[]; (function() { var gads = document.createElement('script'); gads.async = true; gads.type = 'text/javascript'; var useSSL = 'https:' == document.location.protocol; gads.src = (useSSL ? 'https:' : 'http:') + '//www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js'; var node = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; node.parentNode.insertBefore(gads, node); })(); Glock Talk - View Single Post - DOGS, The AR's that I should not even consider
View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 20:53   #158
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,450
RRA isn't a solid rebuttal.

When dates don't match up something is fishy. Specially when it seemed to be like pulling teeth to get the proof. Like the birth certificate thing.

Anyway, I'm not here to bash Spikes as like I said I have owned one and was happy w/ it. The wait however isn't worth it when there is equal or better for a similar price available w/o the wait.


Originally Posted by Warp View Post
Does that necessarily mean anything?

Is this all you have to support your claim? That the paperwork proving the materials are from a later date than the claim?
It means that the claims could not be proven. He could not produce paperwork showing certain lots were produced following milspec standards as he claimed.

Last edited by mjkeat; 11-14-2012 at 20:58..
mjkeat is offline