Originally Posted by Jerry
So I'm guessing "you" don't think it's necessary so no one "needs" it so it's OK to "restrict" it? We don't need cars and motorcycles that go 200 MPH. We don't "NEED" to hunt for food anymore. I could go on all day with a list of the things we don't "NEED". However! In a FREE country people can have what they want whether they need it or not.
I don't need/even want a full auto firearm, but I'd respect every individual's 2nd amendment right to own one if they wished. I don't get the hype over full autos, and why everyone acts as if it'd be the end of the world if they were not regulated like they are today.
Probably a short answer is, those who own FA right now, would see their investment go down the toilet if it were made legal/unrestricted.
If you don't pay taxes, you shouldn't vote.
"A tax loophole is something that benefits the other guy. If it benefits you, it's called a tax reform"
When Obama raises your boss's taxes, and you lose your job, how does that make you better off?