Thread: The Holy Bible is both historically and scientifically correct.
View Single Post
Old 11-22-2012, 08:05   #312
Peace Warrior
CLM Number 221
Am Yisrael Chai
 
Peace Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: watching the Son rise again. ;)
Posts: 23,791
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbcooper View Post
I'm guessing your ideas about carbon 14 saturation come from Dr. Hovinds "research". ...
No they don't, but I most certainly highly respect and admire Brother Kent as a Christian. We don't agree 100% on all issues biblical. And Dr. Hovind anf I do not agree on all things scientific.

However, in my humble opinion, hands down, Pastor Kent Hovind is one the greatest Youth Pastors to ever walk on this planet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbcooper View Post
...Below you will find a link that explains why Hovind, Morris, Cook, Whitelaw, etc. are completely wrong in great detail.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood-c14.html

Folks get their own opinions, not their own facts.
They weren't wrong, it was clear that the work done by Willard Frank Libby, while admirable, was predicated on at least two assumptions.

Assumption one, he assumed the Earth was well over 30,000 years old. Assumption two, he assumed that the Earth's C14 level were already stabilized due to the Earth being well over 30,000 years old.

While Creationists disagree with both assumptions, even the evos disagree with his 'C14 already being in equilibrium' assumption.
__________________
“After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it.” - William S. Burroughs
"Nothing we're gonna do is going to fundamentally alter or eliminate the possibility of another mass shooting or guarantee that [our gun ban legislation] will bring gun deaths down..." - VPOTUS Joe Biden

"The object in quitting the Union was not to destroy, but to save the principles of the Constitution." - Alexander Stephens
Peace Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote