Important Notice: The site is currently being upgraded to a new software system. This process could take a day or two to complete. During that time, we are going to leave the site up here, on its old software. WHAT GETS POSTED HERE DURING THIS TRANSITION WILL NOT BE COPIED OVER ONTO THE NEW SITE, WHEN THE UPGRADE IS COMPLETE. When we swap over, the content posted while this message is visible will be lost. We wanted to give you folks a place to hang out and talk while we worked though. We will let you know when we are finished. Please pardon the inconvenience, during this transition.

Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

sbs762 sbs762 is offline

gun nut

Visitor Messages

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 1 of 1
  1. Peace Warrior
    12-16-2008 17:36
    Peace Warrior
    Good position on the we are all mormon thread. Makes me think.

    here's a point that may change how you feel:

    In the first place, by its very nature, marriage has always been, and currently is a socio-religious, heterosexual institution; consequently, when the word marriage is used, it always has, and currently is indicating only a socio-religious, heterosexual institution. So knowing, there is no need to over define marriage by referring to its institution as "heterosexual marriage."

    With that out of the way, marriage itself came into existence BEFORE the establishment of governments. Marriage itself is a socio-religious institution. After marriage, then came the family as a product of marriages, which both marriage and families came BEFORE the establishing of governments.

    Much like the right to bare arms was indeed in place and an accepted fact in American BEFORE the drafting of the Constitution or Bill of Rights, marriage was also in place before the drafting of these two documents. The history of marriage is unequivocal. No one was trying to define marriage as a definition wasn't needed. The only reason amendments are being drafted nowadays is because of homosexuals that are trying to actually RE-DEFINE marriage.

    The homosexuals are the one trying to create a new definition for marriage, but more importantly, the government officials also understand that the government has no right to redefine an institution that existed before it did.

About Me

  • About sbs762
    Middle GA
  • Signature
    Always be reading.


Total Posts
Visitor Messages
General Information
  • Last Activity: 03-22-2011 19:45
  • Join Date: 01-28-2004
  • Referrals: 0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 00:49.