Originally Posted by M 7
Unless you can find a procedural flaw in those analyses, it's more than criticism simply for the sake of criticism.
M&S's work is terribly flawed -some would say fatally so- and there is no getting around it. The statistical analysis (which is no more complicated than that found in a college level course in introductory stats) shows that M&S tampered with their data.
Believe whatever you like- matters not one iota to me.
Chill out, brother. I have never read M&S.