View Single Post
Old 02-11-2013, 08:26   #46
Senior Member
Razorsharp's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 285
Blog Entries: 5
Send a message via AIM to Razorsharp
Originally Posted by RussP View Post
Fine, we can go with "extremely rare" if you want. That should be easier for you to defend.
That's the point I was defending, but you took umbrage at that.
At what frequency point do occurrences cross out of "extremely rare"?
Probably at the point when one can google "police, raid, wrong, house" and only one page of results will show, instead of 20 plus pages.
"Extremely rare" is neither disingenuous or dismissive when you admit that even one event is too many, which I did.
I said that JBnTX was being dismissive with his "extremely rare" comment. You made the choice to jump in and challenge my response to JBnTX. If the shoe doesn't fit, don't force it on your foot.
Have you ever talked face to face with someone in law enforcement, in a position of responsibility and authority in the warrant service process, and asked why mistakes happen and what is being done to prevent mistakes?
No, I haven't. That's a good suggestion. I am sure such inquisitions would be welcomed and responded to with polite sincerity. (In case you didn't catch it, that was genuine sarcasm.)
Racism - the political left's McCarthyism.
Razorsharp is offline   Reply With Quote