Originally Posted by RussP
It really is domestic terrorism, an individual whose terrorist activities are directed at elements of our government or population without foreign direction.
In this case, personal revenge is the motivation according to what he wrote. Clear his name and the killing stops is the same as holding hostages wanting to exchange them for something or someone of value. Only the hostage is an element of the executive branch of the State of California, City of Los Angeles and related organizations and agencies.
OK, so if this is domestic terrorism, then why isn't the Fort Hood shooting that happened a few years back domestic terrorism? That's something I don't understand....
Are they just throwing around the word terrorism now?