View Single Post
Old 01-07-2013, 19:35   #62
Courageouslion
Member
 
Courageouslion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 90
I believe that Alliant did this for one reason. Liabilty. You see, in the Speer Number 11 Reloading manual there is a 125 grain .357 magnum load listed as 16.3 grains of Blue Dot, 1602 FPS. Yes, you read that right! Here is my take, and BTW, the reason I have a #11 manual is because I have been loading for 30 years. I have a 4" Magna-Ported Colt Python that I actually worked up to the maximum load that they had in this manual. I paid $250 for it brand new. And I have about 400+ rounds dated 1989 on the tags that are loaded with 125 grain Remington JHP bullets. I've fired about 100 of them over the years. The other day I ran six by my chrony and here is what I got: Colt Python 4" 357 Magnum 125 Grain Remington JHP WW primer Blue Dot 16.3 max load Six shot string: 1544 1534 1570 1564 1572 1570 Average 1559 Deviation 38 FPS and there are very little if any actual overpressure signs. They eject fine, with just my thumb pressure and have a slight bulge at the base. The primers are a bit flattened out, but not more than I've seen factory ammo flattened out. Here is what I suspect. I believe that the investment case stainless steel cylinders on the Model 66 S&W revolvers may have been a problem. Since the walls are a bit thin for a .357 and since they are cast, I would be willing to make a good guess that some folks had a problem with that load that owned those S&W revolvers. I do not believe that a cast Model 28 or the forged Model 27 would be an issue, and I do not believe that the Colt Python would be an issue. However, any thin walled cylinder that was being used for .357 might have found it a bit HOT. I mean do you see my average velocity at 10 feet from the muzzle from a FOUR INCH revolver? And it was a very controllable round because of the light bullet. And did you notice that Alliant (used to be Hercules) is stating this for ONLY the 125 grain bullet. THEY WANT YOU TO AVOID USING THAT BULLET WITH THEIR POWDER because you MIGHT come across that data. As for the 41 magnum being totally removed from the equation? Makes no sense UNLESS Speer or someone else did a whole series of bullets with high Blue Dot loads and folks were having issues with their 41 mags. I don't know. I've never owned a .41 so I couldn't tell you because I've never loaded for it. As it stands, I suspect from the HUMONGOUS flash that accompanies the 16.3 grain load that a good bit of the powder is burning outside of the barrel of my Python. Yet it is EXTREMELY accurate. I work my loads up to the maximum for a particular pistol or revolver and have found that in many cases the older Speer books maximum is actually a maximum. The newer books are not. You can't tell me that 7.8 grains of SR 7625 behind a Remington 185 grain JHP in a .45 is a maximum load. It kicks like a .22 and has absolutely no, zilch, nada signs of pressure at all. I never even checked the speed on that load because it was so anemic. HOWEVER, by going up 2 tenths of a grain, at a time, I was able to get just under 1000 FPS average out of 8.5 grains! And it is quite accurate. I had 10 pounds of the powder lying around and a couple thousand brass and bullets and it didn't make sense to use another powder if I could make a load that would work. My only major gripe was that in an 8 shot string I had one 832 FPS load and a 1004 FPS load which made the spread 172 FPS! I was shooting at 50 feet and still kept the group in a 3" circle. The 8.5 grain load shows absolutely ZERO signs of pressure build up. The first thing everyone would see is the totally flattened primers and if you have a ported and polished .45 you will see the brass bulging into the ramp like they do on those old Mac 10 semi auto pistols with just normal loads.
Courageouslion is offline   Reply With Quote