Originally Posted by steveksux
One point that should be blatantly obvious to everyone at this point.
It doesn't matter which side of this debate is right or wrong....
The fact that on a gun centric forum there is a controversy over whether shooting the guy under these circumstances is justifiable should raise a HUGE RED FLAG as to whether a jury of 12 "normal" non-gun centric folks will think it is reasonable.
They set the reasonable standard, not us. And if we can't even agree... good luck with the jury.
IMO that really sums it all up, and is the essence of the whole issue.