GlockTalk.com
Home Forums Classifieds Blogs Today's Posts Search Social Groups



  
SIGN-UP
Notices

Glock Talk
Welcome To The Glock Talk Forums.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2007, 16:10   #1
GixxerSixxer
Phil Deez Nutz
 
GixxerSixxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 2,006
New proposed Gun bills

• SB201. Gives Utahns the right to carry guns in a state of declared emergency even without a permit.

• SB251. Prohibits guns in certain areas of college campuses.

• HB355. Allows hotel guests to bring legally permitted weapons into their rooms.

• HB354. Allows those with concealed weapons permits to bring their guns on a bus.



http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,655192376,00.html
GixxerSixxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 19:24   #2
Sambolijah
.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 1,733
Quote:
Walker also sponsored HB354, which would allow a person with a concealed weapons permit to bring guns on a bus. He said now, "a person with a concealed weapons permit could enter a terminal of a bus station ... but couldn't go onto the bus."

What??? Since when is a bus prohibited in the first place?

Guys, this "compromise" with the U of U is threatening our rights. PLEASE call your representatives TODAY and get them to OPPOSE any cave-in on our rights.

A compromise is this: Anti-gun folks want to restrict guns from certain areas of college campuses. Pro-rights people want to eliminate the NEED for a CCW permit.
Antis: We don't want guns on campus. Lets compromise.
Us: Okay. We will agree, if you agree to remove the CCW permit requirement, so our carry laws reflect those of Alaska and/or Vermont.
Antis:
Both sides need to give and take, not just one side, for it to be considered a compromise.

So don't just give in.
__________________
The Proper Role of Government

Last edited by Sambolijah; 01-31-2007 at 15:08..
Sambolijah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 20:41   #3
UtahIrishman
BLR
 
UtahIrishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Utah
Posts: 6,045


I'm going from memory here so correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that inter-state buses such as Greyhound are legally bound by Federal DOT regulations. So any changes by the state of Utah would be moot anyways...unfortunately.

If it's about city buses then I didn't know you couldn't carry. Doesn't make sense to me. Buses and train stations are probably some of the most dangerous public places you can be.

The college campus change I oppose. Many college students are out and about at odd hours for classes etc. They need the protection that a CCW can give them, especially coeds.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Juvenal

----
UtahIrishman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 14:57   #4
Sambolijah
.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 1,733
If you don't know who your state-level Senator or Representative is, go here: http://le.utah.gov/Documents/find.htm

PLEASE tell them to OPPOSE SB251.
__________________
The Proper Role of Government
Sambolijah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 21:58   #5
sickboy013
Senior Member
 
sickboy013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UT
Posts: 255
I personally am very opposed to the proposed ban of ccw firearms on campus. I have relatives that carry that live on campus. I think its bs. When are people going to realize that it is not the law abiding citizens carrying ccw that are committing crimes? It's the people that are carrying illegally.

The U of U vice pres. or something still tries to keep students from carrying on campus even though the last time the bill was voted on it was denied.
sickboy013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2007, 16:47   #6
Gibbles
Senior Member
 
Gibbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UT
Posts: 477
It seems allot of liberals suffer from a form of tunnel vision; they only see a narrow part of a issue.
Gibbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 14:41   #7
Sambolijah
.
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UT
Posts: 1,733
Update: more information has been released about SB 251.

Quoted below is an email I received today from the Utah Shooting Sports Council.

Guys, PLEASE call your representatives and senators, especially the senators named below.

Quote:
Utah Shooting Sports Council URGENT ACTION ALERT February 4, 2007
-- Immediate action required- Contact Senate Rules Committee to OPPOSE SB 251

***************
IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED

With the University of Utah threatening to resume their lawsuit in federal court, some Legislators are eager to give in to the University’s demand for authority to impose a campus gun ban. This will cover ALL of Utah’s state owned higher education facilities, not just the University of Utah!

Their previous ban (declared illegal by the Utah Supreme Court) applied only to University staff and students, but now they want to expand their control to ALL PERMIT HOLDERS who enter University property for any reason!

Existing laws cover violent criminal acts, threatening others with weapons, and restrict carrying concealed weapons by anyone but permit holders. The U’s President Young even admits this in his February 1, 2007 email, available at http://UtahShootingSports.com/ 07feb1.u.email.htm

Permit holders are all at least 21 years old, with a clean criminal record, are not drug addicts or mental cases, have had training, passed a FBI background check, and have their background checked again every single day! Permit holders are at least as law abiding as police officers and legislators, so they are not a threat to anyone at the Universities. It is absurd that the Universities, or the Legislature are discussing bans on permit holders!

