Glock Talk

Glock Talk (http://glocktalk.com/forums/index.php)
-   Religious Issues (http://glocktalk.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   JPL Wins religious discrimination suit (http://glocktalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1466176)

void * 01-20-2013 12:54

JPL Wins religious discrimination suit
 
Apologies if this has been posted before - I did a couple of quick searches and nothing came back.

A while back, here on GT, there were a couple of threads about this lawsuit.

The results are in:

http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/brea...nation-lawsuit


Full proposed statement of decision at http://ncse.com/files/20121130_Propo...f-Decision.pdf

The court's ruling adopting the proposed statement of decision: http://ncse.com/files/20130116_Court...f_Decision.pdf

Japle 01-20-2013 13:42

"The evidence shows that Caltech has a detailed layoff policy, incorporating a layoff ranking process, which (Coppedge's supervisor) carried out. The evidence clearly shows that (Coppedge's co- workers) were more qualified than Coppedge regarding the skills needed on the project going forward, such as SCO/ ITL, web servers, and Linux, and that Coppedge had a history of poor customer relationships, particularly in comparison to the other System Administrators," the judgement said.

Poorly qualified and a jerk. Of course they fired him.

Gunhaver 01-20-2013 13:43

:rock::exercise::devildance::dancingbanana::jumpingjacks::snoopy:

JBnTX 01-20-2013 15:18

Satan wins another one...:steamed:

"You will be hated by all because of My name, but the one who endures to the end, he will be saved." - Mark 13:13

..

Sarge1400 01-20-2013 17:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBnTX (Post 19889792)
Satan wins another one...:steamed:

"You will be hated by all because of My name, but the one who endures to the end, he will be saved." - Mark 13:13

..

Are you saying the should have kept him, even though others were clearly more qualified, simply because he was religious?

Glock36shooter 01-20-2013 18:38

If it's ignorant to consider creationism as a Christian Religious view... why is it religious discrimination even if they did lay him off for accepting creationism? Seems they laid of a scientist that accepts junk science. Can't be religious discrimination if creationism is just an alternative scientific explanation. If creationism IS a religious view... it isn't any kind of science.

JBnTX 01-20-2013 19:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarge1400 (Post 19890428)

Are you saying the should have kept him, even though others were clearly more qualified, simply because he was religious?

My post says what it says.

Sarge1400 01-20-2013 19:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBnTX (Post 19890731)
My post says what it says.

Lol, ok. Watch out for the boogeyman.

Cavalry Doc 01-20-2013 19:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glock36shooter (Post 19890625)
If it's ignorant to consider creationism as a Christian Religious view...

It's not an ignorant claim to claim that, it's obviously a gnostic claim to claim that. Not a smidgen more gnostic to claim that there has never been a deity. Prejudgement should be avoided as much as possible, and tolerance should be pursued, well, if you don't want to see 7 figure legal settlements.

Quote:

why is it religious discrimination even if they did lay him off for accepting creationism? Seems they laid of a scientist that accepts junk science. Can't be religious discrimination if creationism is just an alternative scientific explanation. If creationism IS a religious view... it isn't any kind of science.
If it can be proven that his supervisors treated him differently because of his beliefs, there is a case here. His lawyers will be very happy about that.

The bold and enlarged red portion of your post above seem to imply that you don't understand a lot about EEO or the first amendment to the Constitution. There is also a very high probability that you do not have a lot of experience in labor relations law. Do some case law searches, and you will realize that being legally protected does not mean that their opinions agree with yours. In fact, discriminating solely based on a religious belief that you disagree with, might open you and your organization up to a rather large amount of financial liability. In fact, a manager posting online that they support that kind of behavior, can open themselves and their employer to a surprising amount of liability, both personal and organizational.

Cavalry Doc 01-20-2013 19:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarge1400 (Post 19890428)
Are you saying the should have kept him, even though others were clearly more qualified, simply because he was religious?

You'd be surprised how much information you can get with the FIOA and title 5 USC 7114(b)(4).

Personal emails between management officials are not off limits. If someone made a statement that a disinterested third party would agree was religiously discriminatory, and he was denied a job based on his religious persuasion, the bosses are screwed.

Sarge1400 01-20-2013 19:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc (Post 19890827)
You'd be surprised how much information you can get with the FIOA and title 5 USC 7114(b)(4).

Personal emails between management officials are not off limits. If someone made a statement that a disinterested third party would agree was religiously discriminatory, and he was denied a job based on his religious persuasion, the bosses are screwed.

