GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2013, 08:56   #1
vandros
10mm fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: southwest
Posts: 164
Does attaching light negatively affect polymer gun performance?

Hi there! After watching this vid
that shows just how much polymer frame of Glock flexes, I started to wonder how attaching lights might impact gun reliability and performance. I've asked our local gunsmith, and he said that, yes, lights attached to Glock polymer frames can sometimes result in failure to eject or even double feeds.

The metal clamps of my TLR-1 very firmly grab my g29 frame, which without a doubt reduces frame flexing. I wonder what's everyone's experience has been with this? Do you notice any weird behavior in your Glocks when attaching lights to it? Does Glock Co. test their guns with lights attached as extensively as guns without any attachments?
__________________
glock 4 gun; strider 4 knife

Last edited by vandros; 01-21-2013 at 12:30..
vandros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:18   #2
uaengineer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bham, AL
Posts: 148
Well you should put several hundred rounds downrange in your gun with your light installed to ensure it reliably functions. If I'm not mistaken the issue used to be with Gen 3 G22's primarily? My G21 runs flawlessly with a TLR-1s or X300.
uaengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:41   #3
24601
Member
 
24601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 94
when shooting 40 through a gen3 32C with my surefire x300, i noticed an unacceptable amount of FTF...maybe 2 or three per mag....i installed wolf +10% mag springs which helped some....also had to experiment with different RSAs....it's much better now, but i still get a FTF once in a while....but i don't carry 40 for SD or i'd be really hacked...it's just to switch things up at the range when i get bored of 357 or 9.... i mean, i guess i should be hacked to begin with seeing as the gun was designed for an attachment and it isn't working 100% with a light attached, but not every gen3 full frame/compact had that issue....i just got 'lucky'.....
24601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:40   #4
maestrogustav
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 211
My G22gen4 is perfect with 100rds so far.

It was indeed the G22gen3s that were known to have issues.

I would like to know if there is any sign of issues with genes.
maestrogustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 09:45   #5
maestrogustav
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 211
That video is pretty bad; is there no ejector in the gun?

Also I don't get the point of the various numbers of rounds in the mag

Also 24601 what's an acceptable number of FTFs?
maestrogustav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 10:09   #6
vandros
10mm fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: southwest
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by maestrogustav View Post
That video is pretty bad; is there no ejector in the gun?

Also I don't get the point of the various numbers of rounds in the mag

Also 24601 what's an acceptable number of FTFs?
Yes, I think the ejector was taken out. I think the slo mo glock operation in hi def is pretty neat to see. I never thought the frame flexes nearly as much as it actually does in the vid.
__________________
glock 4 gun; strider 4 knife
vandros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 10:21   #7
24601
Member
 
24601's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by maestrogustav View Post
Also 24601 what's an acceptable number of FTFs?

well, i guess my wording was off....FTF shouldn't be acceptable for a carry gun, but I don't carry 40...i use 357....a couple FTF here when i swap out barrels to shoot 40 at the range is fine with me because i gives me extra practice for clearing malfunctions...sometimes i intentionally buy really crappy ammo and head out to the range just for the malfunction practice....so that's what i meant....
24601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 16:14   #8
Bren
NRA Life Member
 
Bren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 33,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by maestrogustav View Post
That video is pretty bad; is there no ejector in the gun?
That's what I was about to post - it has to be missing or broken.

On the Youtube page, the guys says it wouldn't eject because of the adjustment of the ransome rest, but that slide went all the way back without the brass ever touching an ejector, so I think he's wrong.
__________________
If you are not an NRA member, you are not involved in gun rights, so sit down and shut the +%@# up.

Last edited by Bren; 01-23-2013 at 16:19..
Bren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 10:12   #9
Kcolg
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Missouri
Posts: 716
Definately an issue with lights attached. Our Dept. has been working with our regions Glock Rep on the issues. And I know two other Depts. next door have had issues as well. All with Glock .40 both Gen 3 and 4. We have Gen 3's and its not every gun but about half of them. It ejects fine but shoves the next round nose down into the mag causing the slide to either hang up or close with an empty chamber. It's always between rounds 3 and 7 that it does it. One of the other Depts that had the same problems upgraded to Gen 4's for a $50 price difference just over a year ago and now that some of the guns are hitting 500 to 1k rounds they are having the issue again. Glock Rep tried new guide rods and it still failed, put new mag springs in and worked until the 3rd time being loaded then it failed again (may spring had shrunk down like the old ones we swapped out. Glock Rep then opened up a new Gen 4 he had and on the 3rd mag it had a jam with a light. We use Streamlight TLR-1 and 2 and the old M3 and all caused jams. Glock Rep is at a lose and we are debating going to 9mm except for the reports of brass to the face. All work fine with no light. But we've spent a lot of $ on lights and holsters for both street and SRT. At this point Glock says the weight on the end speeds up the slide and it doesn't pick up the next round or violently (their word) shoves it down into the magazine causing a nose down jam.
__________________
Kcolg

