[Cavalry Doc]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html


If this proves to be true, it may be the beginning of the end for Barry, maybe even Hillary.

[Goaltender66]

And we are hearing about this from a foreign newspaper because...?

Oh yes, because as far as the American media is concerned, the story here is about Romney's gaaaaafes.

[countrygun]

Originally Posted by Goaltender66

And we are hearing about this from a foreign newspaper because...?

Oh yes, because as far as the American media is concerned, the story here is about Romney's gaaaaafes.

Which do you think is more important to the media, whether the deaths of Americans could have been prevented, or the look on Romney's face in a picture?

Fracking liberals. I am having a hard time finding the line between an American Liberal and a Muslim extremist.

[jeager]

Treason by incompetence.

This is not the first State Department
employee to die under the HildeBeasts' Reign.

A Dept of Agriculture advisor
was killed in Afghanistan a couple months ago.

[QNman]

Marked for interest...

[Flintlocker]

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html


If this proves to be true, it may be the beginning of the end for Barry, maybe even Hillary.

You do realize that your source is a newspaper that is owned and operated by an ex-KGB agent, don't you?

Here he is with your buddy in 2002:

[countrygun]

Originally Posted by Flintlocker

You do realize that your source is a newspaper that is owned and operated by an ex-KGB agent, don't you?

Here he is with your buddy in 2002:

You mean the owner of the paper has a higher security clearance than the POTUS?

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by Flintlocker

You do realize that your source is a newspaper that is owned and operated by an ex-KGB agent, don't you?

Here he is with your buddy in 2002:

Then why aren't they producing pro-Obama puff pieces?

You're implied theory is kinda inconsistent, isn't it?



Quick, who is the editor in chief?

[427]

Originally Posted by Flintlocker

You do realize that your source is a newspaper that is owned and operated by an ex-KGB agent, don't you?

Here he is with your buddy in 2002:

You do realize that you support Obama, a candidate who's endorsed by the Communist Party, don't you?

[countrygun]

Originally Posted by 427

You do realize that you support Obama, a candidate who's endorsed by the Communist Party, don't you?

He'd bet his "Che" t-shirt on it.

[Fed Five Oh]

Originally Posted by Flintlocker

You do realize that your source is a newspaper that is owned and operated by an ex-KGB agent, don't you?

You do realize one of the murdered told his online gamer friends that something was amiss, right?

Trying to figure out how you look in the mirror. I'm betting you are studying to be a lawyer.

[QNman]

Originally Posted by Flintlocker

You do realize that your source is a newspaper that is owned and operated by an ex-KGB agent, don't you?

Here he is with your buddy in 2002:

So does this photo mean the White House is owned by an ex-KGB agent too?

[happyguy]

Originally Posted by Flintlocker

You do realize that your source is a newspaper that is owned and operated by an ex-KGB agent, don't you?

Here he is with your buddy in 2002:

Another communist news source (CNN) is also reporting that Libyan officials warned us of the attack three days before it occured.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/...html?hpt=hp_t2

Regards,
Happyguy

[Flintlocker]

Originally Posted by happyguy

Another communist news source (CNN) is also reporting that Libyan officials warned us of the attack three days before it occured.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/...html?hpt=hp_t2

Regards,
Happyguy

Apparently your reading comprehension skills are lacking. From the article:

He said they told the diplomats that the security situation wasn't good for international business.

He did not, as you say, "warn us of the attack three days before it occurred."

[happyguy]

Originally Posted by Flintlocker

Apparently your reading comprehension skills are lacking. From the article:




He did not, as you say, "warn us of the attack three days before it occurred."

You left out this part:

Three days before the deadly assault on the United States consulate in Libya, a local security official says he met with American diplomats in the city and warned them about deteriorating security.

"The situation is frightening, it scares us," Mabrouk said they told the U.S. officials. He did not say how they responded.

Mabrouk said it was not the first time he has warned foreigners about the worsening security situation in the face of the growing presence of armed jihadist groups in the Benghazi area.

Nice try Bucko!

Actually reading comphrehension and critical thinking implies the ability to draw conclusions and make inferences from the material you have read.

Taken along with the approaching anniversary of 9/11 the obvious response should be to be on your toes and maybe add a little extra security.

It is true that there is a lot of bad and irrelevant intel and picking out the important bits is very difficult but...

Context is everything.

9/11 provides the context.

Regards,
Happyguy

[Flintlocker]

Originally Posted by happyguy

You left out this part:



Nice try Bucko!

