My math is suspect
Originally Posted by Geko45
You can't simply state that as fact. You need to support that statement with scholarly, unbiased sources (not an apologetics website). Current scientific thinking is that the rate of decay and the rate of introduction via cosmic rays of new carbon-14 are in relative equilibrium and have been for tens of thousands of years. Who exactly is stating that carbon-14 has been steadily building (despite its known decay rate) in our atmosphere and what findings do they have to support that (and what were their methods in collecting that data)?
, but C14 rates are growing over 20% more
than they are falling by way of decay.
Nonequilibrium RadioCarbon Dating Substantiated,
Vol. 2 - Melvin A. Cook, pp. 59 thru 68, (1986)
“After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it.” - William S. Burroughs
“Dear Diary, after learning new things about S.C.'s laws on the internet, I did not pretend to have already known this new information. I guess I fail at internet today." -P.W. 04-10-2015
"Love 'Em All!!! Let Jehovah sort 'em out." - The Holy Bible
""Are there more things that you need, or more that you don't need?""
Last edited by Peace Warrior; 11-20-2012 at 09:56..