Last edited by Kcolg; 01-21-2013 at 10:16..
Kcolg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 11:04   #10
uaengineer
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bham, AL
Posts: 148
Are there any reports out there on this happening with other brands like XD40 or M&P40? Seems like Glock needs to take a look at their RSA for the 40's if they're going to keep the same size and weight profile as the 9mm's and more than likely using universal mag springs. I guess an available quick fix to try is stiffer mag springs at the expense of raping your thumbs when loading your mags or either balance the weight at the back of the gun, but that's not practical unless the dept wants to make 22 round mags standard issue.
uaengineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 15:44   #11
Markel
Member
 
Markel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 61
I have a Glock 35/TLR-1 combo and have 1,250 rounds through it with no problems to date. I just mounted a TLR-2s, so I'll see how it compares since it is a bit heavier than the TLR-1.

Btw, about half of the rounds fired have been .40 S&W and the other half .357 SIG using a KKM barrel.
Markel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2013, 19:37   #12
got_metal
Senior Member
 
got_metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Failifornia
Posts: 413
I was out today with my G22 Gen 3 and TLR-1s, specifically to test the function with the light attached. Shot 80 rounds of .40 and the first 2 rounds of the first mag both failed to feed, the rest fed fine, both slow and rapid fire. Not sure if this was a grip issue in the beginning or not. Also tried the "limp wrist" test with a full mag and it fed fine.

I also shot 80 rounds of 9mm (conversion barrel) with the light attached, no issues.

If it keeps getting a couple fails every range trip, I may try a TRL-3 instead.
got_metal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 07:50   #13
GWG19
Senior Member
 
GWG19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Huntsville Al
Posts: 429
I use a Insight XML. Very small and very light weight. Cost about $40.
I have 3 of them. One was has several 1000 rounds fired with it on different guns. A SA 357 Sig XD, SA 45LE 45 Gap, Colt Rail Gun, Glock 21, Glock 34. It has not affected the functioning any. The weight on this light is closer to the trigger guard than some lights. I have tried different lights and the big thing that I noticed was how muzzle heavy they made the pistol feel. The XML has a slight increase but not much.
If you are using it for home defense or personal defense it should be fine.
__________________
If you’re in a gunfight:
- If you’re not shooting, you should be loading.
- If you’re not loading, you should be moving.
- If you’re not moving, you’re dead.
GWG19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 11:30   #14
Bill Lumberg
BTF Inventor
 
Bill Lumberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,874
Zero problems with glock 23 and 22's, across tens of thousands of rounds, with M3, M3X, and TLR-1's. Using commonly available range and duty rounds. Never enountered at the range, nor talked to any other agency with problems. The TLR-1 is a much higher quality light than the M3's, but none caused any malfunctions for us. That being the case, you still should test fire your weapon with anything you plan to keep attached to it.
__________________
Did someone talk to you about your TPS reports?

Last edited by Bill Lumberg; 01-23-2013 at 11:31..
Bill Lumberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 11:40   #15
FLglockdude
Senior Member
 
FLglockdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 1,750
My M&P9 has been flawless over 2500+ rounds with a TLR-1 mounted.

Sent from my Obama phone.
FLglockdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 15:24   #16
raven11
Senior Member
 
raven11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8,581
My Walther P99 and Caracal F ran fine with a TLR-3 on
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by oISHUTupNrocKIo View Post
He's actually wrong, after 8-9 shots with a 9mm bullet, you actually get a text on your phone saying "You are being shot at by a 9mm, don't worry, just ignore him and walk away."
raven11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 15:37   #17
NDCent
Socially Inept
 
NDCent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ozarks
Posts: 2,236
1000 to 1500 rounds through gen4 G35 with tlr-2, no problems.
__________________
Silvertip® Hollow Points, When You Care Enough To Send The Very Best.
NDCent is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 15:42   #18
concretefuzzynuts
Brew Crew
 
concretefuzzynuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: VB, VA
Posts: 6,096
On a related note: I don't mount lights on my guns. If I'm trying to find out what that bump in the middle of the night was, I don't want to point a weapon at a family member or friend to recognize who's there. Light in free hand.

I don't judge you if you mount a light on your gun, just food for thought.
__________________
GTDS Member #7
GOTOD Member #757
Snub Club Member #757
NRA Member
Member
concretefuzzynuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 16:05   #19
vandros
10mm fan
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: southwest
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by concretefuzzynuts View Post
If I'm trying to find out what that bump in the middle of the night was, I don't want to point a weapon at a family member or friend to recognize who's there. Light in free hand..
I hear this argument a lot from people I respect - so you are in good company

However, I was wondering if you could point the light a bit to the side, to address this valid concern? Today's lights, like TLR/surefire/etc. seem bright enough to illuminate the entire room...

