Pneudraulic Specialists [Archive] - Glock Talk

PDA

View Full Version : Pneudraulic Specialists


lauren044
01-25-2009, 21:22
Are there any specialists out there? Pneudraulics is high pressure air and fluid. C-47, C/EC/R-121, F-106A/B, F-4C/D/E, F-16A/B, Kc-135A, B-52G.

C5GreaseMonkey
01-25-2009, 21:32
you named every plane but the one that uses the most of it. lol

lauren044
01-27-2009, 12:30
And which plane was that? LOL My Glock 34 is super with the crimson tracer and light mounted on the rail.

C5GreaseMonkey
01-27-2009, 21:36
And which plane was that?

The C-5!

My Glock 34 is super with the crimson tracer and light mounted on the rail.

Uhh..... what?

coker737
01-28-2009, 10:30
the c-5!



Uhh..... What?


b-52d

C5GreaseMonkey
01-28-2009, 11:49
b-52d


You think so? NO WAY!

We have fwd and aft loading complexes, a visor that opens, 2 pressure doors that have to move, a aft center door and 2 aft side doors, then all the ramps, plus our kneeling system. Thats right, our plane squats on its own. We have power castered rear gears too. All of that and we arnt even including the 3 different backup systems our plane has.

lauren044
01-28-2009, 13:05
U mean Fat Albert, but I guess the new C-117 gives the C-5A Run for it's money. They invested all that money to upgrade the C-141 bu stretching it befor and aft of the wings and giving it an in-flight refueling system then put it in the bone yard. Seems like a waste of money.........:faint::patriot:

C5GreaseMonkey
01-28-2009, 13:23
U mean Fat Albert, but I guess the new C-117 gives the C-5A Run for it's money. They invested all that money to upgrade the C-141 bu stretching it befor and aft of the wings and giving it an in-flight refueling system then put it in the bone yard. Seems like a waste of money.........:faint::patriot:

Nah not really, the c-5 can carry 3 times the payload and now that the new c-5M's are delivering next month, we can now travel farther, faster, and on shorter runways then before.

coker737
01-28-2009, 15:46
You think so? NO WAY!

We have fwd and aft loading complexes, a visor that opens, 2 pressure doors that have to move, a aft center door and 2 aft side doors, then all the ramps, plus our kneeling system. Thats right, our plane squats on its own. We have power castered rear gears too. All of that and we arnt even including the 3 different backup systems our plane has.

Yea, your right. Just the Boiler room made me dizzy:rofl:

coker737
01-28-2009, 15:49
Nah not really, the c-5 can carry 3 times the payload and now that the new c-5M's are delivering next month, we can now travel farther, faster, and on shorter runways then before.

I liked the C-17 but there just something about having an acft that size and NO STEERING WHEEL. I want a set of antlers to drive with.

As my Posse would say. The C-5, The Fans of Freedom

C5GreaseMonkey
01-28-2009, 16:34
Yea, your right. Just the Boiler room made me dizzy:rofl:

Yeah! :faint:

lauren044
01-28-2009, 18:31
:patriot:It does not really make a difference what we like or dislike about the various aircraft the USAF uses, were all brothers and took the same oath of enlistment and it was for the good of our country that we served her doing what we could to keep them flying so they could do the job they were intended for.:eagle:

C5GreaseMonkey
01-28-2009, 18:45
no ones arguing, lol, just comparing