![]() |
I added yet another classic S&W to the collection :)
In discussions in my thread yesterday about my new S&W 39, the rare steel version was mentioned several times. I added that one of the 39's descendants, the seldom seen 539, was basically a steel 39. All the while I knew that my favorite local shop had one in the case for a few days. ;)
Well, all that talk made me want to grab it. I do about 75% of my over the counter purchases and ALL of my Gunbroker transfers at this shop. Because of that, they usually give me a huge discount on used guns when they buy them cheap and their margins are high. This 539 is in the same beautiful condition as the the 39 I bought yesterday. They gave me $100 off the $519 price tag it had on it, so I got it out the door at $450. Its not the amazing deal I got yeaterday, but still a great deal in every way. The 539 is not common and Gunbroker prices are usually over $600 for models in great shape. That's when they're on there. Many times, I don't see a single 539 listed. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=308583309 http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=308749725 At any rate, the 539 has the guard on the rear sight and a steel frame, but otherwise its basically the same gun as the 39. I'm not sure the exact number S&W made, but it was between 5 and 10,000. That's rare compared to many other Smiths. They were only built from 1982-1985. Can anyone tell me which of those years mine was produced based on the serial #? Anyway, please enjoy the pics. As always, I appreciate your thoughts on my latest addition. I've bought quite a few S&W handguns this year. :supergrin: Thanks! :) http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/u...ituc/015-5.jpg http://i636.photobucket.com/albums/u...tuc/001-17.jpg |
|
Damn Brian! You're on a roll brother! :cool:
|
All the S&W semi owners. Bac is coming! HIDE YOUR GUNS!
|
Quote:
No, this is it. At least for a while. :cool: |
Nice.:cool:
1982 A745001 – A806399 |
Quote:
Its one of the earlier models, I guess. That was a lot easier than trying to date my 39. :dunno: |
Very nice shooter. Do you have a 3 inch model 19 revolver by any chance? Or a 2.5 inch? Those are my favorite Smith's of all time.
The A serial numbers are when they started keeping good records in the 70s, when the feds started to get off their asses because of the 68 GCA. |
Nicely done. The whole "39" series is a field, specialty if you will, that has been overlooked. There are several "variants" and enough model changes to make it, I think, almost more interesting than collection the "dash" numbers of some Smith revolvers.
|
Quote:
They are great revolvers though. :cool: |
Very nice find! I have seen more steel frame 39's (two) than I have seen 539s.
|
Quote:
Yeah, the 539s are not very common. This is the first one I've seen in years, actually. |
Man, that is nice Bac. I passed on one a few years ago, and kicked myself for that.
I do have a really nice 59-2 on layaway. |
WOW! Nice catch! Immaculate by the looks of the pics. And a steal, to boot!
J |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I've passed on a couple guns I really regret as well. |
Quote:
I learn something new every day. :cool: Here's mine. :) http://i473.photobucket.com/albums/r...1023/004-2.jpg |
You know...now that I look at the paperwork from the shop, it doesn't say it's a -2. I had just assumed it was based on most of the 39's I see being -2. I'll have to check the next time I'm in there and see.
That one's on the back burner for right now anyway. I've got a line on a nother 24-3, 44 Special. The semi can wait. :supergrin: |
I bet those guys at that gun shop love you. :thumbsup:
|
Quote:
IIRC the -1 or fist change was a change to the feed ramp on the 59, -2 was the change in the factory sights. Somewhere in there ther wa also an extractor change IIRC. Some of the first 59s had some feeding problems that were corrected by a change in the feed ramp |
That one be nice! Darn good photography too.
|
You make me want to believe in the tooth fairy and wishes.......
Nice gun! |
Those are "real guns". I love seeing the classic Smith's. Takes me back about 30 years. :)
|
Another very nice addition to your collection. Of my older S&W semiautomatics the 1066 and 559 are my favorites. The 559 is in wonderful condition.
http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t.../DSC001102.jpg It's also a pretty good shooter to. http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/t.../DSC001312.jpg I did not add any new S&W semiautomatics to my collection this year. Got side tracked with N frames and older K frames, a couple off nice rifles too. I'll make a point of getting at least one next year, hopefully a 4506. We'll see. For the time being I've got a Ruger Alaskan in .454 Casull in the works. They're getting hard to find so I jumped on it. Anyways, congrats on both of them! |
I officially declare bac a gunaholic, in an exclusive club with membership of one! No one can touch you. Congrats, brother.:cool::wavey:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:48. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2011, Glock Talk, All Rights Reserved.