Not trying to argue - rather figure it out for myself.
__________________
glock 4 gun; strider 4 knife

Last edited by vandros; 01-23-2013 at 16:06..
vandros is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 18:48   #20
RyanNREMTP
Inactive/Banned
 
RyanNREMTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waco, Texas
Posts: 4,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by vandros View Post
I hear this argument a lot from people I respect - so you are in good company

However, I was wondering if you could point the light a bit to the side, to address this valid concern? Today's lights, like TLR/surefire/etc. seem bright enough to illuminate the entire room...

Not trying to argue - rather figure it out for myself.
What I hear is recommended is to primarily use a second flashlight. Use the weapon light when you need the other hand to do something like open a door or something.
__________________
Support Free Range Shopping Carts on Facebook.
RyanNREMTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 21:33   #21
concretefuzzynuts
Brew Crew
 
concretefuzzynuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: VB, VA
Posts: 6,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by vandros View Post
I hear this argument a lot from people I respect - so you are in good company

However, I was wondering if you could point the light a bit to the side, to address this valid concern? Today's lights, like TLR/surefire/etc. seem bright enough to illuminate the entire room...

Not trying to argue - rather figure it out for myself.
I deserve little respect. I am a typed opinion on the internet.

Thanks.
__________________
GTDS Member #7
GOTOD Member #757
Snub Club Member #757
NRA Member
Member
concretefuzzynuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2013, 05:57   #22
Bill Lumberg
BTF Inventor
 
Bill Lumberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,874
Anyone who thinks that using a weapon light requires the weapon to be pointed at the threat in order to illuminate it has no experience using weapon lights. When I was first introduced to mounted lights, I thought the same thing- great, a light that can only be used when you're pointing your gun at someone or something. That couldn't be further from the truth. Weapon lights aren't that useful for novices or anyone who has not been trained and had time to practice using them. That said, weapon lights provide significant illumination from the low ready. Threats all the way down a hallway or alley are easily identified, even with the gun pointed down at the ground, at a 45 degree-ish angle. Weapon lights do not do everything a handheld flashlight can do. But for law enforcement use or some home protection use, they can be excellent. Back to your regularly scheduled topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by vandros View Post
I hear this argument a lot from people I respect - so you are in good company

However, I was wondering if you could point the light a bit to the side, to address this valid concern? Today's lights, like TLR/surefire/etc. seem bright enough to illuminate the entire room...

Not trying to argue - rather figure it out for myself.
__________________
Did someone talk to you about your TPS reports?

Last edited by Bill Lumberg; 01-29-2013 at 05:20..
Bill Lumberg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 21:58   #23
DeLo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southland
Posts: 713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg View Post
Anyone who thinks that using a weapon light requires the weapon to be pointed at the threat in order to illuminate it has no experience using weapon lights. When I was first introduced to mounted lights, I thought the same thing- great, a light that can only be used when you're pointing your gun at someone or something. That couldn't be further from the truth. Weapon lights aren't that useful for novices or anyone who has not been trained and had time to practice using them. That said, weapon lights provide significant illumination from the low ready. Threats all the way down a hallway or alley are easily identified, even with the gun pointed down at the ground, at a 45 degree-ish angle. Weapon lights do not do everything a handheld flashlight can do. But for law enforcement use or some home protection use, they can be excellent. Back to your regularly scheduled topic.
So if just for low ready and not for a blinding effect then why not use a OEM Glock light? I assume the reason for the Failures is the weight of the light or the screw being to tight. Wouldn't a polymer light help both of those? Purely a question, and based on HD and not LE.
__________________
Restless Leg Syndrome.
DeLo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2013, 22:15   #24
willy1094
Senior Member
 
willy1094's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 611
Send a message via AIM to willy1094
I have a G23 and just put a TLR-1s on it. I had never had any FTFs with it but had two last time we took it to the range(WWB 150 rounds). Both times the wife was shooting so I'll have to rule out "limp wrist" but that will be a while since ammo is hard to come by.
willy1094 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2013, 15:46   #25
concretefuzzynuts
Brew Crew
 
concretefuzzynuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: VB, VA
Posts: 6,096
Double tap. What?
__________________
GTDS Member #7
GOTOD Member #757
Snub Club Member #757
NRA Member
Member

Last edited by concretefuzzynuts; 01-23-2013 at 15:47..
concretefuzzynuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
malfunction, tlr-1
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:56.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,471
399 Members
1,072 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42