GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-2010, 09:11   #1
SiGlockBoy
Senior Member
 
SiGlockBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
Glock 36 Issues Continued....Report

I'm the one who bought a Glocktalks members 2008 G36 that had issues. He ran it through Glock several times and still issues. After his complete frustration with the problem, I purchased the troubled Glock and decided to run my own tests for pure pleasure to see why my favorite firearms company could find no wrong.

The tests and report of the whole escapade are located on http://g36mf.blogspot.com/

Feel free to read the history and new report and create some good clean discussions on the subject. I will try to field some questions as I have time and hopefully some of the very intelligent folks on GT can bring some more light to this problematic issue with some G36 and now the new Gen4 versions starting to crop up.

I will not answer or get involved in any non-constructive side topics and only plead to everyone to keep it clean and positive so this can help others. I did experience problems like Chris and others I had try did too. So it wasn't the old Limp Wrist that everyone wants to throw out.

I've been shooting Glocks since they came to the US and continue to carry one daily. I fully trust them and appreciate them for what they are. I don't stick my head in the sand though and deny a Friday or bad supplier doesn't get into the mix every now and again.

Thanks and I hope it this will lead somewhere eventually to help the ones with problems. The G36 is a fine gun with a very important role. Unfortunately nothing is perfect.

Thanks
John

Last edited by SiGlockBoy; 06-02-2010 at 09:13..
SiGlockBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 10:28   #2
cigarlover
Senior Member
 
cigarlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 172
Being in the manufacturing business I know first hand what can go wrong and how .001 of an inch can affect the fit and function of a product. We all love Glock and know how good they are. Without stirring a hornets nest by saying yes they should halt the production of the 36 and go back and take quailty specs on all parts on the pistol. But do you have a set of digital mics you can take measurements of barrel throat- frame rails and overall demensions of various function parts of pistol ? Then compare them with a 36 that functions with no issues? Mabey start out there and start working through some issues with form of parts to get to function issues...Good luck and keep us posted
cigarlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 14:42   #3
Jim S.
Senior Member
 
Jim S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 4,749
What, if any parts have you changed?
What were the results?
I've never had any malfunctions with my 36. I put a Wolff non captured rod and stock weight spring in it after approximately 500 rounds.
It has gone through many rounds after that. Stock other than the Wolff rod and a Wolff stock weight service pack.
What does the extractor hook look like?
Is it polished smooth or is it "sharp"?
I'll wait to ask more.
__________________
The Evil Captain Kirk
Jim S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 15:15   #4
1SGMP
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Boston,Mass
Posts: 488
Hi
I have had my G-36 for 2 years now without ANY problems/malfunctions. I typically feed it all kinds of ammo, as I do with all my new weapons. I load several magazines with ball, Hollow point and soft point ammo to test reliability. So far my G-36 has been flawless.
Hope this Helps
1SG
1SGMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 18:46   #5
SiGlockBoy
Senior Member
 
SiGlockBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
Cigarlover - Yes, I have digital calipers and mics and have a 36 that functions. So checking all the data between the 2 is possible and I thought about doing that too. Would love to have the blueprints of the G36 to bump against.

Jim S. - Only part changed after the last factory visit from Chris was the slide stop as it was bent inwards per pics in report. All parts met Glock specs per Glock smiths both times it went in. If the recoil assembly is the culrit being too strong, I could see the wolf version possibly correcting that issue.

1sgmp - I am glad you got a good one as many are. I have one that is fine and this one that hiccups very consistently at 4% with most target type ammo. Future tests will determine if the more powerful defense ammo makes it run better. It didn't cause any issues for Chris. That's why I still suspect the recoil assembly.
SiGlockBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 19:15   #6
bentbiker
NRA Member
 
bentbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 4,552
I'm wondering whether there is any chance of the following. The empty case, still held by the extractor comes rearward with the slide until the rim of the case strikes the mouth of the next cartridge in the mag. When it catches enough, this bounces the rear of the empty case upward and out from under the extractor. The empty case thus never hits the ejector, the slide fully cycles and picks the next cartridge from the mag -- JAM.

This scenario might even explain why the problem shows up most frequently when the pressure on the cartridges in the mag is at its highest. Would have been interesting to see the failures with 6+1 (cycling with a full mag).

To test, you could put a bit of fingernail polish on the top surface of the top round in a full mag, chamber a round from a different mag, swap mags to put in the "painted" one, vigorously hand cycle the slide to the rear without allowing it to come forward, and lock the slide back. Now inspect the polish on the next cartridge to see if the case mouth was hit.

