Quote:
Originally Posted by Peace Warrior
(Emp. mine)\
Radiometric dating does not prove the Earth to be billions of billions of years old. Evos already admit as much.

I suppose asking for evidence of this would be too much?
Quote:
am, stratigraphy, specifically as it relates to the geologic column and the age of the Earth, is what drives radiometric dating. One the whole, radiometric dating relies on the cross checking from index fossils, specifically, their placement within the certain stratum, in order to determine if the radiometric dates are to be used or literally thrown out as inconclusive or in error.

Seriously, we're going to go through this, again? Stratigraphy is not what drives radiometric dating, the known decay rate of radioactive isotopes is.
Quote:
Simply put, where it not for the predetermined dates derived from the geologic column, which by the way predates radiometric dating by over 50 years at least, then radiometric dating would have been thrown out by the evos themselves as something that was unreliable as well as a foolish methodology to scientifically determine the age of anything dug up and or found on the ground.

Another complete falsehood. How does the geologic column affect the decay of uranium235 to lead207 or uranium238 to lead206?