Senator Greg Bell’s SB 251 (Higher Education- Concealed Firearm Restrictions) was finally released today. You can read the full text at http://le.utah.gov/~2007/bills/sbillint/sb0251.htm

This bill will allow Universities to make rules banning legally carried self defense guns from the office of a faculty or staff member. This could be twisted to apply to virtually any classroom, lab, locker room, janitorial closet, student aid office, library or other place on campus claimed to be an “office.” Theoretically, “reasonably proximate secure storage facilities” would be required, but that provision is wide open for abuse by having them several buildings away, if they bother to install them at all. It also will make known the identity of people who legally carry self defense weapons as they use these facilities. Criminals will never comply with such a requirement, just permit holders!

This bill will also allow rules that “allow residents to have only roommates who are not permit holders”. This can be an excuse to force permit holders into high priced singles, or exclude them from campus housing entirely. Imagine the outrage if they tried to exclude people based on race, religion or sexual orientation instead of being a law abiding permit holder!


ACTION REQUIRED- DO THIS NOW!!!

PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS OF THE RULES COMMITTEE IMMEDIATELY BY PHONE, FAX OR EMAIL. (Please be polite and do not call after 9:00 PM)

Senator Bill Hickman, Chairman (Washington County) bhickman@utahsenate.org
Senator Peter Knudson (Box Elder, Tooele, Cache County) pkundson@utahsenate.org Home (435) 753-0043
Senator Chris Buttars (Salt Lake County) dcbuttars@utahsenate.org Home (801)561-0535
Senator Gregory Bell (Davis County) gbell@utahsenate.org (cell) 801-971-2001
Senator Darin Peterson (central Utah counties) dpeterson@utahsenate.org
Senator Gene Davis (Salt Lake County) gdavis@utahsenate.org Home (801) 484-9428
Senator Ed Mayne (Salt Lake County) emayne@utahsenate.org Home (801) 968-7756

Fax number for all Senators at the Capitol: 801-326-1475
Senate switchboard at the Capitol: 801-538-1035

SUGGESTED FAX/ PHONE MESSAGE/ EMAIL:
- - - - - - - - - - -
Subject: OPPOSE SB 251 (Higher Education Concealed Firearms Restrictions)
Dear Senator ___________ [insert name]

I urge you to hold SB 251 (Higher Education Concealed Firearms Restrictions) in the Rules Committee.

1. This bill is a waste of the Legislature’s valuable time. It proposes unworkable solutions to non-existent problems! This does nothing to improve “campus safety.”
2. Contrary to the fears of some academics, permit holders have proven themselves to be law abiding, non-violent citizens. Laws are already on the books against violent crimes by them, or anyone else with a gun.
3. University offices neither need nor deserve more restrictions on permit holders than any other state office, many dealing with far more contentious issues than academic discussions. If there is a threat, it is not permit holders!
4. Implied threats from the University of Utah to resume federal lawsuits are reprehensible, and Legislators should not be intimidated by them.
5. Far from making campuses safer, this bill only disarms the good guys, making campuses more attractive to criminals.
6. If allowed to impose any restrictions at all, the Universities will manipulate their rules to create a de facto campus-wide ban on LEGALLY carried self defense weapons.

Please hold SB 251 in Rules, and use your valuable time on bills dealing with real problems and real solutions.

Sincerely,
[your name here]




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________
The Proper Role of Government

Last edited by Sambolijah; 02-07-2007 at 15:42..
Sambolijah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 15:21   #8
UtahIrishman
BLR
 
UtahIrishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Utah
Posts: 6,045


Sambolijah

e-mails sent to both of Salt Lake County's senators.

One item that stood out for me was the issue of roommates that have permits. Unless things have changed considerably since I lived in a dorm you can change room mates without a hassle if you don't get along with them for some reason. First week of fall there were always people changing roommates for many reasons.

I think it would behoove a permit holder to tell his roomy he has a permit so there are no unexpected surprises, but to legislate it is ridiculous.

I mentioned in another post I went to Berkeley for one quarter in my younger days. What I didn't mention was I had a roommate from Montana who carried a Colt .45 revolver with a 6" barrel in his backpack all over the Berkeley campus.

As far as I know back then, 1974, he was perfectly legal. And he managed never to shoot anybody either.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Juvenal

----
UtahIrishman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2007, 22:06   #9
BigBore45
Senior Member
 
BigBore45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 493
A lengthy e-mail has been sent to all and everyone I know friends, senators etc.... I am an LEO in the state of Utah but I don't like our rights as citizens being infringed upon. I think they need to uphold the desicion made by the Utah Sepreme Court back in September stating the University could not overide State law. I hope this bill gets shot down quickly.


Thanks for the heads up guys

BigBore45
__________________
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
BigBore45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 15:49   #10
fyrmedic
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: SLC
Posts: 21
E-mails sent and phone calls made.
fyrmedic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18.



Homepage
FAQ
Forums
Calendar
Advertise
Gallery
GT Wiki
GT Blogs
Social Groups
Classifieds


Users Currently Online: 1,242
382 Members
860 Guests

Most users ever online: 2,244
Nov 11, 2013 at 11:42