Actually reading comphrehension and critical thinking implies the ability to draw conclusions and make inferences from the material you have read.

Taken along with the approaching anniversary of 9/11 the obvious response should be to be on your toes and maybe add a little extra security.

It is true that there is a lot of bad and irrelevant intel and picking out the important bits is very difficult but...

Context is everything.

9/11 provides the context.

Regards,
Happyguy

So what you've decided to double down on are statements that fail to support your initial statement that "Libyan officials warned us of the attack three days before it occurred." Nothing in that statement supports the message that you desperately seem to want to be reality.

I have to wonder.. what the **** passes for logic in your bubble?

[kirgi08]

tagged.

[kirgi08]

[sheriff733]

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html


If this proves to be true, it may be the beginning of the end for Barry, maybe even Hillary.

I can't imagine the situation that would be the beginning of the end for Barry.

This is nowhere close. The people that vote for him could care less about such issues.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine

[Brucev]

Originally Posted by sheriff733

I can't imagine the situation that would be the beginning of the end for Barry.

This is nowhere close. The people that vote for him could care less about such issues.


Outdoor Hub mobile, the outdoor information engine

Correct. The only people who could vote for the demokrat mancurian candidate are those persons who hate America. There is no other possible rational.

[DOC44]

Looks like and smells like obama and his political thugs are trying to throw the game.

Doc44

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by article

Some of the missing papers from the consulate are said to list names of Libyans who are working with Americans, putting them potentially at risk from extremist groups, while some of the other documents are said to relate to oil contracts.

So the real story is these papers contained names of Libyan CIA assets that have been working with the State Dept and those papers had to "disappear" before they discovered by the attackers.

What this article is really saying is that the State Dept knew the attacks were coming but didn't mind sacrificing a few diplomats. Why? Because the CIA and State Dept helped organize the attacks. The same mercenaries they brought into Libya in the first place to destabilize the Libyan gov't.

Senior officials are increasingly convinced, however, that the ferocious nature of the Benghazi attack, in which rocket-propelled grenades were used, indicated it was not the result of spontaneous anger due to the video, called Innocence of Muslims. Patrick Kennedy, Under-Secretary at the State Department, said he was convinced the assault was planned due to its extensive nature and the proliferation of weapons.

At least someone has the balls to say the video excuse is bs, though he omits that the weapons and training he speaks of were supplied by western intelligence in the first place.

[Bren]

Originally Posted by Fed Five Oh

You do realize one of the murdered told his online gamer friends that something was amiss, right?

Trying to figure out how you look in the mirror. I'm betting you are studying to be a lawyer.

I admit, it takes a lot less to get through law school than some might imagine, but unless flintlocker is playing a fictional character here, I am confident he doesn't have what it does take.

[Cavalry Doc]

Originally Posted by G19G20

So the real story is these papers contained names of Libyan CIA assets that have been working with the State Dept and those papers had to "disappear" before they discovered by the attackers.

What this article is really saying is that the State Dept knew the attacks were coming but didn't mind sacrificing a few diplomats. Why? Because the CIA and State Dept helped organize the attacks. The same mercenaries they brought into Libya in the first place to destabilize the Libyan gov't.



At least someone has the balls to say the video excuse is bs, though he omits that the weapons and training he speaks of were supplied by western intelligence in the first place.

Your imagination and penchant to blame America first collide and end in a very illustrative conspiracy theory quite often.

"excercising your freedoms" too often can rewire your brain and commonly leads to paranoia. Cut back some.


What the article is actually saying isn't in a secret code that only you and some of your like minded colleagues can decipher.

[G19G20]

Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc

Your imagination and penchant to blame America first collide and end in a very illustrative conspiracy theory quite often.

"excercising your freedoms" too often can rewire your brain and commonly leads to paranoia. Cut back some.


What the article is actually saying isn't in a secret code that only you and some of your like minded colleagues can decipher.

You're right. It's not a secret to anyone that does research further than the latest Fox News broadcast or the latest GTPI echo chamber slogans and misinformation.

Your lack of education, research and extremely narrow worldview isn't my fault. Only you can fix that. Horse to water and all that. I find your refusal to EVER acknowledge our foreign policy faults just as delusional as you think my wide worldview may be.

What exactly do you think the CIA does around the world???? Overthrowing foreign governments, fomenting violence to further fascist imperial goals, recruiting and supplying mercenaries, etc is their JOB DESCRIPTION.