Glock Talk Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
 |
|
09-25-2012, 18:33
|
#1
|
|
Lifetime Membership
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 19,708
|
First gay marriage, now polygamy; what next?
For those who denied the presence of a slippery slope, I give you:
http://www.volokh.com/2012/09/25/pro...inority-group/
Prosecutor’s Policy: We Won’t Enforce Polygamy Ban, Because of a Concern About Religious Minority Group
So says a County Attorney’s declaration filed on May 22, 2012 in a federal case challenging the polygamy ban on constitutional grounds...
__________________
"To spit on your hands and lower the pike; to stand fast over the body of Leonidas the King; to be rear guard at Kunu-Ri; to stand and be still to the Birkenhead Drill; these are not rational acts. They are often merely necessary." Pournelle
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 18:39
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 3,033
|
I'm not against either. Why have such laws?
.
__________________
.
Information is not knowledge-Albert Einstein
.
Last edited by NMG26; 09-25-2012 at 18:39..
|
|
|
');
document.write(' ');
};
//-->
09-25-2012, 18:41
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMG26
I'm not against either. Why have such laws?
.
|
Yep. +1
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 09:39
|
#4
|
|
Searching ...
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: On the move ... again!
Posts: 1,840
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMG26
I'm not against either. Why have such laws? .
|
That is a great question!
Here is one problematic view of polygamy issue:
A person can marry several wives and they all can be on the system as none of them "have" to work (making a great number to set benefit amounts). Let's use a family of six as an example (hubby and his five wives). It would make that sixteen people to draw off your taxes by the act of polygamy if they just decide to have two kids per wife.
Sound good? Not to me.
EDIT: I see I got beat to the punch, good post gunnut 45
Last edited by SPIN2010; 09-26-2012 at 09:40..
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 09:49
|
#5
|
|
Feral human
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cul Va
Posts: 13,051
|
Why is that different than a piece of crap in the trailer park who gets a bunch of women pregnant and they all are on welfare RIGHT NOW?
If you are saying you don't want MORE people on that system, then ok, I get that. But I don't see how making polygamy illegal accomplishes that. The women are just as pregnant and on govt assistance whether they are married or not. I think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPIN2010
That is a great question!
Here is one problematic view of polygamy issue:
A person can marry several wives and they all can be on the system as none of them "have" to work (making a great number to set benefit amounts). Let's use a family of six as an example (hubby and his five wives). It would make that sixteen people to draw off your taxes by the act of polygamy if they just decide to have two kids per wife.
Sound good? Not to me.
EDIT: I see I got beat to the punch, good post gunnut 45
|
__________________
"Rats aren't creepy, experimenting on them IS." Emilie Autumn.
For too long people have said "screw NY, IL, etc" or "that'll never happen here." Yes, it will eventually. If we dont start standing up together now, it will never stop.-ilgunguygt
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 10:19
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,687
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPIN2010
That is a great question!
Here is one problematic view of polygamy issue:
A person can marry several wives and they all can be on the system as none of them "have" to work (making a great number to set benefit amounts). Let's use a family of six as an example (hubby and his five wives). It would make that sixteen people to draw off your taxes by the act of polygamy if they just decide to have two kids per wife.
Sound good? Not to me.
EDIT: I see I got beat to the punch, good post gunnut 45
|
So these people wouldn't exist or "draw off my taxes" if it wasn't for polygamy? What is it about them being married that suddenly makes me have to pay for it?
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 19:42
|
#7
|
|
Anti-Federalist
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,585
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMG26
I'm not against either. Why have such laws?
.
|
WHAT ?!?! POLYGAMY AND HOMOSEXUALITY?!@#!
__________________
If you don't pay taxes, you shouldn't vote.
"A tax loophole is something that benefits the other guy. If it benefits you, it's called a tax reform"
When Obama raises your boss's taxes, and you lose your job, how does that make you better off?
|
|
|
09-26-2012, 19:44
|
#8
|
|
Massive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,662
|
First gay marriage, now polygamy; what next?
Dogs and cats living together!!!!!
Randy
|
|
|
09-28-2012, 10:00
|
#9
|
|
Gone Shooting!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,861
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NMG26
I'm not against either. Why have such laws?
|
Another +1 here!
__________________
www.ShooterReady.US
" For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." — Stuart Chase
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 18:44
|
#10
|
|
In the Oranges
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Joaquin Valley
Posts: 6,045
|
Sounds good to me. There is a clear line at "consenting adults" that we can slide all the way down to as far as I'm concerned. Or just remove the slope altogether by removing government from the marriage business.
It's not like those who practice polygamy are suddenly going to stop living as a family just because they can't legally marry. It's just another useless, ineffective law meant to make a certain group feel important by imposing their morality on others.
__________________
-HarlDane-
"Son of the San Joaquin"
The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly. A. Einstein
Last edited by HarlDane; 09-25-2012 at 18:46..
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 19:30
|
#11
|
|
Massive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,662
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Spade
For those who denied the presence of a slippery slope, I give you:
http://www.volokh.com/2012/09/25/pro...inority-group/
Prosecutor’s Policy: We Won’t Enforce Polygamy Ban, Because of a Concern About Religious Minority Group
So says a County Attorney’s declaration filed on May 22, 2012 in a federal case challenging the polygamy ban on constitutional grounds...
|
Wasn't polygamy part of the Mormon faith at one point? They've got as much of an argument on religious grounds as the guys that smoke peyote as part of their religion. I'd say they've got a stronger case on those grounds than the gay marriage folks.
