Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc
|
Done.
Quote:
Then read this thread again.
consider it, and respond after.
|
I see, you can't be bothered to read a whole post but I'm supposed to read whole threads to find your supposed evidence. However, being an affable sort, I've done so and I still see no examples of the argument you claim to be so common. In fact, it seems multiple posters in that thread explicitly reject such an argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syclone538
Rejecting the idea of a god has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution shouldn't lead people to doubt there is a god, the complete lack of evidence for a god should lead people to doubt there is a god.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gunhaver
Understand that none of this eliminates the possibility of a designer to me. It only contradicts the very detailed accounts of what kind of designer was involved by those that are sure they know Him to exist.
|
The closest example appears to be English's post where he writes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by English
No. It is two things. The totality of science, not just evolution, should lead people to believe that there is almost certainly not a creator.
|
But it's hard to say where that discussion might have gone given that you chose to descend into condescension and insults rather than attempting a substantive conversation, just as you did in this thread.
__________________
"Pain, or damage, don't end the world. Or despair. Or beatin's. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man, and give some back."
Last edited by Animal Mother; 01-25-2013 at 01:22..
|