Originally Posted by certifiedfunds
I didn't say it did. The other side of this argument wants to reject that possibility.
So that you know where I'm coming from. I think people who accept a literal interpretation of Biblical creation are fools.
Yes, thank you. Your original post made it read as though you were in the "if science can't explain it, God did it" camp, to me at least.
I apologize if I was reading too much into your posts.
I don't want to reject any premise, actively. I just think it's foolish to give credence to any theory that has absolutely zero physical evidence to back it up.