Conflicting standards, perhaps.
FMJ are required for armies under the Hague Convention of 1899. That convention moved away from expanding type bullets because they were deemed too cruel.
Sure the current argument is that FMJs have more tendency than HPs to to over-penetrate, and thus, potentially pose a threat to any bystander behind the BG. But it's beyond the shooter's control if the BG turns out to be skinny rather that fat. In any case, the average American in 2011 is much more fatter than the average European in 1899.
Of course, there's also the "if FMJs are legal, they're appropriate" argument.
For your consideration.
Although many good citizens own and carry guns, keeping communities safe still fall on those who carry badges.
In a gunfight, even if you do everything right, you can still get killed.
Last edited by Patchman; 05-20-2011 at 19:29..