Originally Posted by uz2bUSMC
Yea, I don't see him as beng the "Save the Agents" type. He needed money going into retirement time.
Didn't the rounds penetrate on Platt just fine? Thought it was bad placement?
I like Macpherson, just not the others. Well, in all fairness... I suspect I wouldn't give a crap about what Fackler has to say but family issues apparently have him away from such debates.
Needed money? Your bias is showing. Again.
BTW try reading this:
That way you won't be talking out of your ass.
I find this post of yours to be particularly irritating in the way it combines your extreme prejudicial bias with your lack of knowledge.
Fackler, a trauma surgeon, tried to limit the discussion of terminal ballistics to what could be explained by known physiologic principles specifically to counter the arguments and opinions of people with no medical background who relied on data that was both incomplete and haphazardly collected.