Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
05-13-2009, 23:21
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3
|
Wtp
I am looking for a Model 20 or 21 frame preferbly gen 2 or 3 but will take a Gen 1 and any parts for the same including slides any condition.
c.d.slater@earthlink.net
Sincerly
|
|
|
05-14-2009, 18:45
|
#2
|
|
Member Me
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: kennesaw GA.
Posts: 9,087
|
don't think that they made a gen 1 for them guns !!!!!
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
05-16-2009, 20:10
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kiln,Ms
Posts: 193
|
SCC, I have a "smooth" 20 flat finish I'll check, but I think its a Gen 1
__________________
You Can't Fix Stupid !
Certified Glock Nut !
NRA, GSSF, SMGA, MS Glockers #131,
RimFire #3829, Bull Dawg Club #131
MSGunowners.com
|
|
|
05-18-2009, 14:01
|
#4
|
|
Lifetime Membership
* * * *
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 7,781
|
SCC is right guys. G-20s and G-21s came out after the transition to Gen 2. The earliest 20s and 21s will have the "grenade grip" without finger grooves or rails. All of my 20s and 21s are of this early type, but they're not Gen 1s.
Last edited by MakeMineA10mm; 05-19-2009 at 22:59..
|
|
|
06-01-2009, 22:20
|
#5
|
|
Silver Membership
FF/Paramedic
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MakeMineA10mm
SCC is right guys. G-20s and G-21s came out after the transition to Gen 2. The earliest 20s and 21s will have the "grenade grip" without finger grooves or rails. All of my 20s and 21s are of this early type, but they're not Gen 1s.
|
This is where I get confused. Why would the first 21's that came out not be called gen 1 21's? Thats what they are right? when they added the rail or updated it, wouldn't that make that a gen 2? I know that the frames are what dictates generation, but since all glocks were not introduced at the same time, there are different generation variants between models.
Sorry to hijack your thread Slater. Welcome to GT! BTW, you might have better luck in the classifieds forum.
__________________
Next to creating a life, the finest thing a man can do is save one. - Abraham Lincoln
Last edited by DGreno; 06-01-2009 at 22:27..
|
|
|
06-09-2009, 17:31
|
#6
|
|
Original "G"
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 822
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGreno
This is where I get confused. Why would the first 21's that came out not be called gen 1 21's? Thats what they are right? when they added the rail or updated it, wouldn't that make that a gen 2? I know that the frames are what dictates generation, but since all glocks were not introduced at the same time, there are different generation variants between models.
Sorry to hijack your thread Slater. Welcome to GT! BTW, you might have better luck in the classifieds forum.
|
Simply because the Glock frame generations by model are confusing enough as it is!
__________________
USMCR 1997 - 2004
PAARNG 2011 - Present
Founder - Glock Collectors Club PA Glocker #39
Looking for G22 PE389US
Multiple Armorer Certifications
|
|
|
06-09-2009, 20:01
|
#7
|
|
Lifetime Membership
* * * *
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 7,781
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGreno
This is where I get confused. Why would the first 21's that came out not be called gen 1 21's? Thats what they are right? when they added the rail or updated it, wouldn't that make that a gen 2? I know that the frames are what dictates generation, but since all glocks were not introduced at the same time, there are different generation variants between models.
Sorry to hijack your thread Slater. Welcome to GT! BTW, you might have better luck in the classifieds forum.
|
I think it follows that the Glock Frame generations were (with a couple notable exceptions) the same across all models at the same time. In other words, for the years that Gen 1 frames existed all of the models made during that period had the same frame. Likewise with Gen 2, Gen 3, etc.
In other words, the generation of frame has to do with the design that Glock was running with for all of its models at the time.
Still, there are transition models and some models that have variations anyway. Confusing? Yes, a little. The problem is it REALLY gets confusing when everyone isn't singing from the same sheet of music, and uses different terminology. Can also result in the OP getting something he's not really looking for, and then he'd be unhappy, so that why I felt a little clarification would be helpful.
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21.
|
|
|