Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.

 
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2013, 10:48   #1
soundguy
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 62
Ranger T tough enough?

I'm thinking about pulling some 165's and/or 180's and loading them to 10mm velocities. I'm not trying to go nuclear with these. Probably around 1250 for the 180's and 1350 for the 165's.

I dont have a huge amount to waste on testing, so I'd like some thoughts on this.

Will these hold up to those velocities, or should these not be pushed past the 40sw velocities?


These would not be my daily carry round. So no lectures on that, thanks.

I'm just wondering if this is even an option.

Thanks.
soundguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 10:52   #2
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
I dont think this answers your question directly, but I would bet a gold dot is tougher than a ranger T...

Im guessing the ranger T's will be maxed out (from a terminal ballistics standpoint) at least 100 FPS lower than your intended velocities


Quote:
I'm just wondering if this is even an option.
Of course it is! just stick to safe reloading practices and go find out how it works for us!
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.

Last edited by gofastman; 02-01-2013 at 10:55..
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 11:52   #3
soundguy
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofastman View Post
....and go find out how it works for us!

Thats what I was hoping someone else has/will do

I could definitely load it 100fps slower.

Just found this comparison. It seem the T may not have great weight retention compared to say an xtp.

It also doesn't make sense that the 165 retained less in bare gelatin than all other media. Also the 230's had great retention. So that may be the answer. If we can assume the bullet is designed the exact same way in all calibers, the slower the velocity, the better weight retention.
It seems the T may be designed for the velocities of the factory loading and may break apart too much at higher velocities.

I guess I could have done a little more research before I posted.


10mm Reloading Forum
soundguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 11:57   #4
soundguy
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 62
Here is the expanded comparison

10mm Reloading Forum

Last edited by soundguy; 02-01-2013 at 11:58..
soundguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 16:28   #5
cowboy1964
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 15,355
Personally I wouldn't push Ranger T's faster than stock velocity. Or any non-bonded bullet for that matter.

Last edited by cowboy1964; 02-01-2013 at 16:28..
cowboy1964 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 16:35   #6
spcwes
Senior Member
 
spcwes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboy1964 View Post
Personally I wouldn't push Ranger T's faster than stock velocity. Or any non-bonded bullet for that matter.
This is the same thing I would say. I mean if you just want to play around by all means but I would use Gold Dots. We have ran gold dots WAY faster than they were intended and the semi custom ammo companies used 9mm Gold Dot bullets for the first few years loading them into 357sigs and 40 SW for the hot 10mm loads and they still worked great.

I remember shooting a 124gr gold dot loaded by Double Tap around 1600fps and the bullet still did great even though it was like a fat dime and was expanded as much as it possibly could be.
__________________
"We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American perception that each individual is accountable for his/her actions." -Ronald Reagan-
spcwes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2013, 10:04   #7
SDGlock23
Glockoholic
 
SDGlock23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Land of Forgetfulness
Posts: 7,725
I wouldn't push it much faster. Could it handle another 100 fps? Probably, but I wouldn't go much past that.
__________________
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."
SDGlock23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 14:39   #8
MinervaDoe
Senior Member
 
MinervaDoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Way out in left field
Posts: 7,084
Blog Entries: 5
I've seen threads that demonstrate the Hornady XTP bullets have great weight retention at hot 10mm velocities. Plus, you wouldn't have to pull them to get a solid performing bullet.
MinervaDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 18:58   #9
RYT 2BER
Senior Member
 
RYT 2BER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Gunshine State
Posts: 2,518
Based on what you guys are saying I guess 155gr silvertips are out of the question.
__________________
Unfortunately, with all the advances in medical science, there still just isnt any cure for "stupid".
RYT 2BER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2013, 22:04   #10
gofastman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by RYT 2BER View Post
Based on what you guys are saying I guess 155gr silvertips are out of the question.
not really, The silvertip is a tough bullet.

Quote:
Personally I wouldn't push Ranger T's faster than stock velocity. Or any non-bonded bullet for that matter.
the XTP isnt bonded and they perform much better at higher velocity
__________________
You have reached the end of the internet.
Now go outside and play.

Last edited by gofastman; 02-03-2013 at 22:06..
gofastman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2013, 14:36   #11
GONIF
Member
 
GONIF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PHOENIX
Posts: 33
I have been useing 180 grain Remington Golden Sabers at 1350 fps and getting excellant results . I find that 9.3 to 9.5 grains of Longshot with a 180Remington Golden Saber is perfect for anything I do with a 10mm in the lower 48 . I call it my Goldie locks load ,not too hot not too cold but just right.
__________________
WHO ME ?

Last edited by GONIF; 02-04-2013 at 14:40..
GONIF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 00:20   #12
dm1906
Retired SO
 
dm1906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PRK (Kalifornia)
Posts: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by gofastman View Post
not really, The silvertip is a tough bullet.


the XTP isnt bonded and they perform much better at higher velocity
Ditto, especially the XTP. I've pushed the 180 gr. XTP well past 1700 FPS, and they just work. Of course, not with a 10mm Auto. 124 gr. 9mm bullets considerably faster than that (9x25). I'm considering doing some extensive testing with the HAP bullet (XTP, without the skives) as the velocities go higher, to get away from the "controlled expansion", which is designed to control expansion with a specific range of velocity. I've not done any work with the Silvertip in 10mm, but they were phenomenal with the Magnums (.357, .41, .44, .45LC) and didn't seem to have a speed limit (20 years ago).
__________________
Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. -- The Duke
dm1906 is offline   Reply With Quote

 
  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58.




Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 603
142 Members
461 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,672
Aug 11, 2014 at 2:31