Originally Posted by Goaltender66
You don't think it's slightly odd that the BLS dropped a report, without a big disclaimer that would keep the otherwise unbiased and scrupulously detail-oriented MSM from drawing the wrong conclusion, that did not include the data from "one large state" a mere month before a major election?
It's de rigeur for the BLS to release a report with incomplete data? That's not "tainted" in your mind?
Because I don't think it's normal and I can only think of one reason why the BLS would release such a thing. If you can think of another, by all means share with the group.
Why are you accepting these two questionable links as gospel?