View Single Post
Old 11-05-2012, 14:07   #191
CLM Number 135
Smartass Pilot
Geko45's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Short final
Posts: 13,392

Originally Posted by scccdoc View Post
The point is over your head if you do not relate the two. In nature, there IS aberrant behavior, so what's your point? If it exists, it is normal?
No, not really. Where does your definition of aberrant come from? It is a subjective definition that comes from you, not nature. The point being, if no one is around to define the idea of aberrant then there is no such thing. Even when someone does, that opinion is only valid for them.
CavDoc: "If you have to pretend that a person with a different opinion has an opinion other than his own in order to score points in an argument, you've forfeited any points that you pretended to have."
CavDoc: "You consider yourself as non-religious, and I consider you a religious zealot."

JBnTX: "Freedom of religion doesn't mean you can worship any God, anyway you see fit or not even worship any God if you so choose. [...] Christianity should be the only religion protected under the constitution, and congress shall make no law restricting its practice."
Geko45 is online now   Reply With Quote