Originally Posted by WarCry
Why do you believe the 2nd Amendment should be the only absolute right of the Bill of Rights? None of the others are.
I’ll answer your question with two questions. What does ”SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”
mean? Does any other Amendments end in that phrase?
Edited to add:
The founder felt so strongly about the RIGHT
of The People to KEEP and “BEAR” arms”
that they made sure EVERYONE
would know the right was ABSOLUTE
. However the government and the socialists have dumbed so many of the people down they can’t read simple English and comprehend the meaning.
A militia being necessary to a free state, (an armed citizenry of each state is necessary to protect the state from government tyranny), the RIGHT
of The People SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
. (the gummeyment is not allowed to put restrictions on citizens owning and carrying firearms. Anyone that does not comprehend that is either out to control the rights of others or is a complete idiot.
Does this sound like the founders wanted to allow restrictions or want the 2nd. to be ABSOLUTE?
“I ask sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.” George Mason
“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” Thomas Jefferson
“Americans need not fear the federal government because they enjoy the advantage of being armed, which you possess over the people of almost every other nation.” James Madison
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria.
"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it." Thomas Jefferson
"Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?" Patrick Henry
The atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. They deserve a place of honor with all good men. [George Washington]
"Arms in the hands of the citizens may be used at individual discretion for the defense of the country, the overthrow of tyranny or private self-defense." --John Adams
"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government . . . . No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms in his own hands." --Thomas Jefferson
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword, because the whole of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."--Noah Webster, 1787
of The People to keep and bear was meant to be an is ABSOLUTE
. Any law to the contrary is unconstitutional.