[EL COLONEL]

....................Bushnell 3200 fire fly 3x0x50 or Leupold vxll 3x9x50? Thanx..

[Patrick Graham]

Originally Posted by EL COLONEL

....................Bushnell 3200 fire fly 3x0x50 or Leupold vxll 3x9x50? Thanx..

I've got the Leupold VXII 3x9 50mm. I've had it for about 20 years and it's has seen quite a bit of use. It's a decent scope but I would be interested in hearing about the Bushnell.

[EL COLONEL]

That was a type-o 3x9x50 for both

[msinc]

Many people are saying that Leupold has issues these days. I have several including a 3X9-40 VXII...never had a minutes trouble. They have fantastic customer service and fast turnaround. I once slipped on some rocks with my Mark 4 M1 10x and damaged it. Even though I am not the original purchaser and it was my own fault they still fixed it no charge {Mark 4 Ultra series are guaranteed for life to whoever owns it at the time.} All the complaining some guys are doing may not all be unfounded but I haven't seen it. I do agree they should have been offered mil/mil FFP scopes and also should be offering to convert older mil/moa turrets for owners. As far as Redfield...they are in bussiness, out,back in, out.....not for me.

[EL COLONEL]

So which is better 3200 fire fly or leupold vxll

[msinc]

Of those two the Leupold VXII. Personally I would take a Nikon Monarch over either one easily.

[EL COLONEL]

Anyone else ?

[EL COLONEL]

mmmmmmm.........................................