Worth a try?
bentbiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2010, 19:45   #7
SiGlockBoy
Senior Member
 
SiGlockBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
bentbiker - while testing with dummy rounds, you can see that happen. The back of the rim while extracting does catch the case neck on the fresh cartridge in the mag.

The G36 has the flatest angle to the mag feed of all the glocks I've owned and seen. That along with the wobble in the magwell allows your pinky to move the mag bottom rearward dropping the front of the mag and only makes the angle to feed less. I believe this makes the problem intensify.

Hotter ammo must push past this issue as it doesn't seem to happen then. Nor does it happen every round. With only 4 FTEs per 100rds, it is only lightly doing it at best.

But I agree that it is a possible issue. That's where the cardboard behind the mag in between it and the magwell has been claimed to solve the issue. Haven't tried it yet.

Last edited by SiGlockBoy; 06-02-2010 at 19:46..
SiGlockBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 04:08   #8
DLL9mm
Senior Member
 
DLL9mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MICHIGAN
Posts: 2,629
I was having the exact same issues with my G36 as mentioned. I replaced the extractor and bearing with the older Non-LCI versions and the problems went away completly. Give it a try.
__________________
*G19*G26*
*etc*etc*etc*
DLL9mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 10:47   #9
saltydog452
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLL9mm View Post
I was having the exact same issues with my G36 as mentioned. I replaced the extractor and bearing with the older Non-LCI versions and the problems went away completly. Give it a try.
What is Non-LCI?... how is it different from other extractiors?

Thanks,

salty
saltydog452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 11:17   #10
vafish
Senior Member
 
vafish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Commonwealth of Virginia
Posts: 23,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltydog452 View Post
What is Non-LCI?... how is it different from other extractiors?

Thanks,

salty

LCI = Loaded Chamber Indicator
__________________
"If your plan is for one year, plant rice.
If your plan is for ten years, plant trees.
If your plan is for one hundred years,
educate children." -- Confucius
vafish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 19:20   #11
Lockback
Polymerlicious!
 
Lockback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLL9mm View Post
I was having the exact same issues with my G36 as mentioned. I replaced the extractor and bearing with the older Non-LCI versions and the problems went away completley. Give it a try.
I have the older non-LCI version and have never had any issues whatsoever.
Lockback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 10:01   #12
SiGlockBoy
Senior Member
 
SiGlockBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
DLL9mm - I have read similar on this issue and have not tested so far. One I also read was that the SLB of the older or a different model<21 or 30??> had a different over all length that helped the extractor overcome this issue.

Both mine are the same. If you get a chance, please try the old SLB and newer LCI extractor and see if it still produces good results. That could help narrow to the spring/bearing combo or the extractor itself.

I remember Chris saying the extractor had been changed out once by Glock in one of the returns.

I believe the 36 has the olive SLB setup.
SiGlockBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 10:09   #13
voyager4520
-----
 
voyager4520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SE Colorado
Posts: 8,518
Is there any noticeable difference in how high each magazine sits in each frame?
__________________
G23 G27
voyager4520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 12:46   #14
saltydog452
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 269
Thanks.

sd
saltydog452 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2010, 14:47   #15
SiGlockBoy
Senior Member
 
SiGlockBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 264
Voyager4520 - No noticeable difference in ride height. Main difference in the 36 from othe glocks is how flat the feed angle to the chamber is. Most glocks have a good angel to start the next cartridge into the chamber. The G36 is about flat and make a jump to the chamber. When you place your pinky against the mag bottom, it pushes it back and hence makes the front top of mag pull down a little more. This only flattens out the angle that much more. This tends to let the rim of the fired case catch the neck of the next round in the mag. THis either causes it to pull out of the extractor premature and not eject properly or something odd.
SiGlockBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 16:52   #16
Jim S.
Senior Member
 
Jim S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 4,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by SiGlockBoy View Post
When you place your pinky against the mag bottom, it pushes it back and hence makes the front top of mag pull down a little more. This only flattens out the angle that much more. This tends to let the rim of the fired case catch the neck of the next round in the mag. THis either causes it to pull out of the extractor premature and not eject properly or something odd.
I do not place my "pinky" on the magazine but actually I place it under the base plate.
Much more comfortable for my large hands.
I too noticed that the magazine could be influenced by pulling on it with your little finger and I thought that it could cause feed problems.
It would be interesting to see if there are any problems with this gun after altering how it is held.
__________________
The Evil Captain Kirk
Jim S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 08:45   #17
highfructosecornsyrp
Senior Member
 
highfructosecornsyrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 559
anyone know what happened to this? Was there any solution found?
highfructosecornsyrp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 09:11   #18
voyager4520
-----
 
voyager4520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SE Colorado
Posts: 8,518
Knowing what I know now, I suspect the problem was that the extractor wasn't moving freely enough or for whatever other reason wasn't holding the rim of the casing to the breech face, which allowed the casing to drop lower, and the rim of the casing was impacting the case mouth of the top round in the magazine. Then the extractor came off of the rim, leading to a failure to extract. The problem may have occurred less with "self defense" loads because many of those loads have a bevelled case mouth.