The gay marriage folks just have "none of your damn business" going for them. Its really the opposite, the main opposition is based on the majority's religious edicts forbidding it and seeking to enforce that on them. The polygamists at least are on constitutionally equal footing if they can really convince the courts to cut them slack on religious grounds.
There's that same thing going against the Mormon polygamists too, about the majority religion trying to enforce its rules on others, but at least they've got some First Amendment juice on their side.
Randy
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 19:35
|
#12
|
|
Dapper Dan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NW IN
Posts: 5,748
|
Who cares about polygamy? Seriously? How can you make yourself care what other people want their family to be?
I care about polygamy waaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyy less than I care about gay marriage. And I care absolutely zero about gay marriage.
A billion people are married and cheat on their spouse....it's a jerk move but no one wants it to be illegal. Why is it illegal for a group of people to be fine with what's already legal?
It's only legal for people to be polyamorous if most of the people involved are pissed and hurt about it? But if they're all A-OK then it's a crime? Sounds logical.
__________________
YOU FORGOT YOUR BRIEFCASE!!!
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 19:38
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 329
|
Any dude that can deal with more than one woman deserves what he gets!
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 19:42
|
#14
|
|
Platinum Membership
NRA
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: minnesota
Posts: 13,076
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaR6
Any dude that can deal with more than one woman deserves what he gets!
|
The truth is strong with this one!
__________________
janice6
"Peace is that brief, glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". Anonymous
Earp: Not everyone who knows you hates you.
DOC: I know it ain't always easy bein' my friend....but I'll BE THERE when you need me.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:11
|
#15
|
|
Massive Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 10,662
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlantaR6
Any dude that can deal with more than one woman deserves what he gets!
|
So if polygamy is having one wife too many, what's the difference between that and regular marriage???
Randy
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 19:51
|
#16
|
|
CLM Number 293
Disirregardless
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 9,243
|
I think this is the first time I've ever opened a GT thread and saw so many rational posts. I approve.
__________________
"Turns oit i had irrisputable proof i was out of the country" - youngdocglock
"I don't need to figure probabilities, and I don't need facts." - JBnTx
"Maybe they should drink like Woofie and come up with pure brilliance." - OXCOPS
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 22:04
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,683
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Woofie
I think this is the first time I've ever opened a GT thread and saw so many rational posts. I approve.
|
Ditto.
Btw, there *is* a slippery slope to be afraid of, but it's the one that looks more like George Orwell at the bottom than Joseph Smith.
__________________
The West has become a great pity where suicidal lemmings run toward a cliff disguised as a voting booth. - James Miller
Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. - Sallust
Last edited by Chronos; 09-25-2012 at 22:21..
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 19:56
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tampa
Posts: 847
|
Get the government out of marriage. It's none of their business.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:04
|
#19
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 3,033
|
What is next?
Cross-polygamy...."This is my husband Bob, and this is my wife Jane, the three of us are married."
.
__________________
.
Information is not knowledge-Albert Einstein
.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:08
|
#20
|
|
1-man flash mob
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,819
|
None of the government's business.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:18
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,240
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guss
Get the government out of marriage. It's none of their business.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by frank_drebin
None of the government's business.
|
That's impossible. Custody disputes; medical disputes; inheritance; tax filings; regulation of adoption agencies; civil suits against "discriminatory" churches, banquet halls, misc businesses; divorce proceedings.
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:45
|
#22
|
|
In the Oranges
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Joaquin Valley
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAFinch
That's impossible. Custody disputes; medical disputes; inheritance; tax filings; regulation of adoption agencies; civil suits against "discriminatory" churches, banquet halls, misc businesses; divorce proceedings.
|
A simple contract between a couple (or group) covers most of the normal legal issues that arise in creating or dissolving a marriage. As for suits against churches, it's a non-issue; churches currently discriminate with regards to who can be married in their buildings with no problem, legalizing polygamy or gay marriage would do nothing to change that.
__________________
-HarlDane-
"Son of the San Joaquin"
The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly. A. Einstein
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:11
|
#23
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,009
|
There will be no end to it as long as they get to "re-define" marriage. It sure looks like government shouldn't be involved AT ALL!
My opposition to homosexual "marriage" is largely because a homosexual couple will raise children with a warped sense of relationships between the sexes. Now.... if children weren't involved then who really cares?
__________________
"Arm yourself, arm a friend!"
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:36
|
#24
|
|
In the Oranges
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Joaquin Valley
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDDL-UP
My opposition to homosexual "marriage" is largely because a homosexual couple will raise children with a warped sense of relationships between the sexes. Now.... if children weren't involved then who really cares?
|
But outlawing gay marriage does absolutely nothing to prevent gays from having and raising children.
Quite trying to rationalize it and just come clean with yourself, you oppose gay marriage because you don't approve of homosexuality and you want the government to support your beliefs.
__________________
-HarlDane-
"Son of the San Joaquin"
The mediocre mind is incapable of understanding the man who refuses to bow blindly to conventional prejudices and chooses instead to express his opinions courageously and honestly. A. Einstein
|
|
|
09-25-2012, 20:42
|
#25
|
|
CLM Number 293
Disirregardless
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 9,243
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDDL-UP
There will be no end to it as long as they get to "re-define" marriage. It sure looks like government shouldn't be involved AT ALL!
My opposition to homosexual "marriage" is largely because a homosexual couple will raise children with a warped sense of relationships between the sexes. Now.... if children weren't involved then who really cares?
|
Yeah, them gays raise screwed up kids like this guy.
__________________
"Turns oit i had irrisputable proof i was out of the country" - youngdocglock
"I don't need to figure probabilities, and I don't need facts." - JBnTx
"Maybe they should drink like Woofie and come up with pure brilliance." - OXCOPS
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43.
|
|
|