Originally Posted by Dragoon44
So in your personal interpretation of the constitution laws against malicious slanderous speech by either individuals or the press are unconstitutional.
In your wonderful world individuals and or the press can make knowingly false malicious statements about you and ruin your career, business, reputation because they are just engaging in their constitutionally guaranteed right of freedom of speech and freedom of the press. or do you think such laws are valid afterall?
Thankfully that is not how it is in the real world. It's only that way in the minds of those who think THEY are the authority in the interpretation of the Constitution.
You mean, can you use speech to harm another without consequence?
Not surprised to see you come down on the side of the heavy handed state but that's just weak.