but no more deadly?!? OH NO! You've got to give us $200 first."

:upeyes:

WAS, I think it is the opposite that is the concern, making a 12 gauge into a pistol and having the power in a short package.

[WellArmedSheep]

WAS, I think it is the opposite that is the concern, making a 12 gauge into a pistol and having the power in a short package.

Yeah, well...you, sir, need to take your logic elsewhere! :tongueout:

:rofl:

[Hellhunter18]

Well I still need to know.....

[Butch]

Well I still need to know.....
Granted, it's basically worthless and wouldn't enhance the shootability of the handgun (and the rifle would be much more of a threat), but you're still attaching a stock to a handgun. Unless you also add a 16" barrel, it would be a short barreled rifle.




:patriot: