Originally Posted by steveksux
One point that should be blatantly obvious to everyone at this point.
It doesn't matter which side of this debate is right or wrong....
The fact that on a gun centric forum there is a controversy over whether shooting the guy under these circumstances is justifiable should raise a HUGE RED FLAG as to whether a jury of 12 "normal" non-gun centric folks will think it is reasonable.
They set the reasonable standard, not us. And if we can't even agree... good luck with the jury.
That is a good point. However, I sometimes like to think that most of those offering advice/suggestions/feedback/thought process are doing so under the knowledge that 12 "peers" will be the judge so that is already taken into account