Important Notice: The site is currently being upgraded to a new software system. This process could take a day or two to complete. During that time, we are going to leave the site up here, on its old software. WHAT GETS POSTED HERE DURING THIS TRANSITION WILL NOT BE COPIED OVER ONTO THE NEW SITE, WHEN THE UPGRADE IS COMPLETE. When we swap over, the content posted while this message is visible will be lost. We wanted to give you folks a place to hang out and talk while we worked though. We will let you know when we are finished. Please pardon the inconvenience, during this transition.

Home Forums Classifieds GT Store Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups


Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-28-2013, 11:05   #1
btaylor's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 25
Which stance?

I'm getting conflicting training regarding stance. The last defensive handgun course I attended taught a stance with shoulders square to the threat and arms locked out. Previously I had been taught Weaver stance with 30 degree shoulder and body rotation toward strong side. I can shoot well using either but want to do the best I can. Can you give your advice and experience in real world encounters? Should I go to the trouble to adapt to whatever course I am taking at the time or stick with one all the time?

Thanks for all you do for this forum and the great books and articles you've written over the years.
btaylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2013, 12:50   #2
Mas Ayoob
Mas Ayoob's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,473
I don't see it as either/or. For decades, I've taught Isosceles AND classic Weaver, with Ray Chapman's modification of the Weaver stance (gun arm locked, support arm bent and pulling back, shoulders somewhat forward) in between.

The reason is, we have to be able to respond to unpredictable angles of attack, which are highly likely to come unexpectedly from a flank. Classic Weaver with both elbows bent gives you much more rotation range of the gun toward your non-dominant side than Isosceles, and Isosceles in turn gives you more range toward your dominant side than Weaver. You may be butt-down, caught in a narrow space between a couple of vehicles as in a parking lot, on ice or staircase or whatever, and be unable to step into your preferred stance.

What you're wearing may have an effect, too. Very heavy winter clothing or tight suits can restrict you from extending into Isosceles, but Weaver will work in that situation. Classic Weaver blades the armpit and side vulnerably toward your opponent if you're wearing body armor, but Isosceles squares up the armor between your torso and the identified threat you're facing, maimizing your protection. There are also issues of eye dominance, arm injury, ranges of movement, etc. to consider.

Space is limited here, but you'll find more discussion on this in a couple of my books, "StressFire" and "Gun Digest Book of Combat Handgunnery, Volume 6," both available from Amazon last I knew.

Mas Ayoob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2013, 18:18   #3
btaylor's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 25
Thanks. Time for some more reading.
btaylor is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57.

GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
GT Store

Users Currently Online: 600
143 Members
457 Guests

Most users ever online: 4,867
May 19, 2015 at 1:03