Originally Posted by WoodenPlank
It's an interesting test, but that's not the same as typical use, either. Plus, per scientific testing, results are only valid if repeatable. Not saying it's bull, but you should take all of it with a grain of salt unless the tests are done several times with the same results.
Granted it's no PRJ publication, it's quite a bit more substantial than anything posted in this thread.
Kind of like the OP's test between the two ARs.