I don't disagree, but it hardly means "Satan wins". :rofl:

Gunhaver 01-20-2013 19:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glock36shooter (Post 19890625)
If it's ignorant to consider creationism as a Christian Religious view... why is it religious discrimination even if they did lay him off for accepting creationism? Seems they laid of a scientist that accepts junk science. Can't be religious discrimination if creationism is just an alternative scientific explanation. If creationism IS a religious view... it isn't any kind of science.

Oh, snap! :cool:

I wonder if I could get my masters in geology, go to work for a oil or mineral prospecting company, immediately switch to a YEC view of geology and then claim religious discrimination when they fired my ass for being useless?

"You won't find any copper over there fellas, the great flood done washed it all away!"

or

"No oil over here. Can't be any oil anywhere. It takes millions of years for that stuff to form and the bible shows the earth to be only 6000 years old!"

Seems like that wouldn't fly.

Cavalry Doc 01-20-2013 20:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sarge1400 (Post 19890881)
I don't disagree, but it hardly means "Satan wins". :rofl:

I don't know this satan fellow. But Prima facie, there are some people that forked up. It'll take time to tell.

Cavalry Doc 01-20-2013 20:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunhaver (Post 19890896)
Oh, snap! :cool:

I wonder if I could get my masters in geology, go to work for a oil or mineral prospecting company, immediately switch to a YEC view of geology and then claim religious discrimination when they fired my ass for being useless?

"You won't find any copper over there fellas, the great flood done washed it all away!"

or

"No oil over here. Can't be any oil anywhere. It takes millions of years for that stuff to form and the bible shows the earth to be only 6000 years old!"

Seems like that wouldn't fly.

Well you got jokes, but when the judges get involved, they are going to have to answer the question.

"why is it religious discrimination even if they did lay him off for accepting creationism?"

The bell will be rung, and you might be surprised how this one might go down.

void * 01-20-2013 22:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc (Post 19890805)
If it can be proven that his supervisors treated him differently because of his beliefs, there is a case here. His lawyers will be very happy about that.

You seem to have missed a trick, CD.

The case is done and dusted, and Coppedge lost on *every single claim he made*. There cannot be a case when the court has already ruled against you. So you might want to stop arguing as though there were a potential case here. Discovery already done, case was filed in 2010 ... this is the *ruling*.

steveksux 01-20-2013 22:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBnTX (Post 19889792)
Satan wins another one...:steamed:

"You will be hated by all because of My name, but the one who endures to the end, he will be saved." - Mark 13:13

..

So you're saying Satan was responsible for his relative lack of qualifications compared to the guys that weren't laid off, and Satan was responsible for him being a dick to his customers?

Randy

Animal Mother 01-21-2013 01:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc (Post 19890805)
If it can be proven that his supervisors treated him differently because of his beliefs, there is a case here. His lawyers will be very happy about that.

One, the decision has already been made. That's what the OP is about. Two, it isn't religious discrimination if someone's religious beliefs prevent them from doing the job they were hired to do. Especially when those beliefs are not central tenets of their religion. That is why some states are trying to enact laws to protect pharmacists against having to dispense birth control and why we don't have a flood of Jehovah's Witnesses as phlebotomists.
Quote:

The bold and enlarged red portion of your post above seem to imply that you don't understand a lot about EEO or the first amendment to the Constitution.
Where does the first amendment protect anyone from being fired for being less suited to their position than other employees?
Quote:

There is also a very high probability that you do not have a lot of experience in labor relations law.
Do you?
Quote:

Do some case law searches, and you will realize that being legally protected does not mean that their opinions agree with yours. In fact, discriminating solely based on a religious belief that you disagree with, might open you and your organization up to a rather large amount of financial liability. In fact, a manager posting online that they support that kind of behavior, can open themselves and their employer to a surprising amount of liability, both personal and organizational.
And the decision, as detailed in the first post of the thread, concludes that no such discrimination occurred nor was the individual fired on the basis of his religious beliefs. Silly though they may be.

Glock36shooter 01-21-2013 08:53

I feel sorry for stupid people.

Cavalry Doc 01-21-2013 09:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by void * (Post 19891558)
You seem to have missed a trick, CD.

The case is done and dusted, and Coppedge lost on *every single claim he made*. There cannot be a case when the court has already ruled against you. So you might want to stop arguing as though there were a potential case here. Discovery already done, case was filed in 2010 ... this is the *ruling*.

OK. you're right there.

Looks the claims were weighed and adjudicated. But the statement from another said.

Quote:

why is it religious discrimination even if they did lay him off for accepting creationism?
I guess the proper answer should have been, well if that happened, that would be religious discrimination.

JBnTX 01-21-2013 09:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glock36shooter (Post 19892461)

I feel sorry for stupid people.

Do you use a certain standard to determine this "stupidity", or is it just defined by people who disagree with you?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:31.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2013, Glock Talk, All Rights Reserved.