That's just a guess though, I'd have to look at the spent casings from that gun to see if that was indeed the problem. The spent casings from my G27 showed that the extractor wasn't firmly holding the rim of the casing to the breech face, so the casing was dropping lower in the gun. A new extractor and the new 28926 ejector fixed the problem in that gun.
__________________
G23 G27

Last edited by voyager4520; 02-27-2012 at 09:13..
voyager4520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 09:22   #19
highfructosecornsyrp
Senior Member
 
highfructosecornsyrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by voyager4520 View Post
Knowing what I know now, I suspect the problem was that the extractor wasn't moving freely enough or for whatever other reason wasn't holding the rim of the casing to the breech face, which allowed the casing to drop lower, and the rim of the casing was impacting the case mouth of the top round in the magazine. Then the extractor came off of the rim, leading to a failure to extract. The problem may have occurred less with "self defense" loads because many of those loads have a bevelled case mouth.

That's just a guess though, I'd have to look at the spent casings from that gun to see if that was indeed the problem. The spent casings from my G27 showed that the extractor wasn't firmly holding the rim of the casing to the breech face, so the casing was dropping lower in the gun. A new extractor and the new 28926 ejector fixed the problem in that gun.
That is kind of interesting. My gen 3 glock 19 was doing the same thing...we'll see if my new 36 does as well...

Thanks for the post!
highfructosecornsyrp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 20:57   #20
Slug71
Senior Member
 
Slug71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oregon - U.S.A
Posts: 4,210
Pos.....
__________________
GSSF Member
Bull Dawgs Club #571
Rimfire Club #571
Slug71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 15:51   #21
tuica
Senior Member
 
tuica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Portland,Oregon
Posts: 1,831
The only probs. I had with my G36 (2009 mod.) was with old magazines - and attendent followers. These would hold the slide back with such efficiency that it was difficult to release it using the slide stop. When I updated the follower to the newer type (those who know the 36 will know what I mean), the problem vanished. My G36 continues to be my main CCW. And I use Pearce +0 extensions on all mags, with no problems. Good luck with yours.
__________________
Tuica: NRA Certified Instructor; Oregon CHL Instructor; GMG2 - US Navy 1976-1980. USS Coral Sea, 1977-1980. Forward Deployed - The Gulf.

Last edited by tuica; 02-29-2012 at 16:16..
tuica is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 16:16   #22
Bruce M
Senior Member
 
Bruce M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S FL
Posts: 20,020
Sometimes I wonder if G36 issues are part of a reason as to why there are no other Glock single stack pistols.
__________________
Bruce
I never talked to anyone who had to fire their gun who said "I wished I had the smaller gun and fewer rounds with me" Just because you find a hundred people who agree with you on the internet does not mean you're right.
Bruce M is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 16:53   #23
WinterWizard
Senior Member
 
WinterWizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,296
I have a G36 with about 600 rounds so far, 10 different brands of ammo, zero malfunctions.
WinterWizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2012, 17:23   #24
dawgchamp
Senior Member
 
dawgchamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by WinterWizard View Post
I have a G36 with about 600 rounds so far, 10 different brands of ammo, zero malfunctions.
Ten different actual brands, or ten different brand/weights/bullet types?

Last edited by dawgchamp; 02-29-2012 at 17:23..
dawgchamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2012, 09:11   #25
WinterWizard
Senior Member
 
WinterWizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by dawgchamp View Post
Ten different actual brands, or ten different brand/weights/bullet types?
Ten different brands. Federal (Champion and American Eagle), Cor-Bon (regular JHP and Pow'R Ball), Hornady, PMC, S&B, Fiocchi, Speer, Winchester, Magtech, Remington.

And I have shot the Cor-Bon, Hornady and Speer in different weights as well.

So, ten different brands, ranging from FMJ to hollow point to +P. Zero malfunctions.

Last edited by WinterWizard; 03-01-2012 at 09:16..
WinterWizard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
fte, ftf, g36, glock 36
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:47.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,375
447 Members
928 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42